Author Topic: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views  (Read 213682 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1065 on: February 08, 2021, 05:37:43 PM »
’Claiming killer innocent part of search for truth‘ - May 2007
No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice, by Sandra Lean is published by Diggory Press, Exposure Publishing, priced 11.99. It is available to order on www.amazon.co.uk
https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/claiming-killer-innocent-part-search-truth-2453025

Sandra Lean
My goal is to help share stories of people who have suffered injustice and in so doing, to alert an unsuspecting public that the same could happen to any one of them.

Since 2003, I have researched and written about cases of wrongful conviction and factual innocence. I have tried to assist a number of people over the years and campaign, write articles, etc, wherever I am able to help. Following the completion of my Honours degree in Social Sciences (Psychology and Sociology) in 2000, I obtained a Specialist Paralegal Qualification in Criminal Law in 2010, via Criminal Law Training and Strathclyde University.

I completed a PhD in 2012, (the thesis title being "Hidden in Plain View,") which studied the factors which lead to wrongful convictions and why ordinary people are completely unaware of these factors.

My first book, "No Smoke, the Shocking Truth about British Justice," was published by Checkpoint Press, Ireland in 2008. My second book, "Innocents Betrayed" was published by NGU Books in 2018 and I am currently working on a third.

I am also a fully qualified Clinical Hypnotherapist and Hypno-analyst, with a long term interest in alternative healthcare and Personal Development.

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-sandra-lean-4b499a43
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 05:40:42 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1066 on: February 08, 2021, 06:09:17 PM »
What was the name of the publisher Sandra Lean contacted?

Will be interesting to learn if the six other families” who “are immediately affected” were contacted “as a matter of courtesy”

Sandra Lean today claims here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456210.html#msg456210
I made a mistake 12 years ago - I've put my hands up to that, I've withdrawn the book and I've publicly apologised.”

Is the “mistake 12 years ago” to which she refers to above in relation to having written Stephen Kelly as opposed to Leonard Kelly?

Excerpt from No Smoke by Sandra Lean
Several witnesses were identified as having been on the path at the critical time that evening. In total there were a minimum of five – John [Name removed], Gordon [Name removed], his father, David [Name removed], Stephen Kelly, a witness who claimed to have heard a disturbance behind the wall, and the "mystery man" seen following Jodi onto the path.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

Sandra Lean claims here:http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199
I apologise for any confusion - No Smoke was published more than 12 years ago, before I had access to all of the case papers and I haven't read it/referenced it for many years. The book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time. I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn.

“The reference to Stephen Kelly is clearly a typo, since the sentence goes on to describe him as "a witness who claimed to have heard a disturbance behind the wall."
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

The book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time.”


Court transcripts for what case?

Sandra Lean claims today: “l would like to stress that it was not, and never has been, my intention to mislead. The two errors cited here are simply that - errors which were not picked up at the editing stage[/i].

How does

the book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time

fit with

the two errors cited here are simply that - errors which were not picked up at the editing stage?”


Reminds me of word salad

The term word salad refers to a random words or phrases linked together in an often unintelligible manner. Often, a listener is unable to understand the meaning or purpose of the phrase
On 4th October 2019 Sandra Lean stated,

I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn”

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 06:12:43 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1067 on: February 08, 2021, 10:32:44 PM »
’Rogues Gallery’ by Stephen Manning

This webpage is reluctantly, but necessarily dedicated to those incorrigible individuals who prey upon the unsuspecting, the trusting, and the naive in order to further their own less-than-admirable interests”

http://www.checkpoint.ie/roguesgallery.html


So who did Sandra Lean allegedly contact on 4th Oct 2019 ?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 11:14:35 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1068 on: February 09, 2021, 09:45:08 AM »
Exposure Publishing is listed as of 1st May 2007

Diggory press also goes by the name of exposure publishing apparently

http://www.checkpoint.ie/roguesgallery.html

One author allegedly stated,

In view of my clear intention to defraud me, I have repeatedly asked her to delist my books with any retail outlets. This she refuse to do claiming that she has a great number of my books printed and which need to be paid for. I have asked for photographic evidence of this, yet she will supply none. Given that she runs a print-on-demand service this is obviously a ruse, and in any case royalties would still be due under such an agreement even if it did exist.
I would be greatly pleased it the court would order Ms Franklin to delist my books from all sale outlets.’
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 09:56:40 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1069 on: February 09, 2021, 09:58:33 AM »
Did Sandra Lean lie when she made claim she had pulled ‘No Smoke’ from publication?

Has anyone followed this up?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-Smoke-Sandra-Lean/dp/1906628009

On 4th October 2019 Sandra Lean stated,

I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn”

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

If Sandra Lean contacted the publishers on 4th October 2019 in order for her book to be withdrawn from sale - who did she speak to and was ‘No Smoke’ withdrawn?

If as has been suggested - by Stephen Manning on his ‘Rogues Gallery’ site - Diggory press or Exposure publishing haven’t been taking any notice of these types of requests how certain is Sandra Lean her request has been carried out?

’DIGGORY POKERY’
http://www.checkpoint.ie/DiggoryPokery.pdf
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 10:05:47 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1070 on: February 09, 2021, 10:17:20 AM »
The following can be found here
https://podpeep.blogspot.com/2007/12/news-diggory-veinglory.html#.YCJhgRrfWhA

‘A few days ago I posted about a query on the excellent PODdy mouth blogsite regarding Raider Publishers. A follow up comment was later posted by “Wordsmith”. I would like to take this opportunity to reply to the comments left.

“Wordsmith” wrote,

‘Mick, you should be more careful to find out the facts before you write things such as this. Do you just believe everything you read on the internet without checking it out for yourself first?! Surely this is the wise thing to do?You say the ‘wonderful and decicated‘ man you mention is a ‘champion’ for author’s rights BUT this man is a competitor of Diggory’s so it is in his interest to diss their reputation! Also he makes some very dumb and also contradictory claims in his complaint. You can be sure that IF he had a case this would have been through the courts already. To date, Diggory have not been taken to court by anyone, (these facts are easily verifiable), far less had any judgment against them, so how could any author be ‘screwed’ over in the British law courts? It is just more lies by this so-called authors champion, very easy to say and to damage a company’s reputaton, but impossible to actually backup! In fact easy to prove its a lie.It is very easy to cry ‘wolf’, but no proof has been provided anywhere he actually tells the truth on anything. In fact there is actually plenty of evidence he is talking nonsense. He claims he has a long list of authors but he has said that for many months and it is just what HE says. You believe him at your peril for he makes some really ludicrous claims such as them making secret isbns and so on. How can you even do this?!! It is impossible. I feel very sorry for Diggory Press.
January 15, 2008 8:11 AM

‘Thank you “Wordsmith” for your comments. Firstly, let me point out that I stand corrected. Currently, as of this month, no formal action by Stephen Manning of Checkpoint Press, by himself, or on behalf of any authors has reached the British courts as a class action against Diggory Press in the uk. However, what cannot be in dispute is that writers through a number of well know on-line forums have expressed complaints about their treatment by Diggory Press. Through 2007, and in particular on the BooksandTales POD writers forum, an unseemly tirade of exchanges ensued, with claims and counter-claims . Few casual forum visitors could possibly have avoided it. I have rightly edited my original posting, and this reflects the situation, that there remains questions about this whole affair, and any writer considering POD publishing would have reservations about placing their work with Diggory Press. Some writers may concur with “Wordsmith’s” view that Stephen Manning has been unfair to Diggory. They may even feel that this view is the majority view. This is not entirely my view, by any means.

To any perspective POD author, who has carefully thought about publishing through the self-publishing/subsidy channel, they would probably be familiar with the Predators&Editors site and forum. This is a site which is well respected by writers who publish both through traditional channels and POD. Let me remind writers and “Wordsmith”, that this site currently classifies DiggoryPress as “Not Recommended”. Hmm…they must believe everything they read on the Internet too, like me, huh, “Wordsmith”?

Most writers who write and are published still have to hold down full time jobs. This is the honest reality of the field of writing. Most of them work for companies in many varying industries and services. Most of these companies in the normal course of business will have customers, some elated with the service they receive, some quietly satisfied, and there will be those in a natural minority who are not satisfied, perhaps they are even deeply unsatisfied and aggrieved. From Stephen Manning’s input on his own site and various forums, I think its fair to say which category he would have an affinity with.

Regarding the above, let me draw “Wordsmith” to what I said in my original posting, in case he thinks I am unfairly taking sides, or foolishly jumping on an Internet victim bandwagon.
The reality I have found is that most authors who pay for a POD services get what they pay for, and if they complain afterwards, its usually because they went into the POD process naive and as author Mark Levine might say, didn’t read “The Fine Print of Self Publishing”.

Let me take this opportunity to set things clear and straight. I have never met Stephen Manning, though he has been a part of posting threads on forums that I have posted to. It is my opinion that Stephen Manning feels deeply aggrieved about his experience with Diggory Press and does believe he is championing other authors causes. As I have not met him, I do not know if some of his motivation is revenge, though I have seen countless blog postings and forum postings from aggrieved authors who have expressed exactly that feeling and motivation.

Quite frankly this whole business has taken up far too much time and bytes on the Internet over the past year, and as “Wordsmith” rightly pointed out in his comment, until and if an action ever comes about we can all hold our own opinions, as nothing will truly be proven as fact unless it lands in a court of law.

I would urge any perspective author to research any POD publisher they are submitting to and while you can be guided by the forums and other writers, it is you who will have to put things in perspective and decide what you are looking for from a publisher.

I have always stated that what appears on this blogsite are my views and opinions and I am happy to stand corrected. I would like my own right of reply in regards “Wordsmith’s” comments.

To date, Chechpoint Press have listed a half dozen or so books, so I would not describe them as a competitor of Diggory. I’m sure they are quaking in the boots at the rise of the Manning empire.

I entirely agree regarding the ISBN issue. Having self published under my own publishing imprint, once assigned, ISBN’s are simply not transferable. This is ludicrous as each ISBN is unique and identifies the publisher with the first few digits.

I don’t do nicknames or pseudonyms, I express my opinions under my own name. While I may be critical, I will not engage in abuse or personally derisory remarks.

Let me leave you with “Wordsmith’s” own words speaking about Stephen Manning on Emily Veinglory’s blogsite some weeks ago regarding this very same issue in case there is any confusion as to where he stands;

The guy is obviously not right in the head, he makes some really ludicrous claims. I feel very sorry for Diggory Press. The guy has made similar complaints about other companies before, and seems to be a serial nightmare customer from hell. According to Diggory’s website, they are not currently taking on any new projects as they are at full capacity, but their output continues nonetheless with their latest batch of books brought out in December.



Hi Folks - I thought it might be appropriate to respond to the posts attacking my credibility here.

I am Stephen Manning - as mentioned above - and I strongly suspect that 'anonymous', 'wordsmith', and possibly also 'barry k' are some of the latest pseudonyms for Mrs Rosalind Franklin of Diggory Press.

Others on the web include 'Auntie Carol 123', 'Joy', 'Florida Oranges' etc - and I'm quite sure there are many more. One can usually identify Mrs Franklin in these posts by the attacks on myself, and the questionable defense of her three interchangeable businesses; Diggory Press, Exposure Publishing, and Meadow Books..

I paste here a copy of the recent Private Eye Magazine article, so that readers may see the truth for themselves: (The original can be viewed at the link soon to be posted below - along with other proofs of Mrs Franklin's duplicity)

’DIGGORY POKERY’
http://www.checkpoint.ie/DiggoryPokery.pdf
WOULD-BE author Jack Havana (his pen-name) decided to self-publish his book after reading a website recommendation in the Sunday Times "In Gear" section last summer. "A self-publishing service I recommend is Diggory Press, which charges £30 for setup and reasonable fees for printing on demand," wrote columnist Nigel Powell.

Six months later, Jack is more than £600 out of pocket and doesn't have a single copy of his book to show for it. He says Diggory Press director Rosalind Franklin was initially enthusiastic and took his £160 for setup, printing and listing on Amazon but she then stopped replying promptly to messages and, despite attempts to contact her by recorded mail, stopped replying altogether. Jack is now trying to claim his money back through the courts.

The Eye knows of at least 17 writers pursuing Diggory Press in the small claims court, for sums between £200 and £5,000.

One author, Sandra Lean, has received plenty of feedback from readers, but she says Franklin has refused to pay royalties or to provide accounts or sales figures. The authors are asking the court to order printers Lightning Source to open up their books and thus reveal what royalties they are owed.

The Eye contacted Diggory Press and asked: why will you not give authors detailed sales figures or accounts? Why will you not remove authors' books from your website when they ask? Have you withheld any royalties owed? Why have you been so difficult to contact/failed to reply to correspondence? Diggory Press failed to reply to this correspondence either and answer came there none...

'Bookworm'
Source: PRIVATE EYE - No 1202 - 25/1/08


I have tried to maintain some sort of dignity in the face of months of frustration, as I attempt to secure justice in the face of theft and fraud by Mrs Franklin. But time after time Mrs Franklin has shown herself willing and able to stoop to the lowest levels of malice and deception in order to undermine the integrity of our complaints against her.

I regret that myself and others have been drawn into public exchanges with a person of this caliber - but after spending months trying to reason with Mrs Franklin through the Police, Lawyers, the Trading Standards people etc.. and to be continually met with abuse and contempt - our only remaining option is to sue her in court.

As you can see, seventeen Court Claims - possibly more now - have have already been registered against Diggory and Mrs Franklin in the British Courts (as of Jan 24th 2008), and no amount of lies, abuses, attempted deceptions, or other personal attacks on myself or other complainants will change this fact.

See you in Court Rosalind.

PS - Any authors who have been defrauded by Diggory should email me at stmphd@mail.com with their details, and we will do what we can to help and advise you.

Stephen T Manning PhD

More here https://podpeep.blogspot.com/2007/12/news-diggory-veinglory.html#.YCJhvBrfWhB

My name is Gill Harley and I'm the author of Lord of the Dance and one of The Seventeen authors taking Diggory to court.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 10:47:27 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1071 on: February 09, 2021, 10:58:07 AM »
Stephen Manning even gets a mention in Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

Special thanks to Stephen Manning, of Checkpoint Publishing. Without his encouragement and enthusiasm, I may not have been in a position to undertake this research.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9834706.pdf

Stephen Manning is quoted here https://wondereraround.wordpress.com/tag/diggory-press-court-case/
as ‘the evil liar, ‘Dr’ S T Manning’

truthwatcher
@truthwatcher33
Dr. Stephen T Manning, Ph.D. Is An Academic Fraud: http://bit.ly/au9nRd via
@addthis
10:04 AM · Feb 24, 2010·Twitter Web Client

https://mobile.twitter.com/truthwatcher33/status/9569923960

Would be interested to hear what Sandra Lean says about all this?
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 11:07:48 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1072 on: February 09, 2021, 11:19:17 AM »
So who did Sandra Lean allegedly contact on 4th Oct 2019 ?

According to a Jools Pirog in response to the following:

@truthwatcher33
Stephen T Manning & Checkpoint Press Lies & Hypocrisy On Alleged Diggory Price Overpricing http://bit.ly/cXjPUh via
@AddToAny
10:34 PM · Mar 4, 2010·Twitter Web Client


Jools Pirog
@JoolsPirog
Aug 4, 2018
Replying to
@truthwatcher33
 and
@AddToAny
Well #SophieMerlo who changed her name by #deedpoll from Rosalind Franklin Nee Rosalind O’Neill, it’s you who was found guilty

https://mobile.twitter.com/truthwatcher33/status/9994136274
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1073 on: February 09, 2021, 11:40:38 AM »
“Checkpoint press Testimonials and links http://www.checkpointpress.com/testimonials.html

The following are firsthand comments from clients who have used our publishing services

Cover looks great Stephen.. Thanks for all your hard work getting this produced. I really like this layout - it’s better than the original by far. Dr Sandra Lean, Scotland (No Smoke)


Sandra Leans ‘thesis’ was submitted in February 2012

When did Sandra Lean write/post this comment for Stephen Manning/Checkpoint press to be included as a testimonial?

And did Sandra Lean contact Stephen T Manning on the 4th October 2019 or someone else - or did she not contact anyone?

The following link is to checkpoint press on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Law-checkpoint-press-Books/s?rh=n%3A10777%2Cp_30%3Acheckpoint+press

5 books are by Stephen T Manning
1 book by Sandra Lean
&
1 book by Joe Burns

Joe Burns https://m.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR2uYeRQy_c-577sLndfWYaS5TRhAMCVn4_yJT_dHoXBOOcCYkYasZZnHN0&v=PlXmFD1GIfY&feature=youtu.be

Excerpts from Amazon.com Reviews’ reproduced by Stephen Manning here http://www.checkpointpress.com/NSNewTitleInfoPlusReviews.pdf
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 12:11:33 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1074 on: February 09, 2021, 12:14:12 PM »
On 4th October 2019 Sandra Lean stated,

I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn”

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

More Smoke and Mirrors by Sandra Lean  *&^^&

“I apologise for any confusion - No Smoke was published more than 12 years ago, before I had access to all of the case papers and I haven't read it/referenced it for many years. The book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time. I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn.
I would like to stress that it was not, and never has been, my intention to mislead....

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 12:17:53 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1075 on: February 09, 2021, 12:34:01 PM »
Stephen Manning was released from prison in May 2017 https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=862585213888462&_rdr

Special thanks to Stephen Manning, of Checkpoint Publishing. Without his encouragement and enthusiasm, I may not have been in a position to undertake this research.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9834706.pdf

Manning, currently with an address in Ballyhaunis and formerly with addresses in Achill, Ballinrobe and Belcarra, was jailed for a breach of Section 6 of the Public Order Act – which is for the offence of threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour in a public place.
https://www.mayonews.ie/news/29988-general-election-candidate-jailed-for-public-order-breach

« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 12:44:11 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1076 on: February 09, 2021, 03:24:27 PM »
Sandra Lean
My goal is to help share stories of people who have suffered injustice and in so doing, to alert an unsuspecting public that the same could happen to any one of them.

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-sandra-lean-4b499a43

Did Sandra Lean share Stephen Manning’s story?

https://www.mayonews.ie/election-2016-2/27362-security-remove-candidate-from-mayo-election-count?utm_content=buffer44846&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1077 on: February 09, 2021, 06:50:53 PM »
Sandra Lean claims today,

I’d never have believed that simply telling the truth could be twisted so far out of recognition’



What’s this all about Sandra?

This is interesting

According to convicted but exonerated murderer Michael O’Brien (one of the so called Cardiff Newsagent 3)

On the 27th February 2014 he publicly stated,

Sandra Lean has done so much for victims of miscarriages of justice and I am sickened that anyone could even suggest she was responsible for Simon Hall’s death so whoever is responsible for these malicious lies had better stop. Hope your health gets better soon Sandra thinking of you. XX’

Did Michael O’Brien make the above up ?

Who allegedly told Michael O’Brien between the 23rd and the 27th February 2014 Sandra Lean ‘was responsible for Simon Hall’s death’ ?



Sandra Lean also states,

One tiny grain of truth submerged in a deluge of half truths and outright lies - there’s no way to counter that...’

I remain of the firm view you are intentionally deceptive Sandra.


Here for context
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221492945085639&id=1011563515

Sandra Lean
My goal is to help share stories of people who have suffered injustice and in so doing, to alert an unsuspecting public that the same could happen to any one of them.

Since 2003, I have researched and written about cases of wrongful conviction and factual innocence.

Sandra I view you as a promoter of innocence fraud.

What happened to your podcast on Matthew Hamlen?
”Horrifyingly, the meticulous grandmother, who’d stayed glamorous into her sunset years, had her trousers around her knees.
Her underpants had also partially been pulled down.”

(Real People 4 Oct 2018 - Murder Map)

Matthew Hamlen said he could not be sure if he had sex with Georgina Edmonds
https://www.hampshirechronicle.co.uk/news/14265690.matthew-hamlen-said-he-could-not-be-sure-if-he-had-sex-with-georgina-edmonds/

‘Long Road to Justice’ ?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 08:28:29 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1078 on: February 10, 2021, 10:56:07 AM »
The judge said he believed Mitchell "found evil attractive" and thought there might be a "perverted glamour in doing something wicked."

He said, "I do not feel able to ignore the fact that there was a degree of resemblance between the injuries inflicted on Jodi and those shown in the Marilyn Manson paintings of Elizabeth Short that we saw."
https://search.blabbermouth.net/news/marilyn-manson-inspired-killer-sentenced-to-20-years-in-prison/

"What I do know is that it is all about the education that parents give their children and the influences they receive, not putting the blame elsewhere"
Marilyn Manson aka Brian Hugh Warner
https://www.scotsman.com/whats-on/arts-and-entertainment/i-did-not-inspire-jodis-killer-says-rock-star-marilyn-manson-2480851

’He “Horrifically Abused Me for Years”: Evan Rachel Wood and Other Women Make Allegations of Abuse Against Marilyn Manson’
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/02/he-horrifically-abused-me-for-years-evan-rachel-wood-and-other-women-make-allegations-of-abuse-against-marilyn-manson
« Last Edit: February 10, 2021, 11:30:36 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1079 on: February 10, 2021, 04:08:38 PM »
9th Feb 2021
Sandra Lean
stated,

I’d never have believed that simply telling the truth could be twisted so far out of recognition’

 &%%6
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation