Author Topic: The Defence Will State Their Case  (Read 599779 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1770 on: September 28, 2018, 02:35:17 PM »
I wonder what his state of mind was when he was googling the differences between murder and manslaughter... Clearly had his defence worked out before way before he was even arrested.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1771 on: September 28, 2018, 02:48:42 PM »
He pleaded guilty to having downloaded child porn images. He admitted Killing Joanna Yeates. I really do not care about his state of mind. The people who support this beast should be ashamed of themselves - it says more about them than it does him.

And you support other convicted sadistic murderers because.....?
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:38:14 PM by John »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1772 on: September 28, 2018, 03:02:25 PM »
Tabak confessed to heinous crimes and was convicted on direct evidence, Luke Mitchell claims innocence and was convicted on circumstantial evidence. Big difference!
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:39:16 PM by John »

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1773 on: September 28, 2018, 03:05:37 PM »
Sorry I have no time for people who support confessed killers/paedophiles. Please carry on supporting him, but don't expect me to acknowledge you.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1774 on: September 28, 2018, 03:08:03 PM »
He pleaded guilty to having downloaded child porn images. He admitted Killing Joanna Yeates. I really do not care about his state of mind. The people who support this beast should be ashamed of themselves - it says more about them than it does him.

Tell me what do you think his state of mind was when he downloaded such disgusting images and looked at them? Clearly a paedophile as well as a murderer - who has more than just one victim.

Unless you are part of the brigade that says they are only pictures   yeah with real children at the other side of the lense!
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:39:53 PM by John »

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1775 on: September 28, 2018, 03:09:54 PM »
Tabak confessed to heinous crimes and was convicted on direct evidence, Luke Mitchell claims innocence and was convicted on circumstantial evidence. Big difference!

Huge difference justsaying. Some people will argue black is white if they dont like the person saying it . Dont waste any time explaining
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:40:26 PM by John »

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1776 on: September 28, 2018, 03:14:02 PM »
Huge difference justsaying. Some people will argue black is white if they dont like the person saying it . Dont waste any time explaining

Could not agree more. If we were both on here supporting Tabak I am sure she would have something different to say. I cannot understand how people can support a confessed paedophile and confessed killer, it certainly does say something about them. And I really do not care less what people think about that.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:40:56 PM by John »

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1777 on: September 28, 2018, 03:15:05 PM »
Unless you are part of the brigade that says they are only pictures   yeah with real children at the other side of the lense!

Disgusting, those people need to realise what those children went through for someone else's immoral, sexual gratification!

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1778 on: September 28, 2018, 03:16:15 PM »
 8@??)( 

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1779 on: September 28, 2018, 03:24:12 PM »
Disgusting, those people need to realise what those children went through for someone else's immoral, sexual gratification!

to overlook and even defend such a sick activity speaks volumes about the person who can do that

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1780 on: September 28, 2018, 03:30:28 PM »
Disgusting, those people need to realise what those children went through for someone else's immoral, sexual gratification!

The point I make is to do with whether or not he is guilty of Murder... And again unless I see what the evidence is supposed to be for his prosecution back in 2015, it's difficult to comment....

If he is guilty of one crime , charge him for that.... Just because you don't like someone , doesn't mean you put them away for Murder....

Dr Vincent Tabak just plead guilty again.... the images amounts changed... The prosecution of him from the discovery of the images took rather a lengthy period...  4 years later... makes it seem as trumped up as the murder charge....

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1781 on: September 28, 2018, 03:37:59 PM »
The point I make is to do with whether or not he is guilty of Murder... And again unless I see what the evidence is supposed to be for his prosecution back in 2015, it's difficult to comment....

If he is guilty of one crime , charge him for that.... Just because you don't like someone , doesn't mean you put them away for Murder....

Dr Vincent Tabak just plead guilty again.... the images amounts changed... The prosecution of him from the discovery of the images took rather a lengthy period...  4 years later... makes it seem as trumped up as the murder charge....

Nine, to deny this charge is an insult to those children who were in those disgusting images. They already had him for murder, he was going no where, which means there is a reason they charged him with those vile images, that reason is because they found them on his computer.  He pleaded guilty, he never denied downloading them, he is vile paedophile. And quite frankly I am shocked that anyone would defend such a depraved beast.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 09:43:19 PM by John »

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1782 on: September 28, 2018, 04:04:03 PM »
Nine, to deny this charge is an insult to those children who were in those disgusting images. They already had him for murder, he was going no where, which means there is a reason they charged him with those vile images, that reason is because they found them on his computer.  He pleaded guilty, he never denied downloading them, he is vile paedophile. And quite frankly I am shocked that anyone would defend such a depraved beast.

It's not so much as denying a charge as understanding a charge... And know from where they came... The reason I believe that its as made up as the murder charge, is because Ann Reddrop failed to prosecute him, in a timely manner... And we know that she has been involved with prosecuting people before for such images....

I find it difficult to believe, they waited so long.... I find it odd the image amount changed...  I find it odd that the  charge is again between dates , from 2009 to 2011....

I understand what you mean and by saying your quite shocked i know where you are coming from... I have to try set aside his other charges at the mo as I am trying to point out that someone else could easily have gotten away with Murder...

I believe the child abuse images, where meant to add to turning him into a monster ,so no-one would ever question this case....

There are plenty of ethical problems I have contemplated about him... And I have to stick with my belief that the Justice System has to be fair.... My family is mixed raced...( So you understand) If he turned out to be a racist, I cannot do anything about that.....  And if he incites racism, charge him for that.... But you cannot put anyone away for Murder when they haven't done it.... leaving the real killer free.... You cannot put a person away for murder, because they have committed another crime....

So asking me about the child abuse images is pointless to a degree, because I have always stated that it was the lack of defence and witness's that had me looking at this case again... And for 7 years now I have not been happy with the outcome of that trial...

A trial for any crime should be about TRUTH AND JUSTICE....   it's as simple as that..

I just like fair....




Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1783 on: September 28, 2018, 04:17:40 PM »
How do you know the number of images changed? You're getting your info from news reports. Can you not just accept that it may have been a misprint or the journalist got the numbers wrong. That is the problem when you rely on news reports, they're not always accurate.

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1784 on: September 28, 2018, 04:22:27 PM »
How do you know the number of images changed? You're getting your info from news reports. Can you not just accept that it may have been a misprint or the journalist got the numbers wrong. That is the problem when you rely on news reports, they're not always accurate.

This entire trial is based on reports on the news and twitter.... This entire case is based on reports from the news and twitter...

This entire case is like some drama that was written by someone... No-one can get any info about this trial... No-one says anything new about this case.... No-one knows whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak is actually in prison.. No one can get a straight answer....

But coming back to the images and changing amounts.... who's to say that the court report about him even going to Court over the images is true??

We don't know...  We do not know if anything said about this case is true....

Edit.... Not forgetting facebooks contribution to this case!