Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views

[Nicholas]

No I do not, we do not all react how others expect - any emotion would have been under scrutiny as was his lack of emotion.

A lack of emotion could be suggestive of a lack of conscience!

[jixy]

A lack of emotion could be suggestive of a lack of conscience!

According to you . What do you base YOUR findings on as you clearly dont the facts of the case at all. Just the one sided view you chose to believe over time

[jixy]

 

I am your inspiration now. Guess I should be worried

Back to Luke Mitchell

[Nicholas]

I am your inspiration now. Guess I should be worried

Back to Luke Mitchell

Why do we never hear from Luke Mitchell's brother?
 I have a suspicion he knows his brother best and dare not speak out through fear of exposing the Mitchell family secrets/Luke's guilt further? Most definately worth considering IMO.

[Nicholas]

I would say so - on another note, I do not think a child can be diagnosed as a sociopath.

Do you think sociopathy/psychopathy is genetic? For example, if one brother has it, do you think the other brother may suffer from it too?

[jixy]

it is amazing and very scary how people's initial claims re sightings descriptions - evidence can change so much by the time it reaches court.

Whole descriptions including clothes hair and location has been morphed into something completely different before they even start on the timings.

That seems to be quite acceptable by some.

It is all so wrong!

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean "No Smoke"
"Finally, as with Derek Christian and Simon Hall, we are asked to believe that Luke Mitchell suddenly and inexplicably "flipped," behaving in a manner which is completely uncharacteristic, then almost instantly returns to normal
https://paulviking.websitetoolbox.com/post/infamous-cases-4689531#tr_39963555

Shaun Hall (4th Feb 2013-Jeremy Bamber Forum)
"He has a history that he shouldn’t be proud of and to be honest, stolen goods from 11 years ago are the least of his worries if its true as you say he is suffering at the moment. Hopefully he will be honest with you for a change, sadly this is something Simon finds hard to do most of the time

First, Simon had every chance to confess to his actions on the night of Joan’s death, however he decided to keep this quiet. Saying that anyone else should go to the police is ridiculous as they wouldn’t want Simon to get in trouble.
https://therealmrshspoofblog.wordpress.com/2016/03/27/the-burglary-omission-smear-campaign-hindsight/

Family members of murder suspects/murderers can and do lie for various reasons.

For example, some lie to protect their own reputations, some lie to hide family secrets, some lie out of misguided loyalty.etc

[jixy]

As we have already been advised, the topic needs to stay discussing Luke and his case. Not Sandra or Simon Hall. It was going nicely and we are looking forward to keeping on topic to discuss further

[Nicholas]

According to you . What do you base YOUR findings on as you clearly dont the facts of the case at all. Just the one sided view you chose to believe over time

Experience that family members in cases like this can and do lie and can and do lie for years.

And that a version of events; whether it be a prosecution theory or a book written by a campaigner cannot be relied on.

[Nicholas]

it is amazing and very scary how people's initial claims re sightings descriptions - evidence can change so much by the time it reaches court.

Whole descriptions including clothes hair and location has been morphed into something completely different before they even start on the timings.

That seems to be quite acceptable by some.

It is all so wrong!

The case of the prosecution is a theory of events. A theory of events often relied on by witnesses whose recollection of events can be sketchy or in some cases based on lies in order to protect themselves/others, family members.etc

When CCTV/photographic evidence isn't available for example, the prosecution have no option but to rely on witness evidence. This evidence can and does change before a trial.

In an ideal world witnesses would have photographic memories and their default setting regarding giving evidence, would be based on honesty.

[Nicholas]

Why didn't Shane Mitchell confirm his brothers alibi in court?

Forget what he said in his witness statements and the fact they'd changed and why.

Why didn't he say his brother was home and therefore couldn't have murdered [Name removed] at the time the prosecution asserted during trial?

He had options available to him, including lying. Why didn't Shane Mitchell lie and tell the court, "yes Luke was home with me?"

[jixy]

Maybe he wasnt lying. Why did everyone else connected to Jodi have the opportunity to chat and change their version of events on many occasions when they 'remembered' something

The same was not extended to Luke or his family... no anything that was remembered there was just another step towards proving Luke's guilt!

Compare the lies you think the Brother told to the conflicting info given by ALL the others. It may just look quite different to you

[Nicholas]

Maybe he wasnt lying. Why did everyone else connected to Jodi have the opportunity to chat and change their version of events on many occasions when they 'remembered' something

The same was not extended to Luke or his family... no anything that was remembered there was just another step towards proving Luke's guilt!

Compare the lies you think the Brother told to the conflicting info giving by ALL the others. It may just look quite different to you

Yes it was

[Nicholas]

Maybe he wasnt lying. Why did everyone else connected to Jodi have the opportunity to chat and change their version of events on many occasions when they 'remembered' something

The same was not extended to Luke or his family... no anything that was remembered there was just another step towards proving Luke's guilt!

Compare the lies you think the Brother told to the conflicting info given by ALL the others. It may just look quite different to you

Who wasn't lying?

[jixy]

  no it wasnt...

If we cannot rely on a 'Campaigner' who has written a book about the case, where do you get your inside knowledge from then?

You are wrong