Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.

[Benice]

So should £5,000,000 , and of course this is increasing day by day, be spent on ALL MISSING PEOPLE ?

The whole subject of Missing people should be elevated to be given more importance by the Authorities than it has been in the past. IMO.     Sadly, to some degree the McCann case has highlighted that need.

Tell me Stephen did you begrudge the £3million of taxpayers money it cost searching for April Jones, and did you publically complain about it?    If you didn't then surely that makes you quite a hypocrite. 

[stephen25000]

Can you prove they didn't ?

I don't need to.

[stephen25000]

The whole subject of Missing people should be elevated to be given more importance by the Authorities than it has been in the past. IMO.     Sadly, to some degree the McCann case has highlighted that need.

Tell me Stephen did you begrudge the £3million of taxpayers money it cost searching for April Jones, and did you publically complain about it?    If you didn't then surely that makes you quite a hypocrite.

You really don't get it do you ?

I object to all the attention given to the Mccanns.

Meanwhile the April Jones case was involving murder.

Do you believe this is a murder case ?

[stephen25000]

The whole subject of Missing people should be elevated to be given more importance by the Authorities than it has been in the past. IMO.     Sadly, to some degree the McCann case has highlighted that need.

Tell me Stephen did you begrudge the £3million of taxpayers money it cost searching for April Jones, and did you publically complain about it?    If you didn't then surely that makes you quite a hypocrite.

April of course was abducted by a paedophile.

[imustpointout]

You really don't get it do you ?

I object to all the attention given to the Mccanns.

Meanwhile the April Jones case was involving murder.

Do you believe this is a murder case ?

It may well turn out to be a murder case.

Do you now approve the money?

[lizzibif.]

Prove they didn't.

So you cant oblige thought not.

[Cariad]

Prove the mcCann's suppressed evidence.

The e-fits were made in 2008. They were released in 2013.

We have seen many other e-fits, including eggman released by the Mccanns in the mean time. The 'fund' claimed that the reason they weren't shown is because it would be too expensive to investigate both Innocentman and Smithman. An article in the Sunday Times states that a letter was sent to the authors of the report demanding confidentiality. There has been no statement refuting this from the Mccann camp.

Scotland Yard needed permission from the fund to get access to the report and e-fits.

I'll reiterate though, the strongest evidence of suppression is that the e-fits were not seen until 2013 whereas they'd been commissioned in 2008.

 

[Wonderfulspam]

So you cant oblige thought not.

And you can?

[Benice]

You really don't get it do you ?

I object to all the attention given to the Mccanns.

So why are you giving them so much?  That makes no sense.

[stephen25000]

It may well turn out to be a murder case.

Do you now approve the money?

How long is a piece of string ?
 
i.e. how long will money be spent on this case, as there to be no end-point in sign ?

[imustpointout]

How long is a piece of string ?
 
i.e. how long will money be spent on this case, as there to be no end-point in sign ?

you didn't answer the question, but I will answer yours.

When the appropriate authorities decide - just as they did in the April Jones case.

[stephen25000]

So why are you giving them so much?  That makes no sense.

Why are you ?

I object on a simple basis.

ALL missing people should be treated equally and clearly they are not.

[imustpointout]

Why are you ?

I object on a simple basis.

ALL missing people should be treated equally and clearly they are not.

But THAT is not the Mccanns fault - it is the fault of the system/authorities.

[stephen25000]

But THAT is not the Mccanns fault - it is the fault of the system/authorities.

The mccanns almost from day 1, have gone out to get publicity, set up a fund, use their contacts, have political backing, etc,.

How many other people have had this luxury ?

Or like other mccann supporters, do you think this is a special case, regardless of cost ?

[imustpointout]

The mccanns almost from day 1, have gone out to get publicity, set up a fund, use their contacts, have political backing, etc,.

How many other people have had this luxury ?

Or like other mccann supporters, do you think this is a special case, regardless of cost ?

I don't call it a luxury - it was a necessity, probably because the incident happened abroad.

I cannot comment as to what efforts others take for the "luxury"

I do not think it is a special case, but it is an unsolved case.