What will you do now a new legal team is on board and Dr Lean fades into the distance? A new team who, it must be remembered, would not have taken over the case if they thought progress couldn’t be made.
I expect the new team, once it is revealed, will be slurred mercilessly, just as others have, from the get go.
The groups, the antipathy towards Dr Lean, the hastily set up charities that collapsed just as speedily, those discussions will soon matter not a jot. The law will overshadow the pettiness that this case has descended into and hopefully future debate will be all the better for it.
Those discussions however will "matter a jot" - The law will take them on board should this case see the light of a court room again. Does one imagine that all that has been said over the years from CM, SL and so forth will have suddenly disappeared? That it will be irrelevant?
This new team from my understanding is along the lines of MOJO. A team where there is a person of law on board. Who are taking the case over, to look through. Not that there is an actual defence team on board at present.
And this slurred mercilessly? - Legal team, certainly not by myself. This constant 'pot and kettle' - the pettiness that you yourself have brought the discussion down to, time and again. That correction of spelling, the constant mockery - that predictive personal slate upon others in defence of?
And of my use of it. To highlight that those that were supposed to have joined forces, have split apart. That they condemn the very people from the C5 documentary, naming those investigators Jack and Victor ( not my words) And all else - from what should have been, a strong united front.
And that clear antipathy that you have, for every single poster who speaks out in defence of the Crowns case. That predictive air of superiority that has become your fashion.
One has only to welcome a new legal team, not to slate them. - To have exactly what LM needs - Professionalism. And one hopes that through this review of his case, by the proper legal avenues - will bring about a proper defence team. A lawful, fair crack at that whip, if there should be legal reasons to take this case before the courts again. To have two sides, legally, professionally and maturely - Not the drip fed bias in this mockery of a case that has been invented and over ridden with the exact opposite.
And as for future debate and the pettiness - It would be a breath of fresh air. - To discuss it, without all that has tainted it. To leave the books, the social media and all else aside. Where there is that fade into the distance - removed from that "parapet" - To discuss the case of LM V HMA. That has become lost.