Where were the DefenceIndeed, he had no previous convictions for sex offences or for any other criminal offences and in
fact was a virgin when he met his then partner Miss Morston. The judge cannot be said to have
correctly directed the jury in their conviction of Dr Vincent Tabak for murder, because the trial
judge, had been told beforehand by police officers, that a prostitute in Los Angeles had telephoned
the Avon and Somerset police to identify Vincent Tabak as her one-time client for prostitution in
Los Angeles and requested ‘strangulation sex’.
From the Sally Ramage papers, we can see that Dr Vincent Tabak was sexually inexperienced when he meet Tanja Morson and in fact was still a virgin....
This flies in the face of all that has been said about Dr Vincent Tabak's sexual appetite... The supposed sexual purpose that Dr Vincent Tabak apparently showed in his approach to Joanna Yeates, seems flawed.. (imo)
If Dr Vincent Tabak had a penchant for prostitutes, surely he would have been using these ladies well before he meet Tanja Morson... Therefore losing his virginal status...
And if he was into watching this porn on a regular basis, he again would have used the services of prostitutes before he meet Tanja Morson..
There has been NO EVIDENCE brought (A) to trial or (B) to the public that proves that Dr Vincent Tabak watched pornography or used Prostitutes... Yet the public have been tricked into believing that this is the case...
Did Dr Vincent Tabak wake up one morning and think... Oh yes i know what I'll do I will become a sexual deviant as my hobby choice??..... Ridiculous..... Sexual deviant behaviour tends to start at a young age (imo) and there is no signs of this in Dr Vincent Tabak....
There are NO woman that were produced at trial to state that Dr Vincent Tabak's behaviour towards them had ever been untoward... Dc Joe Goff stated after the trial that they never spoke to these supposed prostitutes.. So were was the evidence that Dr Vincent Tabak had this type of behaviour...
Would going in to Kiss your neighbour you have just meet, be the type of behaviour of a man like Dr Vincent Tabak, who to all intense and purposes, was very inexperienced, and obviously had never demonstrated this behaviour before, or there would have been a string of witness's to say so....
Why would Dr Vincent Tabak jeopardise his relationship with Tanja by attempting to kiss his next door neighbour for whom he had meet for a couple of minutes.. That seems highly implausible....
He apparently went as far as grabbing Joanna Yeates around the waist area so his hand was around her back... That too seems highly implausible, that action is of someone whom knows a person well, whom is comfortable, with a person... Someone whom is moving the person towards them in an intimate manner... That movement suggests that both people were familiar with each other...
Doing as best you can describe to the court exactly what you did
I put my hand in the small of her back and went to kiss her
Did you kiss her?
Noooo
The statements contradict each other.... Dr Vincent Tabak is agreeing he apparently put his hand around her back and then went to kiss her.... But when asked if he kissed her his response is of someone whom appears shocked at the idea... (imo)
Was Dr Vincent Tabak looking at notes when he made that statement about his actions ???
Wouldn't Joanna Yeates have reacted sooner, as Dr Vincent Tabak was trying to put his hand around her back... I do not believe that Joanna Yeates would have allowed Dr Vincent Tabak to get that close, without trying to escape his clutches... I cannot see her just standing there and not moving...(imo)...
Again I would say that that action, would indeed be of someone whom knew Joanna Yeates ....
I try to envisage Joanna Yeates stood with Dr Vincent Tabak in the kitchen, and him apparently moving in to grab her around the waist... Because lets face it that what it means.... never mind the small of her back rubbish.. They are describing an action of someone grabbing Joanna Yeates around the waist...
At this point wouldn't she move out of the way ??? wouldn't she duck, dive, grab his hand... tell him were to go...
She doesn't she starts to scream...... Why??? The big question is Why did Joanna Yeates start to scream after she was grabbed around the waist???
This in my mind suggest that these actions were done by someone whom she knew... Because I believe that Joanna Yeates would have made some attempt to escape before she started to scream....
I did notice the Defence nor The prosecution established how close to each other Dr Vincent Tabak and Joanna Yeates were for him to be able to easily grab her around her waist.....
The action is such that he would (imo) have to be close enough to grab her as her face to be close enough for her to be kissed... Was her head looking up??? Or was it down ??? I think these are important factors... If we are talking strangers here, I would imagine her head looking down and her chin close to her chest as she tries to move away from her assailant...
But the description that the court gives us, which is extremely vague, has us imagining that her head was up, and her neck was exposed, as to make it easy for Dr Vincent Tabak to grab her around the throat, when she let out a scream....
This doesn't sound right at all.... But what vision I mostly get from these action are, what I remember as a child, watching old "Black and White" Movies... when the man grabs the woman around the waist and pulls her closer to Kiss her... Occasionally the woman responds with a slap around the face... I can almost see the side on view of this action that Dr Vincent Tabak apparently did....
Is this the action that they are describing in court or wanting the jury to imagine ????
I will keep saying ..The words that came out of Dr Vincent Tabaks mouth at trial were not his own... The statement that he apparently has signed to say he killed Joanna Yeates hasn't got this detail... I believe these words have come from someone who was interviewed by the Police... And it has to be someone whom Joanna Yeates knew.....(imo)
The action of grabbing Joanna Yeates by the waist as to draw her in to kiss her is an extremely intimate action, that would be done by someone close to Joanna Yeates.... If Dr Vincent Tabak had a sexual purpose that they claim he did and was a sexual deviant that they claim after the trial... why would he even bother kissing her ..... ???
I would have imaged that someone with the sexual deviance that they say Dr Vincent Tabak had wouldn't have even bothered with foreplay, as he was supposed to be someone who like bondage type films... So why wasn't Joanna Yeates tided up and restrained?? Why would he bother with the pleasantries of kissing???
Ok, I'm sure some of you think that was just Dr Vincent Tabak answer for the court to make it sound like no sexual attack took place and it was all an accident...
But can you all honestly say what else Dr Vincent Tabak could have done according to the trial testimony and the evidence of Dr Delaney...??
Where was the DNA under Joanna Yeates finger nails from fighting off her attacker ?? Remember he has one hand around her waist and one hand either over her mouth or around her throat... How did he restrain her... Her wrists had marks upon them. That would take two hands... So where did Dr Vincent Tabak sprout 2 extra hands from???
Visualizing this attack, it seems impossible for it to happen in the manor they say it did... Without Joanna Yeates putting up some type of struggle that would leave the attacker with evidence of this assault....
Why didn't the Defence or Prosecution, ask Dr Vincent Tabak how he managed to restrain Joanna Yeates as to leave finger marks on her wrists and holding her waist and throat at the same time... Because all of these actions that left marks on Janna Yeates body had to be done whilst she was alive and the blood was still circulating around her body....
Neither the Prosecution or Defence question this implausible theory that Dr Vincent Tabak apparently did on his own.... But happily go along with it, so they have a scapegoat at trial to take the fall for the murder of Joanna Yeates (imo)
https://philpapers.org/archive/RAMTMT-4.pdf
