Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 844204 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4200 on: August 28, 2015, 04:43:00 PM »
I couldn't help but notice how you refer to google and the internet as being very resourceful, I must disagree with you as quite a lot of information on the internet is incorrect.

You have studied A levels "50 yrs ago", 50 years is a long time and in that time technology has enabled us to research and increase our knowledge, which is used to refine education and change it quite drastically.

" The older you are the wiser you are", this does not apply to you it seems.

 8@??)( 8@??)( 8@??)(

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4201 on: August 28, 2015, 04:43:30 PM »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4202 on: August 28, 2015, 04:45:49 PM »
Dear oh dear.

Science has changed over 50 years and you don't need to think outside a box for that

Perhaps you should take a look at the syllabuses these days.

No more log tables dave and your grasp of Chemistry is weak.

As to me , google isn't the be all and end all.

I read books, you've heard of them no doubt, and journals.

Your repeated mistakes merely reveal that 'googling' knowledge is not the be all and end all.

As to evidence dave, you only have one perspective in this case.

Protect the mccanns.

I never said science hasn't changed....your attention to detail is very weak

lets just deal with one of your claims...on what basis do you make the claim that my grasp of chemistry is weak...

seeing as you were claiming last week that water vapour was not  a gas you are making a fool of yourself once more

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4203 on: August 28, 2015, 04:46:55 PM »
Now there's a revelation ....

It would help if you did.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4204 on: August 28, 2015, 04:48:15 PM »
I couldn't help but notice how you refer to google and the internet as being very resourceful, I must disagree with you as quite a lot of information on the internet is incorrect.

You have studied A levels "50 yrs ago", 50 years is a long time and in that time technology has enabled us to research and increase our knowledge, which is used to refine education and change it quite drastically.

" The older you are the wiser you are", this does not apply to you it seems.

first I never referred to the internet as very resourceful I said it was a useful tool..it is....so that's your first mistake..
I studied a levels nearly 50 yrs ago ..not 50 yrs ago...second mistake
our  knowledge in many areas has improved...as I said in my field it changes almost daily...
I also talked about reading scientific papers critically   ...perhaps you just don't understand what that means

Like stephen your attempts to sound bright just shows that basically...you aint
« Last Edit: August 28, 2015, 04:52:56 PM by davel »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4205 on: August 28, 2015, 04:48:26 PM »
It would help if you did.

It so happens that reading has helped me to work out what Grime was really up to in PdL ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4206 on: August 28, 2015, 04:48:55 PM »
I never said science hasn't changed....your attention to detail is very weak

lets just deal with one of your claims...on what basis do you make the claim that my grasp of chemistry is weak...

seeing as you were claiming last week that water vapour was not  a gas you are making a fool of yourself once more

That simply reveals yet again a lack of understanding.

Now as for you.

Here's your classic.

pH  -  pOH has significance.

I challenge anyone on here to prove that is true.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4207 on: August 28, 2015, 04:49:52 PM »
It so happens that reading has helped me to work out what Grime was really up to in PdL ...

As an expert of course in libelling Grime. 8**8:/:

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4208 on: August 28, 2015, 04:51:14 PM »
As an expert of course in libelling Grime. 8**8:/:

First educate yourself on what libel is ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4209 on: August 28, 2015, 04:52:32 PM »
First educate yourself on what libel is ...

I'm not the only person to accuse you of that.

You should read your own posts.

Offline misty

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4210 on: August 28, 2015, 04:54:32 PM »
That simply reveals yet again a lack of understanding.

Now as for you.

Here's your classic.

pH  -  pOH has significance.

I challenge anyone on here to prove that is true.


Some of us are still waiting for your explanation of diffusion in the windless car park that made Eddie prance around 10m away from the source behind the sealed car door.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4211 on: August 28, 2015, 04:56:14 PM »
That simply reveals yet again a lack of understanding.

Now as for you.

Here's your classic.

pH  -  pOH has significance.

I challenge anyone on here to prove that is true.

still spouting rubbish...I have never used the word significance relating to that calculation...that's one of your major problems...you don't read things critically enough. I said it has A value... a numerical value..and it does

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4212 on: August 28, 2015, 04:56:29 PM »

Some of us are still waiting for your explanation of diffusion in the windless car park that made Eddie prance around 10m away from the source behind the sealed car door.
.

Read up on kinetic theory dear.

It might help.

The rate of diffusion is lower on a 'windless' day, but it still occurs.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4213 on: August 28, 2015, 04:57:31 PM »
still spouting rubbish...I have never used the word significance relating to that calculation...that's one of your major problems...you don't read things critically enough. I said it has A value... a numerical value..and it does

No it doesn't.

Not in any known Chemistry in this universe.

Now prove me wrong.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4214 on: August 28, 2015, 04:57:52 PM »
I'm not the only person to accuse you of that.

You should read your own posts.

Here's one of them:

Why did Mark Harrison dismiss both inspections at villa and gym with these terse words?

On 02-08-07 the PJ conducted a search warrant at a villa in Praia da Luz currently occupied by the McCann family.
 
Later the same day PJ officers conducted a screening procedure involving items removed from the McCann’s villa.


What's your answer?