Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

he's broken the law by playing that taped converstation

[stephen25000]

I am sure if SY need to take action they will do.

Meanwhile Richard Hall and Heriberto, whom I believe you are fond of dave and have communicated with, or so you claim, are both into U.F.O.'s.

Quite a curious coincidence, isn't it ?

[Eleanor]

Have a care about what is said of any member of this Forum.

[stephen25000]

Have a care about what is said of any member of this Forum.

I gave facts.

[pegasus]

To clarify something on another thread
M Marreiros was collecting laundry at about 7.30pm-8pm Wed 2nd and saw a man in the stairwell
B da Silva was collecting laundry at about 6pm Thu 3rd and saw a man in the stairwell.
(corrected name)

[Brietta]

To clarify something on another thread
M Fernando was collecting laundry at about 7.30pm-8pm Wed 2nd and saw a man in the stairwell
B da Silva was collecting laundry at about 6pm Thu 3rd and saw a man in the stairwell.

So two witnesses saw the same happening on the night before and the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  It was checked and ruled out, so I wonder what the explanation was to allow that.

[sadie]

I am sure if SY need to take action they will do.

Meanwhile Richard Hall and Heriberto, whom I believe you are fond of dave and have communicated with, or so you claim, are both into U.F.O.'s.

Quite a curious coincidence, isn't it ?

I am not into UFO's. .... not at all

But because I have never seen one doesn't mean that they don't exist.  They may, or may not exist.

I am open minded


Perhaps you would benefit by being more open minded stephen

[sadie]

So two witnesses saw the same happening on the night before and the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  It was checked and ruled out, so I wonder what the explanation was to allow that.

Fancy ruling those two witnesses out?  Whatever was Amaral thinking of?

Hmmm?  £5%4%

[mercury]

Fancy ruling those two witnesses out?  Whatever was Amaral thinking of?

Hmmm?  £5%4%

Well, you can make a start on the discussion by proving
Amaral personally ruled them out,cant you

[sadie]

Well, you can make a start on the discussion by proving
Amaral personally ruled them out,cant you

Amaral was Head Honcho on the case.   Ultimately it was his decision


The Head Honcho carries the buck.

[mercury]

Amaral was Head Honcho on the case.   Ultimately it was his decision


The Head Honcho carries the buck.

you may have a problem there with what a coordinator does

[pegasus]

So two witnesses saw the same happening on the night before and the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  It was checked and ruled out, so I wonder what the explanation was to allow that.

Few realise there were two sightings - by different laundry collectors, on different evenings, but in the same stairwell.
Wed 2nd 7.30pm-8pm stairwell sighting by M F M Marreiros.
Thu 3rd 6pm stairwell sighting by B d A P da Silva.

[pegasus]

Stairwell sighting 6pm Thu, matches sighting in files by B da Silva, press report in 2007
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/new-madeleine-suspect-seen-in-stairwell-509604

Stairwell sighting 7.30pm-8pm Wed, by M Marreiros, press report in 2013
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-witness-saw-weird-1918572

There are close similarities between both sightings.

BTW the first sighting, by B da Silva, is also reported indirectly in statement by T Castela

[xtina]

Absolutely cringe worthy ... and this man has set himself up as a guru who actually seems to have a following.  Phew!

not actually seems to have a following .................he has..........

not a guru...just  shows the alternative to abduction .

for people to make up there own minds ...who have a mind of there own........

not what the mccs tell/want u to  believe

you tube stats
FIRST FILM: "The True Story of Madeleine McCann" (overall view of the case)

934,000 views - currently being watched by 1,190 per day


SECOND FILM: "The Phantoms" (showing that claimed abductors are mere 'phantoms' which were fabricated


120,500 views - currently being watched by 310 per day


THIRD FILM: "When Madeleine Died?" (suggesting that Madeleine may have already been dead by Sunday or Monday)
 

130,000 views - currently being watched by 1,320 per day


TOTAL YOUTUBE VIEWS to date:

1,185,000 views = currently being watched by 2,820 per day

This means that every minute, 24/7, two more people click on one or other of Richard's films.

====

These figures EXCLUDE:

* Hundreds of thousands of views on one or more of Richard's channels or websites

* People who have bought his DVDs and perhaps also shown it to relatives and friends

* Other YouTube videos of e.g. Richard giving talks or presentations about Madeleine on his tours.

====

Reading the hundreds of favourable comments made by YouTube viewers on his films also gives a very good indication of the success of his films

[Brietta]

not actually seems to have a following .................he has..........

not a guru...just  shows the alternative to abduction .

for people to make up there own minds ...who have a mind of there own........

not what the mccs tell/want u to  believe

you tube stats
FIRST FILM: "The True Story of Madeleine McCann" (overall view of the case)

934,000 views - currently being watched by 1,190 per day


SECOND FILM: "The Phantoms" (showing that claimed abductors are mere 'phantoms' which were fabricated


120,500 views - currently being watched by 310 per day


THIRD FILM: "When Madeleine Died?" (suggesting that Madeleine may have already been dead by Sunday or Monday)
 

130,000 views - currently being watched by 1,320 per day


TOTAL YOUTUBE VIEWS to date:

1,185,000 views = currently being watched by 2,820 per day

This means that every minute, 24/7, two more people click on one or other of Richard's films.

====

These figures EXCLUDE:

* Hundreds of thousands of views on one or more of Richard's channels or websites

* People who have bought his DVDs and perhaps also shown it to relatives and friends

* Other YouTube videos of e.g. Richard giving talks or presentations about Madeleine on his tours.

====

Reading the hundreds of favourable comments made by YouTube viewers on his films also gives a very good indication of the success of his films

Proof positive that there is indeed no accounting for taste.