Author Topic: Expanation and evaluation of Fowler's claims  (Read 8925 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

Re: Expanation and evaluation of Fowler's claims
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2015, 04:10:39 AM »
Posters take heed that abuse will not be tolerated.

Admin

Offline scipio_usmc

Re: Expanation and evaluation of Fowler's claims
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2015, 05:21:15 AM »
Posters take heed that abuse will not be tolerated.

Admin


Ok I will rephrase.  It is extremely foolish to accept claims alleging prosecution experts were wrong as true simply on the basis of deciding one feels the defense experts are more trustworthy because of their credentials even though the defense experts didn't examine any of the physical evidence themselves and worse one doesn't even comprehend the rationale of the defense experts but simply decides to accept their conclusion as true anyway and thus courts refuse to do such and instead look at the rationale of the experts, what evidence they can bring to bear and whether they examined evidence thus are in a position to render a competent opinion. 
“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli