But there you have, does it matter if you believe anything I may say - Absolutely not. The irony of course that you claim I am spreading disinformation, how could you possibly know that Faith? You don't and I am not. So this truth, this absolute fact, that LM with Jodi Jones attended a 'gig' mid-June 2003 to see that band. That and again, absolute fact, LM was wearing said coat, never to be seen again from the day of the murder.
Your 'nowhere in the media does it say -------' Exactly the point once more, that reliance for manipulation to play around what can be sourced, and banking upon that which one hopes can not be sourced. Intelligent? Over four hours of evidence each day, and isn't it just terrible that the media did not choose to report every word, deciding to put out other news too!
Absolute fact once more, that even limited intelligence can digest. Now I wonder why the defence did not retain every single word, of every statement they accessed. How much proof of that jacket would serve beneficial to trying to cast doubt about him having one!! In excess of 8 people from different occasions/connection chosen to represent each, from groups of more. One teacher, do you actually believe there was only one who gave a statement of seeing Mitchell in that coat - Of course you don't, not even you are that gullible, surely? Fact again, his closest friend, would NOT and could NOT state they had never seen Mitchell in his lovely 'magic coat'
The reliance and manipulation of media articles, tabloids included of course. They mystery man, where the author works solely from the information obtained from a newspaper report. Has NOT read any statements from the two independent people, from the time. Guesswork and one big IF of when they MAY have come forward. Statements are dated. The attempt at ripping to shreds the outstanding eye witness testimony, of three people, not one, seeing LM that day in that lovely green khaki coat. To Ms Leans manipulation of an impossible identity made upon a male from Jodi's funeral. Vague she claims this witness was towards the SCCRC, no Faith it is the author who has to be vague, in the same fashion as no bike being seen at any V break, the manipulation around an impossibility. The only thing that actually matters is what that person actually did say some 9 weeks later and why it was not credible.
The utter hypocrisy, wilful deceit put out to cause harm to other human life, that same kindred spirit, enabler riding on the back of a convicted killer, doing his bidding. NO member of Jodi's family carried that girls coffin, it was the funeral directors. At no point was there any type of identity parade like the real deal where she manipulates this into ' a group of males all dressed the same' or from 'footage where they saw males at different points' to the ultimate 'I am not sure carrying the coffin is accurate' - Dam right it is not, not that the person did not say this, simply that it was far from accurate, impossible.
To your, and again that reliance to manipulate, banking on what exactly? That people have simply remained mute over the years! That if the truth is brought to light then it must be opposed, cites demanded or some guessing game as to how they know the actual truth. Your blind faith or manipulation of the truth? A neighbour saw Jodi Jones going home one day, walking along the Easthouses road after coming off the school bus, the time was around 4:10pm. A girl who knew Jodi by sight also saw her just after 4pm, just after getting off the school bus on Easthouses road.
NO Jodi Jones identified as walking along the Easthouse's Road around 5pm on the day she died. And as the author clearly states when moving on to her next contradictory point. "There was no evidence whatsoever of the route Jodi took that day" There is good reason for this Faith, for there were NO positive, confirmed sightings of that girl. The girl with the pushchair saw NOTHING, took her time in going forward, for she was NOT there around 5pm on the 30th of June 2003. The high five guy Faith HAD been on that stretch of road, exactly where the person claimed to see them, just NOT around 5pm on the 30th of June 2003.
So a media article, a totally discredited sighting in every sense, has today those arms and legs, that attack upon human life, due to lies and manipulation, of [Name removed] and a claimed photo of him carrying his sisters coffin, a backpack carrying a "whopping big bowie knife" - The deceit, the comedy of errors born from manipulation and reaching its climax with LM's new legal rep! in the shape of Malcolm X.
This is the clear type of people/person that is needed, enablers to carry out all sorts of attacks on behalf of LM - credible! honest! Give over will you. But as you say, the press did not report on it, so it must be lies! Soaking up every word accurate or not, leading from the sensationalism of a headline to draw the reader in, and still the limited braincells fail to connect!
Conned is the word and Nicholas is spot on with innocence fraud. But please, it you keep bleating out for cites, then why the hell are you even making any type of decision upon this case, with limited resource and pure blind faith, with no proof, no cites, nothing. This case has those spearheading it for a reason, it is not going to gain some review, the only thing that will be picked up upon any support gained, is the tactics, the deception in conning people.
level of intellect and the new group slogan "A Fact a day keeps the false facts away" - I rest my case ;-)
Chris - Really? Do you actually keep up with the hypocrisy around eye witness testimony in this case? Later.
