Author Topic: Documentary proof concerning the moderator  (Read 536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

Documentary proof concerning the moderator
« on: December 28, 2015, 04:02:09 PM »
Jeremy supporters should be interested in the truth but all too often they are so desperate to advance their agenda that instead of doing so in legitimate ways they distort.  This ends up in a dichotomy. There are the arguments they make through the judicial process and then the arguments they make publicly with lack foundation and are basically lies thus they can't make them to the judiciary.

There is documentary proof of a moderator:

1) being conveyed to the lab and received by the lab on August 13, 1985.  There was Holab forms as well as continuity sheets.

2) being examined by the lab on August 13, 1985.  Examination records were made.

3) Records of it being entered into the property room records at HQ on August 13, 1985 after returning from the lab.

4) written messages recording the lab notifying police on August 14, 1985 that red paint was found on the knurled portion and human blood was found on the outside and inside of the moderator.  These messages were taken by clerical workers and passed on to the investigators who were not available to receive the call.

5) Holab and continuity forms that it was conveyed by Wolton to the lab on August 30, 1985.

6) Examination records showing it was examined by the lab in September, that addition blood was found inside  and type testing done of blood found.

There is also testimonial evidence (including written statements) that confirm the above and provide further clarification of when it was found, by whom, how it was passed to police and how and when it was fingerprinted and superglued by Cook. 

As a result of this evidence there is no way for the defense to allege to the courts that the moderator was not found when police say and examined when police say.

“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli