Sceptics beliefs ?

[Venturi Swirl]

Are you really saying that Eddie was wrong 11 TIMES......not only that but alerted wrongly to item connected to no one else but the parents ? Do you know how long the odds would be to that occurring ?

Of course you could be saying that Grime was being dishonest and was cuing his dog.....but I’m sure you’re too sensible for that.

What are the odds of a dog alerting in a wood multiple times where no body had ever been, but to which the handler had been told bodies had been taken?

[Robittybob1]

Are you really saying that Eddie was wrong 11 TIMES......not only that but alerted wrongly to item connected to no one else but the parents ? Do you know how long the odds would be to that occurring ?

Of course you could be saying that Grime was being dishonest and was cuing his dog.....but I’m sure you’re too sensible for that.

Is the comment "but I’m sure you’re too sensible for that" an ad hominem fallacy?

[ShiningInLuz]

Zampo who?  What was his last name?

A dog.  No last name.

[Venturi Swirl]

Is the comment "but I’m sure you’re too sensible for that" an ad hominem fallacy?

Give her a warning, it’s more of an ad hom than clever sausage imo.

[Mr Gray]

Are you really saying that Eddie was wrong 11 TIMES......not only that but alerted wrongly to item connected to no one else but the parents ? Do you know how long the odds would be to that occurring ?

Of course you could be saying that Grime was being dishonest and was cuing his dog.....but I’m sure you’re too sensible for that.

I don't think Grime wad being dishonest but I think he was cuing the dog..  .the dog ignored placed initially....yet eventually  alerted to places it had previously shown no response to... That doesn't sound very precise to me and IMO suggests cuing

[Robittybob1]

A dog.  No last name.

As in Gerry's comment "ask the dogs".   Ask Eddie and Keela, and make them testify in court.

[faithlilly]

I don't think Grime wad being dishonest but I think he was cuing the dog..  .the dog ignored placed initially....yet eventually  alerted to places it had previously shown no response to... That doesn't sound very precise to me and IMO suggests cuing

Absolute sophistry.

[Venturi Swirl]

Absolute sophistry.

No.

[Mr Gray]

Absolute sophistry.

In you opinion.. But Rob only seems to enforce that rule on my posts

[Mr Gray]

Absolute sophistry.

My post is fact... Yours is opinion

[ShiningInLuz]

I don't think Grime wad being dishonest but I think he was cuing the dog..  .the dog ignored placed initially....yet eventually  alerted to places it had previously shown no response to... That doesn't sound very precise to me and IMO suggests cuing

I've seen drug dogs, in New Zealand I think, go past a person arriving at Auckland airport without alerting.

Then go back for a second bite at the cherry.

They are not laser guided missiles.  They're dogs!

[Mr Gray]

I've seen drug dogs, in New Zealand I think, go past a person arriving at Auckland airport without alerting.

Then go back for a second bite at the cherry.

They are not laser guided missiles.  They're dogs!

You are quoting your opinion... It has no weight..
The PJ couldn't understand  why the dogs totally ignored places... Before alerting... In the other apartments... And the other cars... The dogs were not given a second chance..... How is thst a fair search... It isnt

[faithlilly]

My post is fact... Yours is opinion

Your post is sophistry. You can see how keen Eddie is to search 5a, even before he enters... there is no cuing.

Of course you think he consciously cued his dogs....you simply have no reason to explain why without looking like a real conspiracy nut.

[Mr Gray]

Your post is sophistry. You can see how keen Eddie is to search 5a, even before he enters... there is no cuing.

Of course you think he consciously cued his dogs....you simply have no reason to explain why without looking like a real conspiracy nut.

The apartment probably stank of luminol and other forensic chemicals... Alerting Eddie to a forensic scene.. That's why he eas, excited IMO.. I think the conspiracy  nuts, are those that think SY and the govt ate protecting the mccanns... Are you one of those... Your post us simplistic  and childlike

[ShiningInLuz]

You are quoting your opinion... It has no weight..
The PJ couldn't understand  why the dogs totally ignored places... Before alerting... In the other apartments... And the other cars... The dogs were not given a second chance..... How is thst a fair search... It isnt

I'm not giving you my opinion.

I'm giving you just a single instance out of many where a police dog did not home in the first time, but needed more than one pass before alerting.  It seems to be quite usual.