26 August 2021
Amaral dismisses Brueckner's involvement in Maddie's disappearance
This is a thesis defended by Gonçalo since the beginning of the investigation and now comes to say that Christian Brueckner "has nothing to do with maddie's disappearance".
"In the early hours, even before we distrusted the parents, we received a list of pedophiles who lived in the area and Brueckner was on that list.
But how did someone break into the apartment without leaving fingerprints or other evidence," the former inspector questioned.
During the interview, Amaral also said that the investigation should have been more complete and that "it was a mistake" not to consider the hypothesis of murder, but "the superiors wanted us to approach the case as if something had been missing." Leia mais em:
https://www.novagente.pt/maddie-goncalo-amaral-diz-que-sequestro-foi-simulado-pelos-paisAmaral seems determined on insisting that Brueckner was eliminated from the inquiry early days and while on his watch as as coordinator.
I fail to see why - even if Brueckner had been interviewed ??? back then Amaral is so insistent on his innocence.
At that time although unsuspected, he was already guilty of the horrific rape for which he was later convicted and further intelligence and some paedophile convictions were not known about in 2007 because they had not yet happened, but we know about them now.
Yet Amaral is still defending Brueckner on the basis that he was allowed to slip through the PJ investigation which Amaral coordinated back in the day.
All I can say is that those who have interviewed Amaral over the years have done so in a demonstrably anodyne fashion.