The connection between AB's partner's brother and the Jones' was a significant one. I'm not going to go into detail because that's probably not allowed in here, but AB did not qualify as an independent witness. I don't know why you are so angry all the time and talking about "victories". If you would read what I say more carefully you might start to work things out. Granted it's difficult when people have to talk in riddles because of nonsensical rules in here about naming certain people. I think you'll find the only person I said lied is Dobbie, because that is fact. He stated in Court warrants were only obtained for searches in Mitchell's house and his father's which was false. Hence, he did lie.
I explained anomalies in the evidence of certain people, such as those who were at the murder scene at the exact time of the murder but "couldn't remember what they were doing". Does that sound like the truth or a lie?
It was a mere coincidence that AB's brother-in-law (MBB) knew the Joneses & Walkers. AB didn't know them at all before 30.06.03 and her husband's relationship with them was tenuous at best; it was only her brother-in-law that knew them reasonably well. AB went to the police on the afternoon of 01.07.03 innocently and with the best of intentions. Her brother-in-law, who knew the Jones & Walker families fairly well, found out via his own brother because AB told him about it on the morning of 01.07.03 once the first newsflashes came through, and naturally he told MBB as he knew that MBB knew the two families quite well. AB was simply trying to assist the police and was simply being honest. Also, conspiracy theorists put a lot of stock in the fact that MBB was in a photograph some 6 weeks after the murder and the fact that AB cut Judith's hair a couple of times after the murder; I reiterate, it was pure coincidence and nothing sinister. Read IB and do some research and it will become glaringly obvious that none of the Brysons were involved in the murder of Jodi.
The moped boyd, too. A mere coincidence they were in the vicinity; they were looked into thoroughly & eliminated forensically and by their alibis. JOF cut his hair because it was getting long and he didn't like it (ie, thick, bushy red hair). So, he cut some of it himself initially and then went to a barber's in the subsequent days to get it tidied up. He didn't go to police as quickly as he could have because he was initially paranoid & worried that he might be blamed for it along with GD, especially as they were both near the locus when the murder happened; both were known to police and had a history of violence, so were worried the police might try and blame them. Also, AW advised them not to go to police straight away (in case, I suspect, the police tried to implicate them).
My apologies. AB did not cut Judith's hair in 2003 after the murder, as I said in my post above. She never ever cut Judith's hair. Not once. Not ever. It was MBB's girlfriend who cut her (Judith's) hair (see pages 118-119 of IB). What is accurate in my post above, is that AB's husband's relationship with the Jones & Walker families was tenuous at best. He, like his wife AB, didn't know them at all and only had heard of them/came into contact with them through MBB -- AB's brother-in-law. MBB's relationship to the Jones & Walker families was through Jodi's cousin, JW (presumably JOF) as per the AB chapter in SL's 'Innocents Betrayed'.