Sceptics beliefs ?

[Mr Gray]

I can only assume you don't.

Basically, I broadcast on my blog.

Whilst I interact on this forum.

Simple.   

well you assume wrong and it seems you dont understand...you interact on your forum....have you not noticed

have you seen taht comment box...where you interact...or is it someone else

[Mr Gray]

She used the word sophistry which isn't an actual lie.  Get her to show you examples (cites) of your sophistry is my suggestion to you.  Is she correct or not?  That is not my role to determine that.

her claim was opinion ..not fact...I dont really care just to point out your unfair moderation

[Robittybob1]

her claim was opinion ..not fact...I dont really care just to point out your unfair moderation

You claim it is opinion not fact.  It is not my role to sort that out.

[Mr Gray]

You claim it is opinion not fact.  It is not my role to sort that out.

stating my post is sophistry...is her opinion...not fact

[Robittybob1]

stating my post is sophistry...is her opinion...not fact

That is your opinion.   She called your posts "sophistry".  To call your posts sophistry is that a fact or not?

[Mr Gray]

That is your opinion.   She called your posts "sophistry".  To call your posts sophistry is that a fact or not?

no its opinion

[ShiningInLuz]

well you assume wrong and it seems you dont understand...you interact on your forum....have you not noticed

have you seen taht comment box...where you interact...or is it someone else

That's why why I used the word basically.

Blogs are not highly interactive, while forums are quite the opposite.

Chalk and cheese.

[ShiningInLuz]

all your opinion...my opinion...blogs invite comments...they have acomment button...hardly anyone comments on your blog which suggests a lack of interest

Nope, I get excellent viewing figures on my blog, which I have posted on my blog at least twice.

Please see my blog for details.   

[Mr Gray]

Nope, I get excellent viewing figures on my blog, which I have posted on my blog at least twice.

Please see my blog for details.   

excelent...in your opinion...no one seems interested enough to comment

[Mr Gray]

I'm not quite sure yet why you don't have your own blog Davel. It seems such a waste, that the man with the greatest understanding of the evidence and grasp of the facts chooses to restrict his vast wealth of knowledge to the little known by many, (no offence intended) UK Justice Forum. You should get your finger out and spread your knowledge and understanding far and wide imo. One thing's for sure, Mark S couldn't have heard it yet, he believes Madeleine wasn't abducted and she died in apartment 5A.

I actually asked mark for a debate on an open forum ...i predicted his big interview would be with amaral...his response was to block me...Mark s is woefully misinformed

[ShiningInLuz]

excelent...in your opinion...no one seems interested enough to comment

I have also got nearly as many comments as you have likes on here.

Mind you, I haven't made anything close to 30,700 entries on my blog.

Talk about flogging a dead horse.

[Venturi Swirl]

I have also got nearly as many comments as you have likes on here.

Mind you, I haven't made anything close to 30,700 entries on my blog.

Talk about flogging a dead horse.

Your blog has had over 5000 comments?  Prove it.

[ShiningInLuz]

Your blog has had over 5000 comments?  Prove it.

Read my blog from start to finish and you can count the exact number for yourself.   

[Venturi Swirl]

Read my blog from start to finish and you can count the exact number for yourself.   

5 blog posts this year and 16 comments some from yourself.  When did you start your blog?  1926?

[faithlilly]

The Murat villa was searched in the presence of Robert and Mrs Murat who accompanied the search teams.
Snip
The entire property was inspected by colleagues from Local Crime Section and Police Science Laboratory, with respective photographic reports made, with special focus on R.Murat's room and the vehicles.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/ROBERT-MURAT.htm

I cannot see any indication that the same intrusive forensic tests which were carried out in apartment 5A were conducted in the Murat villa.
Do you have a cite in support of your assertion?

Why do you think the Police Science Laboratory was there if not to take forensics?

Davel claimed that Eddie may have reacted to the chemicals used during forensic examinations. He gave no cite. I am simply saying that forensic examinations were also carried out in Murat’s villa, however Eddie did not alert there. Whether those examinations were intrusive or not is beside the point or indeed who was present