Author Topic: Netflix - the Murat interview.  (Read 17072 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #165 on: March 26, 2019, 11:18:52 AM »
They probably didn't have time to consider it all in minor detail.  You are suggesting that they did this on purpose.  Not on, in my opinion.

Times shown are approximate, but accurate to the best of our knowledge."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

That was given to the PJ on 10th May. Gerry McCann and Matthew Oldfield were then questioned and their evidence contradicted the timeline. Therefore the timeline wasn't accurate 'to the best of their knowledge'.  Perhaps the timeline wasn't priduced for the PJ? It was given to them by an LP FLO, not by a member of the group.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #166 on: March 26, 2019, 02:26:33 PM »
Which also suggests there was no collusion.
....or colluded to ensure disparity.
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #167 on: March 26, 2019, 02:50:40 PM »
....or colluded to ensure disparity.

Yes if course... If their stories dont tally it's suspicious and if they do tally it's suspicious.... Good job the Met understand  these things better than some

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #168 on: March 26, 2019, 06:04:15 PM »
....or colluded to ensure disparity.
In short anything they do is evidence of collusion, whether it’s all singing from the same hymn sheet or contradicting each other.  I should have realised that.   @)(++(*
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #169 on: March 26, 2019, 06:49:31 PM »
In short anything they do is evidence of collusion, whether it’s all singing from the same hymn sheet or contradicting each other.  I should have realised that.   @)(++(*
I know, hilarious. Those emojis.......crack me up every time since the 90's.

If you're going to collude you have to make sure it fits the narrative: if the narrative is 'everyone's looking after everyone else's kids to facilitate quaffage & scoffage', then let's keep it tight and get the times nailed; if the narrative is obfuscation, desperate arse-covering or revisionism, then 'Derek went at 6, then Sally went for a wazz after Chad returned....no hang on, Chad had a wazz at Terry's, then Karen checked on Colin's kids, but that was after Tony saw a man carrying an inflatable penguin, etc, etc......

Not that I'm not suggesting any of those scenarios transpired; merely setting a scene :emoji eyebrow emoji:
« Last Edit: March 26, 2019, 06:56:00 PM by The General »
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Angelo222

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #170 on: March 26, 2019, 06:54:27 PM »
At the time they were probably more concerned with what the consequences of their lax childminding would be if it was ever made public.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #171 on: March 26, 2019, 06:57:29 PM »
At the time they were probably more concerned with what the consequences of their lax childminding would be if it was ever made public.
Come on, Angelo, it was only like having your dinner at the bottom of the garden. Besides, they had a really good system in place, it was working well........
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Angelo222

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #172 on: March 26, 2019, 07:00:09 PM »
Come on, Angelo, it was only like having your dinner at the bottom of the garden. Besides, they had a really good system in place, it was working well........

We know all these checking claims were a crock of s..t.  Maddie howled the place down on a previous night for well over an hour while her parents were out socialising.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #173 on: March 26, 2019, 07:00:46 PM »
I know, hilarious. Those emojis.......crack me up every time since the 90's.

If you're going to collude you have to make sure it fits the narrative: if the narrative is 'everyone's looking after everyone else's kids to facilitate quaffage & scoffage', then let's keep it tight and get the times nailed; if the narrative is obfuscation, desperate arse-covering or revisionism, then 'Derek went at 6, then Sally went for a wazz after Chad returned....no hang on, Chad had a wazz at Terry's, then Karen checked on Colin's kids, but that was after Tony saw a man carrying an inflatable penguin, etc, etc......

Not that I'm not suggesting any of those scenarios transpired; merely setting a scene :emoji eyebrow emoji:
&%%6  Let’s have our cake and eat it.  Whatever they do it’s evidence of guilt, like I said.  Nice one, thanks  8((()*/

PS: Emojis in the ‘90s?   *&^^&
« Last Edit: March 26, 2019, 07:03:30 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #174 on: March 26, 2019, 07:09:55 PM »
&%%6  Let’s have our cake and eat it.  Whatever they do it’s evidence of guilt, like I said.  Nice one, thanks  8((()*/

PS: Emojis in the ‘90s?   *&^^&

You're the expert.
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #175 on: March 26, 2019, 07:20:37 PM »
You're the expert.
And don’t you forget it! 8)--))
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #176 on: March 26, 2019, 07:48:59 PM »
And don’t you forget it! 8)--))

....forget what?
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline jassi

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #177 on: March 26, 2019, 08:04:24 PM »
You're the expert.

Perhaps not.
According to Wiki. emojis date from 1997  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline The General

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #178 on: March 26, 2019, 08:10:58 PM »
Perhaps not.
According to Wiki. emojis date from 1997  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji
I knew that. I invented them. That's why I hate them so much. Like the despair Tim Berners Lee feels when he sees how his brainchild has evolved in to a cesspit of human depravity, awash with porn, memes, cats, meme of cats and people berating each other ad infinitum on forums.
I unwittingly unleashed an unstoppable atrophy of written language.




The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline barrier

Re: Netflix - the Murat interview.
« Reply #179 on: March 26, 2019, 08:38:43 PM »
It depends on which is worse.  Being the parent of a missing child or being convicted of a crime you didn't commit, or both.


Any suggestion why any of these should have Murats attention?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.