I will put my replies as Bold:
Well I thought there was some mistakes, and I just didn't have the energy to argue the point.
You said "You’re talking 35 years ago; BT didn’t have the technology they do now — and why would a BT engineer in the dead of night play games with their line?"
OK there is some discussion of how to get a clear line into the house. I'll find it later and we'll discuss it then.
You said "Instead of conjuring up implausible scenarios, Rob, go by the facts that are known — including the lies Bamber told.
He said Nevill rang him and then the phone cut off “like someone had pressed the buttons down”. He was obviously trying to infer that Sheila had walked over to Nevill as he was speaking on the phone and placed her fingers on the cut-off buttons.
We all know that’s pathetic and utter rubbish."
Well that is how you see it.
You said "Whatever, JB said the phone cut off, so he would have got the dialling tone immediately."
He would need to put his phone down first and then pick it up again to get a new dial tone.
He claimed he rang back (not immediately, I seem to recall...), and got the engaged tone. But that engaged tone happened when he himself took the receiver off its cradle.
You said "His lies are all tosh.
Finally, there were NO calls made to the police, 999, or any other number from WHF after Jeremy Bamber took the receiver off. None. Not one.
It’s time wasting discussing it"
That is right if you just want to rave on about your views there is no point discussing it.
You haven’t explained what I write that was incorrect?
BTW, I’m not interested in discussing how engineers get a line into a house; I find it extremely boring, and it has nothing to do with what happened.
You’re wrong about the dialling tone. When the CALLER disconnects on a landline you immediately get the dialling tone.
I’m not commenting on this anymore, I’m becoming bored stiff
