Sadie had formulated much of her theory before we ever heard about Crecheman being traced by SY; I think part of the pity in that episode is that more effort hadn't been put into doing that by investigators closer to the time of Madeleine's disappearance.
I have never been totally convinced by DCI Redwood's eureka moment on that one.
But I don't think crecheman's appearance changes much if anything as far as Sadie's theory of what might have happened is concerned.
I agree that the mystery of the window was never about in or egress it was about something else entirely and that may very well have been to cover up the possession of the key.
No other such 'clue' was left in any of the Ocean Club burglaries and with the exception of Mrs Fenn's disturbing experience, nothing to indicate the MO used.
Sadie has suggested that the window had been opened either as an escape route or to pass Madeleine through. As well as expressing the opinion in the instance of 5A there might have been a requirement to deflect attention from something else concerning the crime ... use of a key for the door?
I doubt if even whoever raised the shutter and opened the window in whichever order that was done could ever have anticipated the way in which that action was destined to influence the direction the investigation would take.
The newspaper headlines the day after Madeleine vanished about discrepancies in statements and badly told stories about staged crime scenes must have combined manna from heaven with a get out of goal free card. In my opinion had they planned it that way, it couldn't have worked out better for them.
Just a couple of points, Brie.
1) I have never thought it likely that Madeleine was passed thru the window because there were no fibres or marks anywhere on the frame and to get her thru' without them, with such a narow window, she would have had to be passed thru lengthwise. A very clumsy and difficult maneouvre imo.
I think the lifter came in thru the front door using a key and exited the same way carrying Madeleine. I think the front door was then pulled to using the key, which had never left the door during the few seconds that had elapsed (?drugging) and lifting Madeleine. Madeleine was then passed over to Tannerman imo.
The lifter then hot footed it away, possibly to the ? staff quarters in Rua D'Escola, whilst Tannerman melted into the shadows awaiting the getaway car. When it didn't come more or less instantly he was anxious so with Madeleine in his arms he walked to Jane Tanner corner to see what was happening, or to meet it.....
He never intended to walk the streets carrying Madeliene, a stolen child, but was forced to by the non-appearance of the getaway car
2) THe other thing, Brie, is that, there were at least two burglaries in block 5 in the 3 weeks before Madeleine vanished. In both cases it was mentioned that a key might have been used because there was no evidence of a break in.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id331.htmWhat I truly cannot understand is why Amaral insisted that no-one could get in the front door, when surely he must have known about Mrs Fenns burglary (using a key?) and another one, the Scottish Lady, in block 5 where it was also suggested that a key must have been used, because no forced entry.
In this case we also know that they were burgled whilst they were at dinner. Madeleine vanished whilst the family were at dinner.
Anyone know what time of day Mrs Fenn was burgled?