I decided to go back to the Searches... and maybe look at them in a different way....
I think things are becoming clearer!!!!!
One thing we have to remember is that the Police say that they looked at more than one computer, laptops etc!!!!
Is the Devil and the detail going to rear it's head.....
I think it Just Might:
I want to deal with line 305..............
I think Line 305 is extremeley Interesting!!!!!
At Line 305 of the prosecution chart
PC Karen Thomas went to 44 Canynge Road to search
Now what reason do you think that PC Karen Thomas went to 44 Caynge Road to search???????
Think I'll do my usual and let CJ tell you............
From the Leveson Enquiry......
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Second-Witness-Statement-of-Christopher-Jefferies.pdfMy second statement to the police oil Wednesday 22 December 2010
,
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 1 provided a statement to the police who were at that
time searching the entire house and all the flats in it and taking statements from all tile
residents. I was not being treated as a suspect. At the time the police said to all of us
that if we subsequently remembered anything that could be material we should get
back in touch, That evening I remembered something else that I had not mentioned to
the police that I thought could possibly be material. This was that one evening, which
might have been Friday 17 December 2010, as I was coming back from fine gym at
about 9pm, I had parked my car on the road and was just walking through the gates of
the main driveway, when I became aware of what sounded like two or perhaps three
people leaving by the side gate on the other side of the house which I could not see a
there is a hedge in between and it was dark, I duly telephoned the police and relayed
this.
,
The next day, Wednesday 22 December 2010, the same officer who had taken my
first statement came back to my fiat and took a second statement about this. The
officer asked me if one of tile voices could have been a woman’s voice. I responded
that it could have been but that I could not say either way. The police have since
confirmed to me that the fact flint I gave a supplementary statement raised their
suspicions in relation to me. On the basis of what ensued, I believe it is likely that the
police passed these suspicions on to rite media.
So that's what he says....
Again lets break it down...........
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 1 provided a statement to tile police who were at that
time searching the entire house and all the flats in it and taking statements from all tile
residents. I was not being treated as a suspect
So As CJ stated the Police had taken witness Statements from Residents and SEARCHED all the Flats... on the 21st January 2011
Obviously without coming up with any evidence what so ever... But at this time they searched all the Residents Flats....
Now on line 292
At Line 292 of the prosecution chart
Tabak Googled the words
‘manslaughter sentencing’
Then he went to Wikipedia website to search the words
‘manslaughter in English law murder in English law’
Tabak left work at 5.06pm \on 22 Dec 2010
and at home he Googled
‘Los Angeles murder case’
Now I wondered what was Obviously Staring me in the face with this Time Line......
And I don't believe Anybody spotted it.... The Jury wouldn't know, And The defence didn't pick up on it.....
Tabak left work at 5.06pm \on 22 Dec 2010
Why did I find that Little Gem interesting?
Well DR Vincent Tabak Didn't leave for work Normally till around 9:00am
Defence Counsel: Turn to entry 11.
‘Entry 11- seen past the flat at 9.05 where Tanya had already left for work in a lift-share’.
Text message from Tabak: ‘Love you’.
Text answer from Tanja: Love you too. Pretty snow.
So here he is seen Leaving past the Flat at 9:05am... where he is seen is anyones guess???
Defence Counsel: What time do you leave for work?
Tabak: 9.00 am.
So He probably caught the 9:07am Train To Bath which would arrive at Bath Spa at 9:11 am
Sounds about correct....
BURO HAPPOLD OPENING TIMES ARE : 9:30am to 6:00 pm
Sounds like an average work day.....
Now the next bit is confusing.... WHY???
Tabak left work at 5.06pm \on 22 Dec 2010
Why would he leave work at:
(A): Such an odd time
(B): Before work had finished.....
See that sounds like someone who has a typical 9 to 5 job....
But we Know that he doesn't leave for work normally till 9:00am because his place of employment doesn't open till 9:30am
So he wouldn't finish work at 5:00pm it would be 6:00pm like the Opening times suggest!!!!!!!
By him supposedly leaving at 5:06 he would be able to catch the :
17:12
ON TIME
Bath Spa
17:31
ON TIME
Bristol Temple Meads
19m
Direct
OFF PEAK
Good timing... NOT!!
But I think he left work at his usual time of just after 6:00pm and would have caught the:
18:08
ON TIME
Bath Spa
18:28
ON TIME
Bristol Temple Meads
Which would coincide with the time he would normally reach home:
Timeline 45- Vincent Tabak’s journey home- 6.54 at Constitution Hill. Home just after
7pm by which time Tanja had already left. Text message to Tanja- ‘Just got home’.
No I'd think A man in Dr Vincent Tabak's position would more than likely spend longer at work than less time at work, seeing he has a responsible role....
Now lets go back to CJ:
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 1 provided a statement to tile police who were at that
time searching the entire house and all the flats in it and taking statements from all the
residents. I was not being treated as a suspect. At the time the police said to all of us
that if we subsequently remembered anything that could be material we should get
back in touch, That evening I remembered something else that I had not mentioned to
the police that I thought could possibly be material.
Now this is where CJ gives his Supplementary Statement.......
And the Police's Response is:
The next day, Wednesday 22 December 2010, the same officer who had taken my
first statement came back to my fiat and took a second statement about this. The
officer asked me if one of tile voices could have been a woman’s voice. I responded
that it could have been but that I could not say either way. The police have since
confirmed to me that the fact that I gave a supplementary statement raised their
suspicions in relation to me.
Now Again a telling Statement.....
The Police Spring into action and run around to CJ's to Talk to him about his supplementary statement!!!!
Notice the DATE!! 22nd Decemeber 2010
Now.... This is were that Little Devil pops it's Head Up!!!!
The next day, Wednesday 22 December 2010, the same officer who had taken my
first statement came back to my fiat and took a second statement about this.
Oh My.... I do believe I can here Alarm Bells!!!!
Tabak left work at 5.06pm \on 22 Dec 2010
and at home he Googled
‘Los Angeles murder case’
At Line 305 of the prosecution chart
PC Karen Thomas went to 44 Canynge Road to search
Now.... We Already Know that it was the 21st Dec 2010 that the Police:
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 1 provided a statement to tile police who were at that
thue searching the entire house and all the flats
The Flats had been searched on the 21st Dec 2010... so why go back to "SEARCH" on the 22nd Dec 2010....
Another telling slip up (IMO)
I'll Let CJ tell you:.......
The next day, Wednesday 22 December 2010, the same officer who had taken my
first statement came back to my fiat and took a second statement about this.
And in the Honour of CJ,.. We see him sat talking to the Police whilst the dog sniffs about.....
So.... I Believe It was NOT Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat that was searched on 22nd Dec 2010...
It was CJ's... and the entry was for CJ......
Lets not forget : They thought that CJ had colluded with Dr Vincent Tabak....
And with CJ's Supplementary Statement the Police russhed round to see him....
Why Would they need to SEARCH Dr Vincent Tabaks Flat again on the 22nd Dec 2010.. when they already had just done it the day before!!!!
They needed to search CJ's Flat because they suddenly had a suspect in there eyes!!!!!!!!!
So I do believe the entry line 305.... Is an UNTRUE (IMO)
As CJ' Says:
The police have since
confirmed to me that the fact that I gave a supplementary statement raised their
suspicions in relation to me.
So.... Definetaley CJ who's home the Police Searched on the 22nd Dec 2010....
No reason whatsoever for the Police to search Dr Vincent Tabak AGAIN on this date as he DID NOT make a SUPPLEMENTARY statement till 31st dec 2010.......
Strange that showed up as a Visit to Dr Vincnet Tabak.... wonder what TIME that Visit was at !!!!!
SO I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT PC KAREN THOMAS VISITED DR VINCENT TABAK ON THE 22ND DECEMBER 2010!!!
And always in my opinion!!!!
If you look at the screenshots... Saturday is the only day BURO HAPPOLD Close At 5:00pm!!!
22nd December 2010 was a WEDNESDAY!!!!
