still no cite.......no surprise
Why is it such a surprise? Do I make a habit of not providing cites when asked? Tut tut.
You have read the files you claim, you should then not require a cite should you? but just so as it doesn't bother you all day, let us recap
I said that Mark Harrison called the alerts without forensic corroboration unconfirmed indications, and that is precisely what he said. So, no, you were very wrong when you accused me of
making it up , such haste and willingness to disbelieve a simple statement
Here is your cite, I await your apology in due course (when pigs grow wings of course)
During the searches two Police dogs were deployed and although it has been stated that no physical remains were located in the area these dogs did give indications in several areas. These areas have been subject to a separate forensic examination that is beyond the scope of this report and at the time of writing laboratory tests are being undertaken. The dogs’ handler has submitted a separate report regarding the performance of the dogs (see appendix 4). However, it must be stated any such indications without any physical evidence to support them can not have any evidential value,
being unconfirmed INDICATIONS Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARK_HARRISON.htmSo there we have it, alerts remain
indications