So WHAT !?
That was yonks after the event and you KNOW IT !
Obfuscation again.
You can't prove that door moved at all when witnesses except for the McCanns only saw it half-open - Matt & Emma. And Gerry saw it half-open when he checked so he claims it moved. Shame he forgot to mention that important revelation in his first statement on 4 May and thought Matt saw it the normal ajar position. Matt contradicted you Gerry. Amazing what you find when you study evidence Sadie.
At about 21.05 the witness came to the Club, entered the room using his respective key, the door being locked, went to his children's bedroom and checked that the twins were fine, as was Madeleine. "He then went to the WC" where he remained for a few moments, left, and bumped into a person he had played tennis with and who had a child's push chair, he was also British, he had a short conversation with him, "returning after that to the restaurant." At about
21.30 his friend Matt (member of the group) went to the apartment, where his children were and on his way went to the witness' apartment, entering by means of a glass sliding door that was always unlocked and was located laterally to the building. He entered the bedroom, he observed the twins and he did not even notice whether Madeleine was there"
[Notes on the three crucial words in this last sentence: "nem sequer reparou"
- "nem sequer" means "not even";
- Verb "reparar" (in this context): to notice, to observe, to see, to take notice of, to pay attention to, to mind, to look out]
as everything was calm, the shutters were closed and
the door to the bedroom was ajar as usual. "After that Matt returned to the restaurant."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm