Author Topic: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.  (Read 509490 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2745 on: May 18, 2019, 03:02:46 PM »
You now accept the statements may not be accurate.......so the discrepancies may be due to translation errors...poor recall..

Of course a lot more was removed!
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2746 on: May 18, 2019, 03:13:54 PM »
Of course a lot more was removed!

Try replying to the correct post... LOL

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2747 on: May 18, 2019, 03:22:47 PM »
Try replying to the correct post... LOL

Don't get steamed up.

My point stands.

 &^^&*
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2748 on: May 18, 2019, 03:31:47 PM »
Don't get steamed up.

My point stands.

 &^^&*

As does mine... Such a claim requires a cite

Otherwise it's pure speculation

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2749 on: May 18, 2019, 04:16:52 PM »
As does mine... Such a claim requires a cite

Otherwise it's pure speculation

Hardly speculation is it?   You will know full-well what has been removed from the files.

At least, if you have read up on them to the extent you frequently claim.

 &^^&*
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2750 on: May 18, 2019, 04:22:54 PM »
Hardly speculation is it?   You will know full-well what has been removed from the files.

At least, if you have read up on them to the extent you frequently claim.

 &^^&*

So no cite but it appears the mods allow you to get away with it..
Anyone with any common sense would understand  if we knew what had been removed it would be pointless removing it...

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2751 on: May 18, 2019, 04:28:47 PM »
So no cite but it appears the mods allow you to get away with it..
Anyone with any common sense would understand  if we knew what had been removed it would be pointless removing it...

Not the content, the category.

As anyone with common sense who has actually read the files will know.
What's up, old man?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2752 on: May 18, 2019, 04:30:32 PM »
Well you are wrong again... Taken in the context they were made I don't have a problem with any of those... They are valid statements..

Really? You have never compared the Portuguese police unfavourably with the UK poluce, have you?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2753 on: May 18, 2019, 04:40:36 PM »
I haven't listened to it yet.

Reading that feed:


3/ In that episode, former FBI profiler @JimClemente goes on to say Operation Grange's remit, abduction by a stranger, appeared to be 'faulty' because it seems to immediately rule out a variety of other scenarios.


is whowever Jim Clemente is aware that a scoping exercise and a review had taken place prior to launching the investigation?

Do you think that Jim Gamble wrote that the McCanns were innocent in his report? If you read ny link an ex Met woman says Redwood was saying the McCanns weren't involved on the same day that he was appointed to work on the review, so that has nothing to do with Grange's focus.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2754 on: May 18, 2019, 04:51:45 PM »
Really? You have never compared the Portuguese police unfavourably with the UK poluce, have you?
I don't think we can demand that Portuguese police operate to the same standards as UK police but Sutton himself has raised the question of inaccurate statement due to the way they were taken


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2755 on: May 18, 2019, 04:53:45 PM »
Do you think that Jim Gamble wrote that the McCanns were innocent in his report? If you read my link an ex Met woman says Redwood was saying the McCanns weren't involved on the same day that he was appointed to work on the review, so that has nothing to do with Grange's focus.

So do we simply accept this claim from an ex met woman to be true.... Is that how you think

Ms has claimed the dogs have been involved in 200 cases... Had repeated a claim by amaral that the shuttterd can't be opened from the outside... Accepted a claim by petermac that the window was to narrow for a man to enter... So we know he repeats things that simply are not true
« Last Edit: May 18, 2019, 04:59:35 PM by Davel »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2756 on: May 18, 2019, 04:55:45 PM »
Not the content, the category.

As anyone with common sense who has actually read the files will know.

The category I've seen known paedophiles and their details... Gunit claims there's much more... That requires a cite

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2757 on: May 18, 2019, 04:59:31 PM »
The category I've seen known paedophiles and their details... Gunit claims there's much more... That requires a cite

It doesn't

Phone calls.

Material withheld by UK request.

Blindingly obvious.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2758 on: May 18, 2019, 05:01:39 PM »
It doesn't

Phone calls.

Material withheld by UK request.

Blindingly obvious.

Then provide a cite.. As per forum rules... Or put two fingers up to forum rules as you normally do to show what an absolute  bore you are

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.
« Reply #2759 on: May 18, 2019, 05:11:50 PM »
It doesn't

Phone calls.

Material withheld by UK request.

Blindingly obvious.

What phone calls were witheld... Cite