Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 844203 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3585 on: August 23, 2015, 08:16:28 PM »
its actually English...third time...he didn't do the calculation but he managed to work out the right answer...

remember lateral thinking

Nothing to do with lateral thinking at all.

To get an answer you do a calculation, with or without the use of a calculator.

You both got the answer wrong.

So what does that say about you and your son's thinking ? &%+((£

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3586 on: August 23, 2015, 08:16:45 PM »
More double dutch.

You have proved nothing.

How can he do a calculation he doesn't understand.

When you do a calculation you get an answer, if of course you're capable.

You both got the answer wrong.

what I've proved is how easy it is to misunderstand the written and spoken word...three times I have said he worked out the answer....yet you keep saying he would be unable to do the calculation...

for the fourth time he worked out the answer but did not do the calculation...they do it on "A question of sport" all the time

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3587 on: August 23, 2015, 08:18:38 PM »
Nothing to do with lateral thinking at all.

To get an answer you do a calculation, with or without the use of a calculator.

You both got the answer wrong.

So what does that say about you and your son's thinking ? &%+((£

for the fifth time...Jack worked out the answer but didn't do the calculation...think laterally

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3588 on: August 23, 2015, 08:20:35 PM »
what I've proved is how easy it is to misunderstand the written and spoken word...three times I have said he worked out the answer....yet you keep saying he would be unable to do the calculation...

for the fourth time he worked out the answer but did not do the calculation...they do it on "A question of sport" all the time

The answer was wrong.

End of story.

Since when have log calculations  featured on a ''Question of Sport'' ?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3589 on: August 23, 2015, 08:21:10 PM »
for the fifth time...Jack worked out the answer but didn't do the calculation...think laterally

 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3590 on: August 23, 2015, 08:29:06 PM »
The answer was wrong.

End of story.

Since when have log calculations  featured on a ''Question of Sport'' ?

if I told you the answer you would understand...as it is you are getting more and more confused

he worked out the answer but did not do the calculation...it was  a childrens online game,,,,the correct answer opened the door

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3591 on: August 23, 2015, 08:32:32 PM »
The answer was wrong.

End of story.

Since when have log calculations  featured on a ''Question of Sport'' ?

the next question was even more difficult...the answer was 22...he worked that one out too...but it took a little longer

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3592 on: August 23, 2015, 08:33:31 PM »
just tell me it's impossible Stephen...like the abduction is impossible

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3593 on: August 23, 2015, 08:35:13 PM »
if I told you the answer you would understand...as it is you are getting more and more confused

he worked out the answer but did not do the calculation...it was  a childrens online game,,,,the correct answer opened the door

Sounds like Jackanory.  8(0(*

The answer was wrong dave.

log to the base 4 of (1/8) = -3/2.

NOT -2/3.

I hope that helps.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3594 on: August 23, 2015, 08:37:48 PM »
Sounds like Jackanory.  8(0(*

The answer was wrong dave.

log to the base 4 of (1/8) = -3/2.

NOT -2/3.

I hope that helps.

yes Stephen...it's been nearly 50 yrs since I did such  a calculation....but Jack worked out the answer himself

Offline G-Unit

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3595 on: August 23, 2015, 08:38:22 PM »
I just had a thought,   Grime says Eddie wouldn't alert to any edible pig products, such as pork,  pork chop,  bacon etc.    He used piglets not fit for human consumption,  by that I think he means they were decomposing piglets.  Yet he took a piece of pork drenched it in petrol,  burnt it, hid it,  and Eddie alerted to it.   Surely if you took say a pork chop drenched it in petrol, burnt it, hid it,  Eddie would alert to that too, it's all pork at the end of the day and I would think burnt pork would give off the same scent no matter what shape of food it started off in,  wouldn't it?

I would expect the pork to be part of a decomposing piglet, otherwise Grime was training him to alert to normal pork. He wouldn't do that because it would mess up all his previous training. This type of training allowed Eddie to alert to such things as;

The search of a suspect's 'totally burnt out vehicle' by forensic scientists did not reveal any evidence.
A 'one minute' search by the EVRD identified a position in the rear passenger footwell where the dog alerted to the presence of human material.
A sample was taken and when analysed revealed the victim's DNA.
The enquiry then concentrated it's efforts on the suspect and the EVRD located the body of the woman in a river bank deposition site.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3596 on: August 23, 2015, 08:38:36 PM »
just tell me it's impossible Stephen...like the abduction is impossible

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3597 on: August 23, 2015, 08:40:16 PM »
I would expect the pork to be part of a decomposing piglet, otherwise Grime was training him to alert to normal pork. He wouldn't do that because it would mess up all his previous training. This type of training allowed Eddie to alert to such things as;

The search of a suspect's 'totally burnt out vehicle' by forensic scientists did not reveal any evidence.
A 'one minute' search by the EVRD identified a position in the rear passenger footwell where the dog alerted to the presence of human material.
A sample was taken and when analysed revealed the victim's DNA.
The enquiry then concentrated it's efforts on the suspect and the EVRD located the body of the woman in a river bank deposition site.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

piglet twiglet...makes no difference...totally meaningless without forensic confirmation

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3598 on: August 23, 2015, 08:42:48 PM »
yes Stephen...it's been nearly 50 yrs since I did such  a calculation....but Jack worked out the answer himself

Ding dong.

You both got it wrong. 8(0(*

Offline G-Unit

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #3599 on: August 23, 2015, 08:43:33 PM »
I know enough to realise that all of that is of little significance compared to wind a rain...the gas molecules would quickly dissipate....would you not agree

I don't think wind and rain were a problem for Eddie;

The dog will locate human cadaver in water either from the bank side or when

deployed in a boat where a large area may be covered using a gridding system.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0