Sceptics beliefs ?

[barrier]

The window was open her child was missing,  wouldn't you look out of the window?

$64k quetsion is who opened it,like I've asked before why is an open window the sole reserve of an imagined abductor?

[Mr Gray]

$64k quetsion is who opened it,like I've asked before why is an open window the sole reserve of an imagined abductor?

it isnt....

[Eleanor]

You base that on? strange another mod likes the reply or there again maybe not.

Why would it be strange?  We are both Mods.

[pathfinder73]

$64k quetsion is who opened it,like I've asked before why is an open window the sole reserve of an imagined abductor?

There is no evidence of an intruder opening the window. The evidence speaks for itself!

[Eleanor]

There is no evidence of an intruder opening the window. The evidence speaks for itself!

Sorry.  No it doesn't.  But you do try to twist the evidence, or lack of, to suit your own blind prejudice.

[Lace]

She probably opened it herself to look outside, at least that's what the forensics tell us.

So lets imagine the scene.   Kate is enjoying dinner with friends,  she is laughing and joking and generally having a good time.   It is her turn to check on Madeleine and the twins.   Kate enters the bedroom as a gust of wind blew the door shut,  she finds the window open and Madeleine missing,  she searches 5a and looks out of the bedroom window.    Or,  she enters 5a Madeleine isn't there,  she checks the living room finds Madeleine dead by the sofa,  manages to hide her somewhere no one can find her clears up and sets the scene for an abduction.  No one can find Madeleine,  where has Kate managed to hide her?

[barrier]

Sorry.  No it doesn't.  But you do try to twist the evidence, or lack of, to suit your own blind prejudice.

Isn't that what supporters do,although granted, sceptics see no need of a thread attacking their view.

[barrier]

it isnt....

Steady on,thats approaching sceptic territory.

[Eleanor]

Isn't that what supporters do,although granted, sceptics see no need of a thread attacking their view.

Sceptics don't need one.  But you could always try starting a Thread on Supporters Views.

[barrier]

Sceptics don't need one.  But you could always try starting a Thread on Supporters Views.

I'm sure theres one somewhere along with another of the sceptic attack's,which I posted a link to earlier in this one.

[faithlilly]

Sceptics don't need one.  But you could always try starting a Thread on Supporters Views.

That’d be shorter than the King Herod Book of Babysitting Advice.......because the parents said so.

[Erngath]

Isn't that what supporters do,although granted, sceptics see no need of a thread attacking their view.

That is the way you choose to view this thread.
My intention in starting the thread was to find out why sceptics continue to view Madeleine's parents as being complicit in her disappearance after twelve years of no new indication that they are and after two lengthy police investigations both police forces have said the parents are not suspects.

The same myths, theories,  and supposed evidence has been discussed for nearly twelve years with nothing new to indicate the parents involvement..

[Erngath]

That’d be shorter than the King Herod Book of Babysitting Advice.......because the parents said so.

Is that one of your beliefs?

[barrier]

Sceptics don't need one.  But you could always try starting a Thread on Supporters Views.

Here you are,fill thy boots.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9996.0
And the other one.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9990.0

[barrier]

That is the way you choose to view this thread.
My intention in starting the thread was to find out why sceptics continue to view Madeleine's parents as being complicit in her disappearance after twelve years of no new indication that they are and after two lengthy police investigations both police forces have said the parents are not suspects.

The same myths, theories,  and supposed evidence has been discussed for nearly twelve years with nothing new to indicate the parents involvement..

Nor any one else,although I believe SY lead the PJ 4-3 on Arguidos.