Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 266819 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #720 on: October 31, 2013, 04:19:01 PM »
Where is there any indication of any type whatsoever from any source or evidence over the years they were sent is the more pertinent question.....or indeed mentioned by the mccanns and or their PIs up until 2013 not a pip squeak at all anywhere...balance of probabilities is the time story is correct, you faff around it though till kingdom come......

ah the old tried and tested turn it round and ask the question back answer.

Thankyou for your reply.

Offline John

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #721 on: October 31, 2013, 04:36:01 PM »
let's take the 'nobody was searching' statement in the book.

The book was supposed to be a factual account of what happened.

Facts need to be checked.

It was widely reported in the aftermath of Madeleine's disappearance that local people and holidaymakers searched overnight and on subsequent days, both on news reports and in the media in general.

As far as I know the lie that only the Mccanns were searching has not been removed from the book, which was clearly a ploy to gain sympathy for the parents.

As to Amaral, he got the D.N.A. evidence wrong, no doubt about it, as it was inconclusive.

As to lying, have you ever met a person who has never lied in their lives ?

One of your better posts Stephen.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #722 on: October 31, 2013, 04:39:16 PM »
ah the old tried and tested turn it round and ask the question back answer.

Thankyou for your reply.

Nope just simple deductive logic.....look forward to your reply.......

Offline John

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #723 on: October 31, 2013, 04:40:05 PM »
Careful John - Clarence has achieved believed status today.

Ah...is that where he refused to speculate on the speculation?  8-)(--)
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #724 on: October 31, 2013, 04:52:00 PM »
How many photos or drawings did the PJ - the lead investigating Police ever hold up?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #725 on: October 31, 2013, 04:56:10 PM »
He no longer lies with as many teeth in his mouth.

Clarence is now verified by Red

being facetious or putting words into others mouths doesnt help much......i offered NO opinion

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #726 on: October 31, 2013, 04:58:49 PM »
being facetious or putting words into others mouths doesnt help much......i offered NO opinion

you used what he said as confirmation/evidence.

No need to reply.

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #727 on: October 31, 2013, 05:06:00 PM »
'Missing' I see so not abducted then.

Missing through abduction. How does the one cancel the other out?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #728 on: October 31, 2013, 05:10:28 PM »
Of course if the Portuguese Police had not closed the investigation into a missing child after about a year, the hated Clarence would not have had to do this.

Laugh away

Of course if the McCanns & their friends had cooperated with the Portuguese Police the investigation would have remained open.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #729 on: October 31, 2013, 05:11:31 PM »
Of course if the Portuguese Police had not closed the investigation into a missing child after about a year, the hated Clarence would not have had to do this.

Laugh away

Sounds almost like a good theory, if it were not for the fact he also did it before the investigation was shelved.

January 2008. 'Cooperman'.

(No sign of him in the book or on the website either).

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #730 on: October 31, 2013, 05:12:34 PM »
How to avoid conviction in Portugal

Fly home with the approval of the PJ

Case closed.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #731 on: October 31, 2013, 05:13:39 PM »
Sounds almost like a good theory, if it were not for the fact he also did it before the investigation was shelved.

January 2008. 'Cooperman'.

(No sign of him in the book or on the website either).

reads Reds post

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #732 on: October 31, 2013, 05:15:29 PM »
How to avoid conviction in Portugal

Fly home with the approval of the PJ

Case closed.

And when they request you to come back & take part in a reconstitution, don't bother.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #733 on: October 31, 2013, 05:24:53 PM »
And when they request you to come back & take part in a reconstitution, don't bother.

The McCanns were willing to return. See the communications in the files.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #734 on: October 31, 2013, 05:25:17 PM »
maybe  Apostate should explain why the photo was brought to this form?