Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views

[justsaying]

The "others" were not on trial for murder, Luke Mitchell was!

His brother Shane was asked during trial to confirm if Luke was home with him. Regardless of whether he was threatened with legal action he could have simply said YES Luke was home with me.

Why didn't he?

Why did he refuse to confirm Luke was home with him, therefore had an alibi?

What part of "he would have been prosecuted" is not sinking in?

[justsaying]

I am sticking to the facts, was he or was he not threatened with legal action for saying his brother was home with him?  FACT!

Why do you not answer my question? Why did others change their statements to fit the prosecution theory?

Why do you not admit you do not have a clue?

[jixy]

The "others" were not on trial for murder, Luke Mitchell was!

His brother Shane was asked during trial to confirm if Luke was home with him. Regardless of whether he was threatened with legal action he could have simply said YES Luke was home with me.

Why didn't he?

Why did he refuse to confirm Luke was home with him, therefore had an alibi?

And why do you feel the need to keep repeating over and over that Luke was on trial like we dont know that.

The statements, the facts not recorded properly (in Luke's case) the pure inconsistencies are all the things that resulted in Luke being convicted! it is important no matter how many times you repeat that he was on trial!

[justsaying]

Seeing as though you seem to know all the facts Stephanie - Can you tell us who made the phone-call from the house when the Mother and Brother were not at a home,  did they have ghosts who liked to make phone-calls perhaps? 

[justsaying]

Why do you not furnish us with this complete information Stephanie?

[justsaying]

Why don't you answer any questions which are posed to you?

Is it because you cannot?

[Nicholas]

Is the reason Shane Mitchell has never spoken out in support of his brother because he fears he may incriminate him further?

[justsaying]

I'm not interested in hearsay.

Is the reason Shane Mitchell has never spoken out in support of his brother because he fears he may incriminate his brother further; like Shaun Hall did in the Simon Hall case?

No, why be interested in "hearsay" when out and out speculation will do! 

[jixy]

No, why be interested in "hearsay" when out and out speculation will do! 

 

[Nicholas]

Why don't you answer any questions which are posed to you?

Is it because you cannot?

Your questions are based on hearsay my questions are based on facts.

Why didn't Shane Mitchell corroborate his brothers alibi during his trial?

Why would he fear being threatened if he was sticking to the truth?

[Nicholas]

No, why be interested in "hearsay" when out and out speculation will do! 

Shane Mitchell's was asked to corroborate his brothers alibi during trial. Nothing speculative in that. He failed to do so. WHY?

[justsaying]

Your questions are based on hearsay my questions are based on facts.

 

Why didn't Shane Mitchell corroborate his brothers alibi during his trial?

Already answered, a few times in fact!

Why would he fear being threatened if he was sticking to the truth?

See above!

Simon Halls mother lied during her sons murder trial.She was also aware of the consequences of her actions if it were found she lied.

How on earth could they possibly prove that they were telling the truth?  And you acknowledge that the thread was indeed there, to both of them 

[jixy]

Shane Mitchell's was asked to corroborate his brothers alibi during trial. Nothing speculative in that. He failed to do so. WHY?

if only that was the only error with this case, wouldnt life be simple?

[justsaying]

As opposed to your opinion or conclusion which appears to have been formed on the basis of incomplete information; why don't you find out WHY Shane Mitchell did not corroborate his brothers alibi during trial?

What does Shane Mitchell say was his reason for not confirming his brothers alibi?

Would you care to furnish us with complete information? Or is this just speculation also?

[jixy]

Give it a rest...

Luke was a child. No one is interested in how many times you can say his name or have a quick mention of Sandra's

Nothing he did will help Luke so NO it isnt relevant.