Author Topic: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?  (Read 33964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

On 2nd April 2013, Leonor Cipriano was sentenced to seven months in prison for making false statements. Already serving a sentence of 16 years for the murder of her daughter Joana, who vanished in September 2004, Leonor was now found to have wrongly accused officers of the Judicial Police of having assaulted her during questioning.




Leonor Cipriano, who is currently serving 16 years in prison for murder and concealment of a corpse, gave contradictory statements about alleged abuse she had suffered at the premises of the Judicial Police (PJ) in Faro during questioning that was conducted whilst investigating the disappearance of her daughter, on September 12, from the village of Figueira, Portimão.

In the ruling the collective of judges considered that the statements that Leonor Cipriano produced during the trial sessions contained "flagrant and relevant contradictions", despite having had the "opportunity to reveal the truth". The court has, however, considered the aggressions as proved, although without establishing the aggressors' identity.

In the same case, Gonçalo Amaral, a former coordinator of the PJ's Criminal Investigation Department in Portimão, who was acquitted of the crime of omission of denunciation, was condemned to one and a half years over the crime of false deposition, with a suspended sentence over a similar period. Inspector António Nunes Cardoso was condemned to two years and three months over forgery of a document, with a suspended sentence over two years.

In turn, the former PJ inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristóvão and Leonel Morgado Marques and Paulo Marques Bom, who all stood accused of the crimes of torture against Leonor Cipriano following the questioning, were acquitted.





« Last Edit: August 11, 2013, 03:11:42 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Luz

Amaral ...haven't all those proved to be liars in court

WRONG AGAIN.

Once and for all:

1. His book was released by the Supreme Court in Lisbon and the McCann ordered to restore all the books their stupid lawyer had in her custody - they failed for almost 9 months (this is criminal, they were lucky none of the defendants took measures against them);

2. Leonor Cipriano was condemned this past February to 7 months in jail, for having lied about being tortured by the PJ. Every inspector, including Amaral, were immediately exonerated/the sentences were annulled. If there was no crime they could not have been accused.

Offline Mr Gray

WRONG AGAIN.

Once and for all:

1. His book was released by the Supreme Court in Lisbon and the McCann ordered to restore all the books their stupid lawyer had in her custody - they failed for almost 9 months (this is criminal, they were lucky none of the defendants took measures against them);

2. Leonor Cipriano was condemned this past February to 7 months in jail, for having lied about being tortured by the PJ. Every inspector, including Amaral, were immediately exonerated/the sentences were annulled. If there was no crime they could not have been accused.

IM referring to 2 and I believe you are wrong. Where is the ruling that annuls the charge against amaral

Offline Mr Gray

IM referring to 2 and I believe you are wrong. Where is the ruling that annuls the charge against amaral

Was the clearing of amaral reported in any newspaper... I think the answers no ...again

Offline Luz

IM referring to 2 and I believe you are wrong. Where is the ruling that annuls the charge against amaral

Use google translation


Leonor Cipriano condemned for false declarations (literally)

Leonor Cipriano was sentenced on Tuesday to seven months in prison for false statements, says TVI 24. Already serving a sentence of 16 years for the murder of her daughter Joana, who vanished in September 2004, Leonor was now found to have wrongly accused officers of the Judicial Police of having assaulted her during questioning.

Leonor Cipriano, who is currently serving 16 years in prison for murder and concealment of a corpse, gave contradictory statements about alleged abuse she had suffered at the premises of the Judicial Police (PJ) in Faro during questioning that was conducted whilst investigating the disappearance of her daughter, on September 12, from the village of Figueira, Portimão.

In the ruling the collective of judges considered that the statements that Leonor Cipriano produced during the trial sessions contained "flagrant and relevant contradictions", despite having had the "opportunity to reveal the truth". The court has, however, considered the aggressions as proved, although without establishing the aggressors' identity.

In the same case, Gonçalo Amaral, a former coordinator of the PJ's Criminal Investigation Department in Portimão, who was acquitted of the crime of omission of denunciation, was condemned to one and a half years over the crime of false deposition, with a suspended sentence over a similar period. Inspector António Nunes Cardoso was condemned to two years and three months over forgery of a document, with a suspended sentence over two years.

In turn, the former PJ inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristóvão and Leonel Morgado Marques and Paulo Marques Bom, who all stood accused of the crimes of torture against Leonor Cipriano following the questioning, were acquitted.

http://www.publico.pt/sociedade/noticia/leonor-cipriano-condenada-a-sete-meses-de-prisao-por-falsas-declaracoes-1589891
« Last Edit: August 11, 2013, 02:51:04 AM by John »

Offline Mr Gray

Use google translation


Leonor Cipriano condemned for false declarations (literally)

http://www.publico.pt/sociedade/noticia/leonor-cipriano-condenada-a-sete-meses-de-prisao-por-falsas-declaracoes-1589891

I am well aware of this ....nowhere does it say that amaral was cleared
I also believe the torture was confirmed by the court
I think you are mistaken...again
As I have said, has any newspaper reported amaral has been cleared... the answer is no again

Offline Mr Gray

The contradictory statements about the aggressions of which she was a target were made between 2008 and 2009, at the time of the trial1 of the inspectors who investigated the "Joana Case", which resulted in the condemnation of two of the five defendants in that process.

That court considered the aggressions proven even though the identity of the attackers was never established.

Gonçalo Amaral, a former coordinator of the PJ's Criminal Investigation Department in Portimão, who was acquitted of the crime of omission of denunciation, was condemned to one and a half years over the crime of false deposition, with a suspended sentence over a similar period.

The inspector António Nunes Cardoso was condemned to two years and three months for the falsification of a document, with a suspended sentence of two years.

The former Judiciary Police inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristóvão, Leonel Morgado Marques and Paulo Marques Bom, who were accused of having tortured Leonor Cipriano during the questionings2 at the headquarters of the PJ of Faro, were all absolved.

this is from the mccannfiles website after the cipriano trial

it confirms that

1 the torture took place

2 Amaral was not cleared

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
WRONG AGAIN.

Once and for all:

1. His book was released by the Supreme Court in Lisbon and the McCann ordered to restore all the books their stupid lawyer had in her custody - they failed for almost 9 months (this is criminal, they were lucky none of the defendants took measures against them);

2. Leonor Cipriano was condemned this past February to 7 months in jail, for having lied about being tortured by the PJ. Every inspector, including Amaral, were immediately exonerated/the sentences were annulled. If there was no crime they could not have been accused.

So you are claiming that Amaral is not a convicted perjurer then???

Cite, please.

Offline Luz

you failed  to back up any claims you have made so I suppose it is natural that you have now given up the debate and resorted to name calling. Isnt that against forum rules

Amaral wasn't cleraed

I am not calling names. Are you joking?

Amaral wasn't cleared from what? From a crime that wasn't committed?
As soon as the Court found the accused guilty, a "certidão" (official document) was sent to the other Court so that the previous sentences against the Inspectors could be annulled.

Offline Mr Gray

I am not calling names. Are you joking?

Amaral wasn't cleared from what? From a crime that wasn't committed?
As soon as the Court found the accused guilty, a "certidão" (official document) was sent to the other Court so that the previous sentences against the Inspectors could be annulled.

You really do not know what is going on in your own country. You say Amaral was cleared. Wheres your proof.

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2013, 08:40:38 PM »
You really do not know what is going on in your own country. You say Amaral was cleared. Wheres your proof.

I'd be very interested to see this annulment certificate that Luz claims exists, too, davel.

Although I have a feeling that we may we waiting a long time.....

Offline Carana

Re: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2013, 08:41:02 PM »
I am not calling names. Are you joking?

Amaral wasn't cleared from what? From a crime that wasn't committed?
As soon as the Court found the accused guilty, a "certidão" (official document) was sent to the other Court so that the previous sentences against the Inspectors could be annulled.

Could you provide a link?

Offline Luz

Re: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2013, 08:42:25 PM »
You really do not know what is going on in your own country. You say Amaral was cleared. Wheres your proof.


I know very well what is going on in my country. I was on the several court sessions that ended up with Leonor's condemnation and I read the documents that were made public at the Court of Faro.
 This is not the UK, this is a democratic country.

Offline Luz

Re: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2013, 08:43:39 PM »
Could you provide a link?


I can't offer links to documents that are in paper format.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Gonçalo Amaral been vindicated by the recent Cipriano denunciation?
« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2013, 08:44:33 PM »

I know very well what is going on in my country. I was on the several court sessions that ended up with Leonor's condemnation and I read the documents that were made public at the Court of Faro.
 This is not the UK, this is a democratic country.

Proof of Amaral being l cleared,... he wasn't