I've been looking at that paper mrswah....
I find the searches most revealing.....
At Line 267 of the prosecution chart
at 15.00 pm on 21 December 2010, Tabak searched the words
‘Extradition of Dutchman’
‘Jo Yeates’
I wonder if that was all he searched , it implys that by just having those two searches, I cant see him just doing two searches...
If he was so worried about being caught, you think he'd have spent alot more time doing these searches, It doesn't say whether the searches yielded results???
I've just done a search for "Extradition Dutchman" for the relevant time and the results were:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=extradition+dutchman&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=1006&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A20%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max%3A22%2F12%2F2010&tbm=#tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min:20%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max:22%2F12%2F2010&q=extradition+dutchman+
The only dutchman I could find at the time, going around the houses was........
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=extradition+dutchman&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=1006&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A20%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max%3A22%2F12%2F2010&tbm=#tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min:20%2F12%2F2010%2Ccd_max:22%2F12%2F2010&q=Joran+van+der+Sloot
The Process To Extradite Joran Van Der Sloot From Peru Has Begun!
http://perezhilton.com/tag/joran_van_der_sloot/#.WD6sd6KLRQNWas this whom Dr Vincent Tabak was looking for??
So did he go around the houses to find out about this Dutchman, or did he just do 2 searches, they obviously didn't have everything that Dr Vincent Tabak searched for or accessed on that day...
He was an avid weather watcher, it was something he looked at everyday:
Tabak: I always access the Internet for weather reports even whilst in Los Angeles. I had
my computers set up for that.
That is not there, on that day his weather search.... But it is the day after..
Plenty of people in the country were searching about Joanna Yeates, and as she was his next door neighbour I imagine he was doing the same..
Again if the defence had been furnished with the 1300 page document in ample time, they too would have found these searches not applicable..
All the prosecution needed to do was "Imply" that Dr Vincent Tabak was looking at extradition of a Dutchman, which I have said before, he could have easily stayed in Holland when he went to visit his family, if he had committed this crime..
Why search 2 days after she was missing, the relivance of the "extradition of Dutchman "... doesn't make sense..
If he had stayed in Holland when he was there in late December they would either have had the trial there, or insisted that he was returned after trial , to serve his sentence back in Holland...
The prosecution, allowed people to make a descision, based on cherry picking searches, which we have touched upon before, they do not prove intent....
Maybe he had been searching or reading about this dutchman whilst he was in America?
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/18/natalees-mom-to-van-der-sloot-i-cant-close-the-book/This had been an ongoing case.....
But.. the prosecution didn't show all of his searches....!!!
The Defence should have looked into this..??