But that is where the inculpatory circumstantial evidence comes into its own, the most damning of which is the eyewitness who identified Luke standing just across the main road from the footpath which led to the murder scene a matter of minutes after the murder.
Was it not the case that other people were also seen at the relevant time near the V in the wall where Jodi's (sorry I realise I have been spelling her name wrong) body was subsequently found? Was it not the case these people lied about this fact initially?
Was Luke picked out in a ID parade as being said person hanging around, or was it the case that it was claimed it was a person who looked similar to him?
Where was it exactly that Luke agreed to meet Jodi? Could this be why he was spotted near the scene? (if it was him)
Sorry I do not know the area, and probably have read the answers to these questions in the past but cannot recall what was said.
I had a friend who passed away several years back now, and there is a few times I could have sworn I had seen him, had I not known he was dead I would have testified it was him. I would have been wrong. (obviously)