Mrswah its vital he is on the Register as he is attracted to children. The 10 years wouldnt start until his release so it really does matter.
No excuses can be made for pictures , Im sure he didnt admit his guilt yet again, just to get it out of the way! He is guilty!
But the question has to be... How was he put on the website that is The Uk and Ireland data base in August 2012?? When he didn't actually go to court until March 2015??
Vincent Tabak – Bristol
20
Monday
Aug 2012
Posted by Author in Avon and Somerset & Bristol ≈ Comments Off on Vincent Tabak – Bristol
November 2011
Child porn found on Vincent Tabak’s laptop
Murderer Vincent Tabak kept images of children being sexually abused on his laptop computer, police have discovered.
The 33-year-old killer was jailed for life on Friday after a jury found him guilty of throttling 25-year-old Joanna Yeates.
Following his conviction at Bristol Crown Court it was revealed that the Dutch engineer was obsessed with images of women being strangled during sex and had perversions for violent pornography and prostitutes.
It also came to light that Tabak faced further questioning by police relating to material discovered on the hard drives of computers he used.
It has now been reported that Avon and Somerset Police discovered 30 images of youngsters being sexually abused.
An officer involved in the investigation, who asked not to be named, told the Bristol Evening Post that he and his colleagues wanted to clear up speculation surrounding these “other matters”.
He said: “Tabak had 30 images depicting child pornography on his laptop computer at home.
“They were all category four images.”
The officer said that, due to Tabak’s conviction for murder and life sentence, he did not think the Crown Prosecution Service would take action.
There are five levels of seriousness for offences involving indecent photographs of children, which start with images depicting “erotic posing with no sexual activity”.
Category four images depict penetrative sexual activity involving a child or children, or both children and adults.
Detective Chief Inspector Phil Jones, who led the murder investigation, confirmed: “During the examination of Vincent Tabak’s computer, other material was found.
“We have referred this matter to the Crown Prosecution Service for initial guidance.”
Once referred to the CPS they will consider a number of criteria before charging someone with an offence.
This includes whether it is in the public interest to do so.
Jurors in Tabak’s trial were not told that videos found on his computers had chilling parallels with the way Miss Yeates died.
His pornography depicted blonde women being throttled during sex or bundled into car boots.
Two weeks before murdering the landscape architect, he also paid for sex with a prostitute during a business trip to Los Angeles.
But despite being blocked from hearing of his depraved sex secrets, jurors still found him guilty of murdering his next-door neighbour on December 17 last year.
The frozen body of Miss Yeates, who lived with her boyfriend, Greg Reardon, in a flat in Canynge Road, Clifton, Bristol, was found on Christmas morning by a couple walking their dog on a country lane in Failand, North Somerset.
Tabak was jailed for life by Mr Justice Field and told he would serve at least 20 years in prison before he could apply for parole.
Nothing here is said about his court appearance... They have just informed everyone that it is apparently true years before a trial took place.... Now that is weird!
So how did the person who wrote this know for a fact that there were images on Dr Vincent Tabak's computer, when it hadn't been proven at the time of this post on the data base....
I keep saying this case is off.... Well that's off if someone can be named on a data base before they have even been taken to court for such a crime...
What was the court case number of Dr Vincent Tabak, for the crime of child abuse images?? Or was it just something the papers reported on that didn't happen??
Edit... You see it's always odd that Dr Vincent Tabak pleads guilty, when this data base could have been seen as prejudicial if he faced a jury.... Now no-one representing him pointed that gem out, did they!!
Please do not misinterpret my post... I do not support child abuse, I find it abhorrant.. But i find that this particular man appears to plead guilty at the drop of a hat, and if he was on a minimum of 20 years, i am sure he wouldn't want to rock the boat... So pleading guilty could be seen as a way forward...
https://theukdatabase.com/2012/08/20/vincent-tabak-bristol/
