Sceptics beliefs ?

[faithlilly]

Operation Grange stated from the beginning that they were investigating 'the abduction'.

Was that the review and the investigation or simply the review ?

[G-Unit]

Do sceptics agree ... do you?

That's what their remit says and I've seen nothing to suggest they're interested in investigating other possible scenarios. The PJ, on the other hand, haven't named a specific crime.

[G-Unit]

Was that the review and the investigation or simply the review ?

Investigate, according to Brietta's tagline.

[Mr Gray]

That's what their remit says and I've seen nothing to suggest they're interested in investigating other possible scenarios. The PJ, on the other hand, haven't named a specific crime.

The fact that the remit says, abduction doesn't limit them to abduction.. Weren't they investigating woke and wandered a little while back

[faithlilly]

Investigate, according to Brietta's tagline.

The remit was posted on SY website at the time of the review. It has never been clear whether the remit changed when the status of the case changed from review to investigation.

[G-Unit]

The fact that the remit says, abduction doesn't limit them to abduction.. Weren't they investigating woke and wandered a little while back

Thank you for your opinion, but I think a remit is a bit more prescriptive than you think it is. Wasn't that just one of those mewspaper stories many of which are rubbish, according to Rowley?

[G-Unit]

The remit was posted on SY website at the time of the review. It has never been clear whether the remit changed when the status of the case changed from review to investigation.

Is this a case of sceptics not sharing their beliefs? Oh dear!!

[Mr Gray]

Thank you for your opinion, but I think a remit is a bit more prescriptive than you think it is. Wasn't that just one of those mewspaper stories many of which are rubbish, according to Rowley?

Redwood, said Maddie may not have left the apartment alive

...that isn't abduction... So the remit does not limit them... Fact

[Brietta]

The fact that the remit says, abduction doesn't limit them to abduction.. Weren't they investigating woke and wandered a little while back

They will follow the evidence.

[Brietta]

I was discussing the attitude of supporters on this forum, not the opinions of the police. I've no idea what Perlin can add but it would be interesting to see what he came up with. .

Speaking of answers, how about my request for a cite as per forum protocol?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10634.msg521996#msg521996

Did you ever supply the cite I requested in January? http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10634.msg521996#msg521996

You can provide a cite for it if you don't mind when you are in the process of telling me exactly what you are asking for from me.
That would certainly clarify your requirement and prevent the goalposts being moved by you as in my opinion they so often are.

[G-Unit]

Did you ever supply the cite I requested in January? http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10634.msg521996#msg521996

You can provide a cite for it if you don't mind when you are in the process of telling me exactly what you are asking for from me.
That would certainly clarify your requirement and prevent the goalposts being moved by you as in my opinion they so often are.

I haven't a clue what you wanted cites for because you deleted my post. Why not just do the same to your own and we'll call it quits? That seems fair to me.

[Brietta]

I haven't a clue what you wanted cites for because you deleted my post. Why not just do the same to your own and we'll call it quits? That seems fair to me.

You seem very keen to have your cite ... please indicate exactly what you require as per my post ... and I shall endeavour to full-fill the task ...

[Venturi Swirl]

I take no notice carlymichelle, but then I just assume it's a tactic. Having spent years trying to convince people that there was no useful evidence in the car it's understandible that they don't want Perlin's input imp.

Who is “they”?

[Venturi Swirl]

Sorry, I was referring to McCann supporters, not police forces.

You’re not making a sweeping generalisation here are you?  Heavens above!

[G-Unit]

You seem very keen to have your cite ... please indicate exactly what you require as per my post ... and I shall endeavour to full-fill the task ...

A cite from the source of your knowledge would be nice. The procedures laid down for Police Scotland saying they must interview material witnesses when carrying out an investigative review of a previously investigated missng child case. Or delete your post, I really don't mind which.