Thanks for that, Carana.
It was your meticulous work carried out in a much earlier thread in the effort to explain DNA as simply as possible to the forum which gave me an inkling of understanding of the way in which it had been misinterpreted in Madeleine's case.
With absolutely no disrespect intended to present members it also suggested to me that a little knowledge is indeed a dangerous thing.
Take for example the total inability of the Amaral team (and later, numerous internet detectives) to understand that the hair found in Burgau had nothing to do with anyone in the McCann group.
DNA is a complex science for most of us and should not be bandied about on internet fora by folk who demonstrate even less understanding of it than I have.
I think you epitomise the intended ethos of this forum. Always straight and to the point and always well researched.
The result for the two hairs found in found in Bergau was;
"The Haplotype identified by the letter S, present in 2 samples, (apartment in Burgau), and identical to that of Jane Michelle Tanner (JT), meaning those samples were from that person or individuals of the same maternal bloodline."
The hairs found in 5A were subjected to the same tests, and the results were similarly worded;
"The Haplotype identified by the letter O. present in 2 samples, and identical to that of Russell James O'Brien (RJB), meaning those samples were from that person or individuals of the same maternal bloodlines."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PORTUGUESE-FORENSIC.htmThe only difference I can see is that Jane wasn't expected to be in Bergau, while it was known that Russell was in 5A. There's no difference in the forensic tests and results.