The Defence Will State Their Case

[justsaying]

One thing I don't understand:  if VT had child porn on his computer, why wasn't he tried for this at the same time as he was tried for murdering Joanna Yeates?  After all, possession of child porn is a crime; possession of other porn isnt.

To make sure the trial was fair. And, do you understand they would have had the difficult task of tracking down the victims who were photographed? He deserved punishment for those pictures and the victims deserved justice. I agree with MWT, he needs to be risk assessed for those images in the future, this would not have happened if he was not charged - he is a risk to children!

[justsaying]

Also he pleaded guilty to possessing child porn, he was never tried for that charge on the basis his guilty plea was accepted and there was no alternative charge.

[Caroline]

Yes, Caroline, I agree about the goading comment, which is why I have removed it.

Cheers.

[[...]]

I think I have found my Windmill... 

[Caroline]

............

It's just a bloke! No reason for you to know who he is and ITV were banned from the conference due to the following.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/jan/05/itv-news-joanna-yeates-investigation

[[...]]

Think it probably isn't relevant...........

[Caroline]

Think it probably isn't relevant...........

I agree.

[Myster]

I think I have found my Windmill...

This one you mean... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEhS9Y9HYjU

[mrswah]

It's just a bloke! No reason for you to know who he is and ITV were banned from the conference due to the following.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/jan/05/itv-news-joanna-yeates-investigation

What bloke?  Sorry, I'm not following------------------

[mrswah]

To make sure the trial was fair. And, do you understand they would have had the difficult task of tracking down the victims who were photographed? He deserved punishment for those pictures and the victims deserved justice. I agree with MWT, he needs to be risk assessed for those images in the future, this would not have happened if he was not charged - he is a risk to children!

Did they ever track down the victims, do you know?

[Caroline]

What bloke?  Sorry, I'm not following------------------

The bloke in the video that Nine posted then deleted.

[[...]]

Always good to find more images..

I always thought that the vehicle that removed the car from Canygne Road was actually on Canygne Road and not on the drive...!!

[[...]]

Just found out... that's the Volvo..... But I think that there were 3 cars moved outside at the same time on the same day.... I found this video.... link below....

* Chrysler

* The Volvo

* And The white car on a little  flatbed truck....

But the most interesting thing of note is the two men whom appear from the back to the left when the Volvo is driven from the drive.... There is a very tall man in a white coat who goes into the main part of the house...

Could it be Dr Vincent Tabak??  I know he's supposed to be away, but none of the timings we get stay the same....


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-12093117/forensics-remove-cars-from-the-home-of-jo-yeates

[[...]]

In Fact when you watch that video, have you seen the white vehicles that are two abreast outside 44, Canygne Road...

There are so many vehicles there, of the white variety, I believe no-one would have noticed, the removal of the white car....

[[...]]

In Fact when you watch that video, have you seen the white vehicles that are two abreast outside 44, Canygne Road...

There are so many vehicles there, of the white variety, I believe no-one would have noticed, the removal of the white car....

 Who doing the filming from that angle?? Cannot be the media, I am more than sure that they would have better cameras..