So deeply angry that she continued to write negative McCann stories as well as conduct negative McCann interviews for years and years after.....right up in fact until the time it was more advantageous, financially, to say she was duped. Odd that.
The point made is that the catalyst for much of the 'sceptic beliefs' with which we are familiar from social media is the senior investigating officer in Madeleine's case Goncalo Amaral.
He is now publicly accused by a reputable journalist of leaking lies to her which she then released into the public arena where they have stayed ever since.
Those lies were to the detriment of the parents of the missing child he was tasked with looking for, Madeleine. The journalist realised when the truth became known from the released files that his actions were detrimental to the missing child ... because there was no foundation to his thesis which he had promoted using leaks to the media, herself in particular, when there was absolutely nothing to indicate that Madeleine was dead except Amaral's thesis.
If you don't see how huge and how wrong that is ... I cannot help you. If you can't see the implications for writing off a missing child and throwing her to the wolves ... I cannot help you there either.
Sceptic belief is built on such foundations of sand as this ... I am intrigued as to how it has been sustained for over twelve years.