Indeed and he did admit to manslaughter. If that was not the case he could have changed his plea at any time.
Hi john
I don't understand why they didn't give him bail??? What evidence had they held him on?
CJ was released...... and he was still on bail until March, I think it was..
So you have 2 men on bail for the same murder and one of them is on remand..
They could have taken his passport off him if they thought he was a flight risk.
I do not understand why they had Dr Vincent Tabak on Remand??
Why did he not appear in court on think it was Tuesday 1st Feb2010 for his Bail hearing???
His lawyer leaves him...
There are plenty of odd things happening,
I do not know why he changed his plea to guilty...... But he was at loss of liberty for a long time, do not know what kind of pressure he was under or his mental state...
Interogation and have adverse effects on people...
Nobody knows why he pleaded the way he did....
But I believe the man should have been given bail...And been given a chance to get his defence together in a proper manner....
Why was CJ released.... Dr Vincent Tabak was not??
Dr Vincent Tabak had no previous.... they still need to gather evidence....
I wish I had seen the evidence they had at his first hearing that they used to charge him with...
As we know the crying girl story appears to be just that... A story.....
The DNA could only rule him in... but they need more to prove it came from Dr Vincent Tabak as it was partial...
The time available for him to do the crime , is not there (IMO)....
And they were originally looking for someone for the murder for the Saturday, because of the CCTV of a car going over a bridge...
The defence didn't get the tim line folder until day of trail... If they had gotten that soner, his lawyer would havee been able to see he didn't have the time..
How can you cross reference all those timelines and check that the evidence in a 1300 page document is correct..
His Lawyer may have believed he was innocent, but he too needed the time and effort to prove he was....
If the evidence against Dr Vincent Tabak was accurate, WHY with hold the 1300 page time line..
Half of the trial the actual times do not get mentioned.... Why?
Maybe he couldn't as the timeline folder wasn't available and his defence didn't have the proper information before them to prove other wise..
And I still stand by if they say it was him, he had NO reason to move the body from one place to 3 others.... very
risky!!
We don't know why he hasn't asked for repatriation, which I find extremely weird... What is stopping him doing at least that,..
John, do you not find it strange the range of date that he was charged between?
16th to the 26th Dec??
The charge, when it came, was all the more jarring, therefore – that between Dec 16 and Dec 26 he had murdered Joanna Yeates.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8280005/Joanna-Yeates-murder-suspect-Vincent-Tabak-enjoyed-normal-family-Christmas.htmlShe was alive on the 16th and not on the 26th...
Also John is there anything in this case that strikes a chord regards Dr Vincent Tabak..,
Imo.. the scene was staged...
The important clues they had: The Pizza ( given as a treat or reward)
The ski sock, ( there is a jump in skiing called the Pizza) oddly enough..
The Shard of console..... which was never explained
Plus the piece of evidence that was handed in that was significant.....
I've discovered Pizza is used in grooming young people....
Also that child porn images can be pseudo... Which I'll come back to...
There was no evidence that Dr Vincent Tabak groomed young people...
Maybe the Pizza WAS more of a clue than they first thought!!