Are you really quoting Paulo Pereira Cristovão expecting anyone to place any reliance on what he says ???
Paulo Pereira Cristovão was no more corrupt than anyone else. who are you comparing him with B
Why ever did the mccs involve metido 3 in the first place another disaster IMO they never attempted to reclaim any money paid to them.
They were dodgy - and dodgy detectives do dodgy things. Were they ever looking for Maddie.
I believe to make sence of them being employed was they had ulterior motives.
It still doesn't alter the fact GA believed there was no abduction - and that is still the case.
An Unjust Removal
On 2nd October, 2007, Amaral, after, criticizing his British counterparts in a phone call to a British journalist, was taken off the case and transferred to the nearby Algarve city of Faro. However, Amaral learnt, soon after, that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown was privy to this information before Amaral himself was notified. Suspicious? Be it as you shall privately determine.
For those that have followed this case as closely as I have, it is easy to determine why Amaral was unceremoniously removed from the investigation. Bearing in mind, that by now the investigators were scrutinising very closely and leaning towards the possible involvement of the McCanns themselves in the disappearance of their daughter. At this stage, the investigators had found ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE of an abduction, but had found huge inconsistencies in the McCann’s (and friend’s) accounts of that night and had procured remarkable evidence retrieved from the highly-trained dog alerts, Eddie and Keela.