The Portuguese coordinator in the case was closer to the truth than even he could have dared to imagine in his wildest dreams. He allowed himself to be distracted when he couldn't fit the pieces into the puzzle. The problem he was faced with was that he had too many pieces and so when pressured tried to fit the wrong pieces resulting in ridicule and ultimately dismissal.
Most people who have studied the files have a reasonable grasp of the facts but for one reason or another always fail to join up the dots.
This is simply a pile of waffle.
The job of a detective (especially that of a senior detective co-ordinating a tricky case) is always to make sense of the overload of too many pieces of information. That this man failed in that task is quite evident. But it wasn't because of that why he was dismissed.
His dismissal was entirely due to the fact that he was caught mouthing off to a reporter about things he should not have been saying.
Amaral was not just incompetent in his management of the case but he was responsible for his own dismissal (he clearly tells us all about the events in his book) as well.
The fact that you have said nothing about this 'truth' you claim he was close to suggests you are playing a game trying to pretend you know things. Well, I'm not fooled.
Either spit it out or forever hold your peace. Your making of juvenile quips about inside knowledge or superior intelligence is of no real value to any forum thread.