Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 266926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Aegean

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #150 on: October 27, 2013, 01:30:24 PM »
the article is an attempt to cash in..pure and simple..to read the full article it seems you have to take out a subscription costing £20.

The Times and Sunday Times have a paywall and have done for about three years now. You therefore have to have a subscription to read all their articles, so it's hardly as though this particular one was published just so they can cash in. As others have mentioned, you can always by the print version, which is what people used to do daily not so long ago. Or you can even take a 1 month subscription for £8.

Newspapers having a subscription is hardly about "cashing in", the point is to make money to cover their costs. No one ever complained about having to pay for printed editions.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #151 on: October 27, 2013, 01:31:17 PM »
The Times and Sunday Times have a paywall and have done for about three years now. You therefore have to have a subscription to read all their articles, so it's hardly as though this particular one was published just so they can cash in. As others have mentioned, you can always by the print version, which is what people used to do daily not so long ago. Or you can even take a 1 month subscription for £8.

Newspapers having a subscription is hardly about "cashing in", the point is to make money to cover their costs. No one ever complained about having to pay for printed editions.

here in australia  most of  our  online papers you have to pay no big deal

Offline Montclair

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #152 on: October 27, 2013, 01:32:55 PM »
This story in now in the German Bild Zeitung.

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #153 on: October 27, 2013, 01:33:43 PM »
I can't believe it's true. No loving parents of a missing child would send the world on a wild goose chase for 5 years, surely?

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #154 on: October 27, 2013, 01:34:25 PM »
I can't believe it's true. No loving parents of a missing child would send the world on a wild goose chase for 5 years, surely?

not even if money was involved??

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #155 on: October 27, 2013, 01:36:51 PM »
This story in now in the German Bild Zeitung.

Lets see if any uk papers run it...could be a bonanza payday for the MCCanns if they do

Offline xtina

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #156 on: October 27, 2013, 01:38:54 PM »
duped ... wonder how many fell for this  @)(++(*


duped...............everyone i know bought the  paper  @)(++(*
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #157 on: October 27, 2013, 01:39:29 PM »
This story in now in the German Bild Zeitung.

Why were indications held back for years?
http://www.bild.de/news/ausland/maddie-mccann/fall-maddie-mccann-hinweise-jahrelang-vertuscht-33145312.bild.html

Oh dear. That's not helpful.


Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #158 on: October 27, 2013, 01:39:38 PM »
Lets see if any uk papers run it...could be a bonanza payday for the MCCanns if they do

Do you think the McCanns would attempt to sue the papers?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #159 on: October 27, 2013, 01:41:30 PM »
Do you think the McCanns would attempt to sue the papers?

If someone printed blatant lies about you..what would you do

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #160 on: October 27, 2013, 01:42:41 PM »

laughable .............do you think the so called  parent care  what i think .................i would have thought they have a lot more  to worry about than that  .....

ellipsis........as  two l... 8((()*/

I really can't understand what you are saying here.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #161 on: October 27, 2013, 01:44:52 PM »
This would be an absolutely massive story IF TRUE..as yet no other papers running it

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #162 on: October 27, 2013, 01:47:09 PM »
This would be an absolutely massive story IF TRUE..as yet no other papers running it

It's true the efits were not used for five years. That's the big issue here. Why weren't they used? There was no efit for JT's man. Why not use the one you did have?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #163 on: October 27, 2013, 01:47:17 PM »
If someone printed blatant lies about you..what would you do

What  'lies'  are there in this article  ...   what is written there that you  know to be untrue  ?

The Times have SEEN  the report written by Oakley

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #164 on: October 27, 2013, 01:47:30 PM »
This would be an absolutely massive story IF TRUE..as yet no other papers running it

Lets wait and see!

I'm particularly interested to see if the telly picks up on it too!