I Am Going To Start Explaining The Searches Dr Vincent Tabak Was Supposed To Have Made!!
I did want you to remember this quote and the timing of the release of the Video....
What I can tell you is we still haven't found the pizza, we have searched bins in the aarea and we are working through 292 tonnes of domestic rubbish seized in the vacinity....
8:20AM GMT 05 Jan 2011:
And this quote:
By Gordon Rayner, and Martin Evans By Gordon Rayner, and Martin Evans 1By Gordon Rayner, and Martin Evans 12:58PM GMT 05 Jan 2011
Det Ch Insp Phil Jones said it was possible the killer had kept the grey knee-length ski sock as a macabre trophy, and issued an urgent appeal to the public to help find it in the hope that it could be the vital clue that will crack the case.
12:58PM GMT 05 Jan 2011
I'm having to work out approximateley when the time lines relate to what date???
At Line 340 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled on 26 Dec 2010
So with the quote above from Dr Vincent Tabak line 340 of the timeline is the 26 th Decemeber 2010
At Line 368 of the prosecution chart
Tabak searched for the Press release about
‘domestic rubbish’
‘Yeates’
‘architect’s killer’
‘maps for Clifton Road’
‘Clifton Road rubbish’
‘393 tons of rubbish trawled through’
‘household collections- Bristol City Council’
‘recycling’
So we have jumped 28 timelines at this point: to get to when the Police release the video dated 5th January 2010 to talk about the 292 tonnes of rubbish they have trawlled through???
Does the timeline mean the 5th January 2011??? or the 3rd from the press article??
Remember the press release was at 8:20AM GMT 05 Jan 2011: Wednesday
So where is Dr Vincent Tabak at 8:20pm on 5th January 2011..... well he's either on his way to work or about to leave...
Why doesn't it say on home computer??? we still don't know if that timeline is the 5th January 2011!!!!
If this search is on the 5th January... where is his search that says PIZZA!!!! Even if it's before where;'s the Pizza search???
I think he went to work around 9;00am normally:
Defence Counsel: What time do you leave for work?
Tabak: 9.00 am.
That was on a different day so I don't know if that applys to his usual time for leaving work....
At Line 369 of the prosecution search
Tabak searched for the words
‘amounts of rubbish seized’
Now.... Dr Vincent Tabak is an incredibliy intelligent man... he has PHD's... etc....
Again... it's the DETAIL...... well if on line 368 it says the amount of rubbish being:
‘393 tons of rubbish trawled through
And notice it's not even the correct amount of tonnage..........
Why on line 369... would he then search
Tabak searched for the words
‘amounts of rubbish seized’
Hello aren't we talking about a highly educated man here???????????
Why would he look after for the amounts of rubbish seized if he already knows how much rubbish was searched!!!!!!! Der.......
Up until the about 5th January 2011 Nothing had been mentioned about the grey ski sock:
A range of date between 26th Dec 2010 and 4th January 2011:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=missing+sock+found+joanna+yeates&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=1006&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A26%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max%3A04%2F01%2F2011&tbm=Nothing .... so the first mention is at the media conference on the 5th January 2011 at 12:58PM GMT ??????
At Line 369 of the prosecution search
Tabak searched for the words
‘amounts of rubbish seized’
At Line 372 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled the words
‘BCC household rubbish collections’
At Line 376 of the prosecution chart
Tabak’s research was categorised by the police analyst into ‘
‘Google’
‘forensic’
‘location’
At Line 378 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled the word
‘Yeates’
Tabak went to Google map and searched for the words
‘Clifton Bristol’
‘woods and surrounding area’
Then Tabak Googled the words
‘average rubbish per person in UK’
‘Yeates’
‘rubbish’
At Line 382 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled
‘Yeates pizza’
‘Avon police seize rubbish’
‘Yeates
‘Sky news images’
‘Yeates’
‘police’
Tabak also searchedhe BBC news article for
‘missing sock when found’
‘Avon & Somerset police’
Then Tabak researched for a Dutch article of ‘18 year sentence for murder’
I've done it this way because we're trying to establish when timeline 368 and 369 is: they could be the 3rd January 2011.. I found an article on that date....
Because next we have:
On 5 Jan 2011 lunchtime, Tabak Googled
‘press coverage’
At 3.05 pm, Tabak Googled the words
‘press coverage’
‘missing sock’
And again before that he searched
At Line 382 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled
‘Yeates pizza’
‘Avon police seize rubbish’
‘Yeates
‘Sky news images’
‘Yeates’
‘police’
Tabak also searchedhe BBC news article for
‘missing sock when found’
‘Avon & Somerset police’
Then Tabak researched for a Dutch article of ‘18 year sentence for murder’
Why would he search ‘missing sock when found’.... very specific on line 382
When they then say:
On 5 Jan 2011 lunchtime, Tabak Googled
That sounds like he has searched for the sock before the news of the sock was divulged??????? It was never found... it was never proven to have anything to do with a trophy.....
Thats what they want us to think....
I'd have been more inclinced to believe the search if he'd put HEALEY"S CIDER!!!!
Also what an odd search
‘missing sock when found’
Why when found???? What is it going to reveal.... Remember they say that he put it in the rubbish so it will be as contaminated as the Pizza box in all that RUBBISH!!!!!
You think his concern would be what they found in the Flat if he had been in it!!!!!!
The other odd thing is that there are only 28 timelines between=
26th Dec 2010 which is timeline 340
3rd ish January which is timeline 368
because we know that timeline 382 is where he supposed to check for the sock!!!
When is timeline 382??????
He apparently did nothing according to this from 26th Dec 2010 timeline 340 and about the 3rd January timeline 369.... only 26 timeline for about a week...!!!!!
What is GLARING OBVIOUSLY missing from these SEARCHES???????????????
(1): There is No search on CJ
(2) There is NO CONCERN about DNA
(3) There is no search on what CAR drove where!!!
(4) There is no extra searches of Longwood Lane (i'll explain later)
(5) No searches for Asda CCTV coverage
We Know that he gave a DNA in Holland on the 31st Dec 2010.... So why not the concern before or up until the 5th January 2011?????
Where are the searches about Cj's arrest... where are the Searches about the forensic's on the DOOR????
Why isn't he..... CONSTANTLY CHECKING THE INTERNET AT THIS POINT!!!!!!!!!
Remember the Police woman said when she saw Dr Vincent Tabak in Holland on the 31st January 2011:
He was Vague in some area's... He was over interested in other area's, Particulary around our Forensic examination...
There was things in his account that just didn't seem right.... to me.
And then his reluctance to give his DNA at the end of the process....... Again started to Ring Alarm Bells
So he's so interested in the Forensic's and every detail of this investigation, by the 5th January 2011... he hasn't
even checked out whether the DNA sample he gave in Holland on the 31st Dec 2010 would be a PROBLEM to him??????
You would think between Line 340 and line 368... if Dr Vincent Tabak was worried about DNA samples he's of been checking that all the time and the Prosecution would have JUMPED ON IT!!!!!!!!
On 5 Jan 2011 lunchtime, Tabak Googled
‘press coverage’
At 3.05 pm, Tabak Googled the words
‘press coverage’
‘missing sock’
At 4.03, Tabak searched online newspaper articles for the words
‘frozen DNA’
‘rubbish collection Clifton 23 December 2010’
They manage to get to the DNA ..... So suddenley after all this time he then thinks .... Hang on a wee moment there.... I'll check about frozen DNA... but I won't check whether the Police have a right to use the sample I gave them on the 31st Dec 2010......
And will they need to take another sample if they Arrest me????
To me these searches sound like someone following the case..... OR these searches weren't actually on Dr Vincent Tabak's computer!!
No search for DNA up until the 5th January 2011?????? I wonder what line number that search is????
At Line 376 of the prosecution chart
Tabak’s research was categorised by the police analyst into ‘
‘Google’
‘forensic’
‘location’
Line 376 does not mean that Dr Vincent Tabak Catergorised these events into GOOGLE..... FORENSICS.... LOCATION.....
It is the POLICE who do this at TIMELINE 376.... So if a jury member isn't on the ball they might just write these words down and the timeline number!!!
It would give the impression that Dr Vincent Tabak looked at these things on timeline 376
When we already know.. that he didn't look at FORENSICS by timeline 382!!!!!
But it's been planted in the minds of the JURY!!!!
That line of 376 should have been clarified by the DEFENCE!!
He was Vague in some area's... He was over interested in other area's, Particulary around our Forensic examination...
So what possible other area's has Dr Vincent Tabak got an over interest in.....
(1): Time of Death??
(2): Finger print analysis???
(3): What CJ could have told the Police
(4): The Front Door of Joanna Yeates???
(5):CCTV Footage of Clifton Suspension Bridge
(6):CCtV footage in and around Clifton:
(7):Asda CCtv
(8): Cars seen On Longwood Lane
(9): A Man actiing suspiciously on Longwood Lane on Friday 17th Dec 2010
(10):How much DNA gets leftbehind in the scene of crime
(11) EU Law and extradition....
I could go on......
At 4.03, Tabak searched online newspaper articles for the words
‘frozen DNA’
Now this is almost laughable..... That was the HEADLINE from the NEWSPAPER (Only in the sense of the words FROZEN DNA)....
Police hope frozen DNA sample on body will solve Joanna's murder as they warn women 'not to go out alone after dark'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343462/Joanna-Yeates-murder-Police-hope-frozen-DNA-sample-body-solve-murder.html#ixzz4SorklMZS UPDATED: 19:19, 3 January 2011
This is the only article on the words "FROZEN DNA" and the time is 19:19 .....
How many articles did he search????
A Range of dates from 17/12/2010 till 5th January 2011 only give you one result:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=frozen+DNa&biw=1920&bih=1006&espv=2&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A17%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max%3A05%2F01%2F2011&tbm=Now if this article was available on the 3rd January 2011 AND.... Dr Vincent Tabak was supposed to be following every single move of this investigation......
WHY.... did he wait 2 DAYS to check about the FROZEN DNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You see by this point you would have thought Dr Vincent Tabak would not of hung around Britain, if he was the supposed murderer:
Defence Counsel: Then in Holland the English police took your DNA. What did you think
would happen?
Tabak: I was thinking I would be arrested anytime.
Defence Counsel: Do you know what DNA is?
Tabak: Yes.
Defence Counsel: What did you think if they found DNA on Joanna?
Tabak: A sure match.
If he SAYS.... when he's in court that the DNA Sample he gave on the 31st December 2010 would be a sure match....
WHY is he not planning his escape to Holland?????????
Why don't his early searches indicate that he was trying to flee to Holland????
Remember 48 hours to turn around all the samples ... So... this sample may not have even been tested!!!!
He knows what DNA is:....... So you would think he'd do a search more relevant to himself!!!
Remember this from the 5th January 2011: The Policeman says KILLERS....
He said: "I can assure you, we are determined to solve this crime, and bring Jo's killers to justice."
Lets see how Dr Vincent Tabak's other searches change after this date of 5th Decemeber 2010
Dr Vincent Tabak doesn't look too over interested in the case up until the 5th January 2010!!!!!!
For a man feverishly following everything so he could cover his TRACKS!!!!! He looks like he 's not that fussed!!!!
EDIT:
Jo Yeates' body missing a sock when found, say police
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-12117460he wouldn't search it like it was a google search... why is it written like a google search when he's clicked on an Article??????
Tabak also searchedhe BBC news article for
‘missing sock when found’
The Article isn't worded like that!!!!!!!!