1
Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. / Re: Luke Mitchell Theories
« Last post by Venturi Swirl on Today at 07:29:41 AM »I always find it interesting that while Parky and his compadres ridicule the idea of [Name removed] and [Name removed] becoming unwittingly embroiled in a murder of their friend’s making they see nothing wrong with believing that Luke, a fourteen year old boy with no previous criminal experience, was able to commit a horrific murder, a murder where even the police said that the perpetrator would be covered in blood, without a spec of unexplained DNA on him. Not only that but managed to change his clothes, if the eyewitnesses were to be believed, at least three times in the space of around 20 minutes without anyone seeing him return to the house where he lived to retrieve clean clothes or get cleaned up. That the three witnesses who were with him when he found the body didn’t no, really, honestly didn't change their story, even though it’s obvious that they did. Astonishing!So is that what you believe happened? The two moped boys accidentally witnessed a murder taking place and decided to cover up for a friend? Why could that person not have been Mitchell? One regularly sold drugs to him, no? Why come forward to the police at all in any case? And - in court didn’t the forensics expert testify under oath that the murderer would not necessarily have been covered in blood? But you believe that this conspiracy also includes members of Jodi’s family, so at least 5 people involved, including the mother of the victim? That really does stretch credulity yes, I can see why that idea is ridiculed.
And yet after all the subterfuge used to create an alibi he lets it slip that his mother had a fire that night. Shoddy!