Countdown To Murder10:54 of video... DCI Phil Jones
Whilst he was in America, he visited escorts and he was searching for escorts, whilst he was in California, and also we know on a business trip to Newcastle, that from a business telephone that he was using, contacted an escort agency, in the Newcastle area.
Which Newcastle where??
Newcastle, Kwazulu Natal, South Africa
Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
New Castle, Indiana, America
New Castle, Pennsylvania, America
Newcastle West , County Limerick in place
Newcastle, County Dublin , town in South County Dublin
Newcastle, County Galway
Newcastle, County Tipperary
Newcastle, County Wicklow , town in County Wicklow
Newcastle, Oldcastle, County Meath
England
Newcastle, Herefordshire
Newcastle, Shropshire (Newcastle on Clun), town in the district of South Shropshire
Wales
Little Newcastle (Casnewydd-Bach), Pembrokeshire
Newcastle, Bridgend , Glamorgan
Newcastlstle, County Downe Emlyn , Ceredigion place between (Cardiganshire) and Carmarthenshire
Newcastle, Monmouthshire , town in Monmouthshire
U.S.A.
New Castle, Alabama, Jefferson County
Newcastle, Arkansas, Johnson Township
Newcastle, California, city in Placer County
New Castle, Colorado, in Garfield County Municipality
New Castle Hundred, a unified district in New Castle County, Delaware
New Castle, Delaware, city of New Castle County – and County of New Castle
New Castle, Illinois, Carrier Mills Township
New Castle, Kentucky, city in Henry County
Newcastle, Maine, town in Lincoln County – part of Damariscotta-Newcastle
New Castle, Missouri, Jefferson Township
Newcastle, Nebraska , city in Dixon County
New Castle, New Hampshire , city in Rockingham County
New Castle, New York , town in Westchester County
Newcastle Township, Coshocton County, Ohio, city in Coshocton County
New Castle, Ohio, Belmont County
Newcastle, Oklahoma, city in McClain County
New Castle, North Carolina, Wilkes County
New Castle Township, Pennsylvania, in Schuylkill County town
South Newcastle, Pennsylvania, Lawrence County
Newcastle, Texas, city in Young County
Newcastle, Utah, a unified district in Iron County
New Castle, Virginia, town in Craig County
Newcastle, Washington State, city in King County
Newcastle, Wyoming, city in Weston County
Canada – Newcastle, New Brunswick , a district in the Canadian city Miramichi
Jamaica – Newcastle
Barbados – Newcastle
Australia
Newcastle Waters, Northern Territory
Nothing is clearly defined, it is just left up your imagination to fill in the pieces, Clarity is needed.... This information that DCI Phil Jones has decided to share with us, was neither used in court or it''s sources were never proven... Newcastle... I presume most would think Newcastle England... But it doesn't have to be, Dr Vincent Tabak travels worldwide with the job he does and therefore Newcastle could be anywhere...
The business phone that he used... Was it one provided by Buro Happold, or a seperate phone that he had and that he used only for business, or did he use this mobile phone for other purposes??....
It was never established at trial which phone any texts came from, with the text messages playing a crucial part in this case, we need to establish, which phone sent which message, but there is no distinction between phones that Dr Vincent Tabak, may or may not have used....
What other information was held on the business phone that DCI Phil Jones speaks of??
It extremely important... A time line was established for Dr Vincent Tabak's movement based on what I believed at the time his PRIVATE mobile phone... There where gaps that the prosecution have let us know... There was a gap of an hour that apparently Dr Vincent Tabak sat in his Flat with the body of Joanna Yeates....
If the business phone was not introduced into trial, then we have no idea of it's contents, we have no idea, if there are phone calls or text messages at the relevant time, again putting Dr Vincent Tabak's testimony into question...
If Dr Vincent Tabak has no recollection of aiding CJ on that Saturday morning, what else has he forgotten about,... No witness's were called that could place Dr Vincent Tabak anywhere, yes we had statements read out, but nothing verified these statements...
What did Dr Vincent Tabak do on that weekend??
Firstly we need to establish which phone the Police gathered their information from?? Or as suggested by DCI Phil Jones it was two phones, Is the information we know of a mixture from the two phones?
How bored was Dr Vincent Tabak, bored with still doing work, when he would rather be at a party with Tanja?
No-one has questioned why Dr Vincent Tabak didn't attend Tanja's work party, many time people take their partners to such an event, we have assumed again that it was strictly for employees seeing as Dr Vincent Tabak didn't go... But what if he simply had more work to complete, he had after all not long returned from America on a business trip...
The emails he sent Tanja regularly, did they come from his phone?? A laptop?? or the business phone ?? We are not told... Important information again is just left up to our imaginations, as we ourselves fill in the blanks, deciding, just on the evidence at trial, that a story played out in a particular way...
We are well aware that crucial evidence was omitted.... CJ, telling us that Dr Vincent Tabak helped him on the Saturday, move his car from the drive, we know from CJ that the car was parked on the road on the Friday evening.. Proving that Dr Vincent Tabak didn't lie about CJ or try to incriminate him...
The omissions in this case could dramatically change the complexion of this case... The omissions that could prove one way or another Dr Vincent Tabak's movements on Friday 17th December 2010 through to Monday 20th December 2010, covering the critical time span...
As I said there was a whole hour unaccounted for whilst Dr Vincent Tabak was in his flat... a whole hour where the prosecution where just happy to accept that Dr Vincent tabak was actually in his flat.... I always wondered why they accepted this seeing as there was no evidence at trial to cover this hour....
Was he ringing business partners? Was he talking to someone?? was he texting someone, was he just messing on this business phone for an hour??
The business phone has to be important, the business phone could have been used to send the texts to Tanja... The business phone may have had auto correct on it, sending the "Crisis" message....
Unless we can establish which phone/phones were used by Dr Vincent Tabak over that weekend, how can we confidently establish his movements... A business phone that we do not know if Dr Vincent Tabak had from new... A business phone we do not know if anyone else had ever used or had access to... a business phone that could still have evidence upon it...
We have Lyndsey Farmery, the powerpoint pointer, whom explains to the jury with her slide show that Dr Vincent Tabak sent XYZ message at XXY time... that Dr Vincent Tabak did XYZ search at XYZ time... I say she showed us the text messages , but I cannot be 100% sure, she was the computer expert that took the stand in this trial,.. If Lyndsey Farmery didn't analysis Dr Vincent Tabak's mobile phones who did?? The 1300 page document, did it have which phone which action was done from??
Did Lyndsey Farmery also examine the mobile phones of Dr Vincent Tabak??/ Did Lyndsey Farmery omit the fact that the information from devices that Dr Vincent Tabak used was not all presented at trial...
There should have been miles and miles of information.... Highlighted for the jury to show the relevant times... But i am not sure if that was what happened... I am under the impression that what was seem as incriminating was the only evidence that the jury saw....
Within Lyndsey Farmery's testimony, did she inform the jury that one message had come from Dr Vincent Tabak's personal phone and an other message had come from Dr Vincent Tabak's business phone?? Did she keep them illuminated of the full facts... Or did she too omit evidence in this case??
A slight remark made on video, keeps me questioning the case, keeps me asking what was done for Dr Vincent Tabak... keeps me wondering just how much evidence was omitted and how much of this evidence would have changed the events of May/ October 2011
More needs to be know of this business phone of Dr Vincent Tabak's , more needs to be understood, more needs to be examined as to its full contents and usage, by Dr Vincent Tabak or anyone else...
It is always easy to go with the crowd, it is always easy to believe a story, but when huge amounts have been omitted , then the story can and does change dramatically...
I want to go back to one more issue.... It was established at trial that Dr Vincent Tabak did not know Joanna Yeates, which has been questioned before.. If Dr Vincent Tabak doesn't remember the incident with CJ... what else doesn't he remember??
Did any of these phones have Joanna Yeates as a contact?? It may seem an odd question, but it is a possibility.... I believe that Buro Happold were a client of BDP, they worked together , they got together.... The connection between BDP and Buro Happold has been played down.... A connection one couldn't fail to notice, if one was prepared to look...
A connection that would have been apparent to anyone working for these companies... So did Dr Vincent Tabak ever come into contact with Joanna Yeates in a work capacity?? We don't know... Was this why Dr Vincent Tabak made searches?/ was he concerned just like everyone else whom had come into contact with Joanna Yeates, keeping abreast of this case as it unfolded...
It was made out at trial, that Joanna Yeates and Dr Vincent Tabak were complete strangers, this may be true, but what if it wasn't the case? what if in fact they did know each other. Or had come into contact because of work??
This again would change the complexion of the trial... It has always been maintained that it was a spur of the moment thing... That he suddenly without any reason attacked his neighbour...
Had Dr Vincent Tabak actually been around to flat 1 before?/ had Dr Vincent Tabak worked with Joanna Yeates before??
Here are 2 quotes... from different publications:
Telegraph:
He claimed Miss Yeates had invited him into her flat after seeing him walk past her kitchen window as he was heading to the supermarket. He told the court: “I waved to her and she waved back.”
Sally Ramage .. Cleggs opening speech..
Vincent was walking towards his car when he passed Joanna’s kitchen window. She saw
him, there was a nod of acknowledgement and she beckoned him to come in. She had
opened the door and invited him in.
Clegg clearly telling us that there was a nod of acknowledgement... A nod that suggest that they did know each other...
If we go back to who CJ saw at the gate, who were these people?? did these people enter or leave Joanna Yeates flat.. Did Dr Vincent Tabak in fact enter Joanna yeates flat??
To feel responsible, may be interpreted in another way... for example if someone else was in Joanna Yeates flat and had been there with Dr Vincent Tabak and he had left her with them... It's an idea, but I am trying to put forward why Dr Vincent Tabak makes certain statements at trial... yet has such a vague recollection of events....
I have questioned many times why Joanna Yeates would open the door to a complete stranger... it doesn't seem a likely scenario... Had Dr Vincent Tabak popped in to say hello, then gone to ASDA?? we don't know...
Because we do not know for a fact, the exact time and day of Joanna Yeates death, it is difficult to establish when she was killed.... It is easy enough to have a tale around the apparent events, but the omissions make me question all the events of that time..
The screams are at random times, some when she is clearly not at home, and the scream that Kingdon heard mid morning on Saturday the 18th December 2010...
What proves that Joanna Yeates was dead within minutes of arriving home?? Nothing ... Nothing that Dr Delaney told us on the stand quantifies this... We only have the tale from Dr Vincent Tabak on the stand to tell us this... a tale which I do not believe....
In actual fact Dr Delaney gives us evidence to the contrary... Dr Delaney puts Joanna Yeates in different clothes... now we can interpret that in many ways.... She had time when she got home to change her clothes to the Pink Flower patterned Top, which she obviously wasn't wearing at The Ram that evening.... discounting the idea that she was attacked as soon as she arrived home... She was re-dressed by someone or more than one person, which no evidence of that was brought to trial... Or that simply she had slept in the flat on the Friday night and had changed her clothes in the morning....
There is no satisfactory explanation of the change of clothing given at trial.... Not even the jury questioned this...
So at what time and date , was Joanna Yeates alive?? empty stomach contents, will not prove anything... But a change of clothing gives us a clearer idea, that Joanna Yeates was not attacked immediately as has been suggested...
What really took place at 44, Canygne Road, what was it that made Ann Reddrop as early as late December 2010, see Dr Vincent Tabak as a suspect?? Was it really an anonymous phone call pointing the finger in his direction, that made her pursue him as a suspect, a phone call from a person that has not been identified, a phone call that was not played at trial, a phone call that changed many lives...
Was there a rush to judgement, was every avenue checked and checked again... Was a robust investigation done at the time??
I would say not... Based just on what I have found out since Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction.... Based on the video evidence of the people that were closest to the case in one way or another....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8839702/Vincent-Tabak-Joanna-flirted-with-me-and-I-made-a-clumsy-pass-at-her.htmlhttp://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf
