« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 96   Go Down

Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #330 on: October 27, 2013, 08:10:00 PM »
Quote from: davel on October 27, 2013, 08:07:29 PM
Who established the pj never had then

I'll retract that part of the statement as I can't be bothered going through old threads to find the relevant posts.#

I'll leave "why weren't they in the PJ files though?"
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #331 on: October 27, 2013, 08:11:10 PM »
Quote from: davel on October 27, 2013, 08:02:02 PM
there you are ... so is this person telling lies

I think this person is definitely being dishonest as the official files and the Sunday a Times article proves.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #332 on: October 27, 2013, 08:11:52 PM »
Quote from: Cariad on October 27, 2013, 08:06:52 PM
Why is imustpointout allowed to disrupt every thread with petty, pointless and provocative comments?

Please tell me how many threads I am currently disrupting.
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #333 on: October 27, 2013, 08:13:06 PM »
Quote
the Sunday a Times article proves

oh really - some people have lost all sense of reality.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #334 on: October 27, 2013, 08:13:22 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 27, 2013, 08:02:20 PM
why is red allowed to post stupid graphics?

is it a cartoon forum now?

stupid? Thats quite subjective....a graphic from me is no different from a post from you..it conveys a message, stop whinging wont you lol
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #335 on: October 27, 2013, 08:17:24 PM »
Quote from: Cariad on October 27, 2013, 08:10:00 PM
I'll retract that part of the statement as I can't be bothered going through old threads to find the relevant posts.#

I'll leave "why weren't they in the PJ files though?"
when were the files released
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #336 on: October 27, 2013, 08:17:58 PM »
Quote from: davel on October 27, 2013, 08:07:29 PM
Who established the pj never had then

Dont YOU have to establish that the PJ WERE given them? To bolster your argument? Do you have any evidence they were? NO you dont, because they never were, and were never given to anyone at all,they were suppressed, simple as that! As confirmed in the times report today, the PIS were gagged from revealing their report which contained the efits.....to anyone under threat of legal action! Smell the COFFEE dear.......the  Mccanns suppressed these efits in 2008 and fast forward to 2013 after a 6m quid review by SY and whatever they had to do to get hold of them, the  efits are so important, couldnt make it up could you


Edited


I prefer to believe  C4 news and their correspondents to get to the truth rather than some paid professional liar


!
 8((()*/



« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 08:25:38 PM by Redblossom »
Logged

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #337 on: October 27, 2013, 08:23:52 PM »
Logged

Offline BigFatBlonde

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #338 on: October 27, 2013, 08:32:15 PM »
Oh dear the Telegraph and the Sunday Times.

Lets hope the journalistic might of the highly esteemed Daily Star can help them out of this crises.

N
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #339 on: October 27, 2013, 08:32:29 PM »
Quote from: Cariad on October 27, 2013, 08:23:52 PM
davel, what about now?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10407664/Madeleine-McCann-critical-new-evidence-is-from-five-year-old-suppressed-report.html

if you read the telegraph article it is exactly as I expected.. the telegraph makes no claims...it simply says ....evidence supressed by parents claims sunday times...which is true... Im sure the mcCanns cannot ignore this now.I hope more papers pick up on it
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #340 on: October 27, 2013, 08:34:38 PM »
Quote from: Cariad on October 27, 2013, 08:23:52 PM
davel, what about now?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10407664/Madeleine-McCann-critical-new-evidence-is-from-five-year-old-suppressed-report.html


This cant be hushed so expect MSM to trickle through with this disgraceful at best episode....

Worms turned somewhere I think now, its utterly fraudulent and disgraceful whats come to light today..shocking, will leave  the apologists to chew the carpets or whitewash it all away, good luck though LOL
 @)(++(*

>>>



« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 08:36:50 PM by Redblossom »
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #341 on: October 27, 2013, 08:38:14 PM »
Quote from: Redblossom on October 27, 2013, 08:34:38 PM

This cant be hushed so expect MSM to trickle through with this disgraceful at best episode....

Worms turned somewhere I think now, its utterly fraudulent and disgraceful whats come to light today..shocking, will leave  the apologists to chew the carpets or whitewash it all away, good luck though LOL
 @)(++(*

>>>

Indeed, the attempts at whitewash are very transparent.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #342 on: October 27, 2013, 08:43:37 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 27, 2013, 08:02:20 PM
why is red allowed to post stupid graphics?

is it a cartoon forum now?

Seeing as you managed to get the mods to delete my gif which was very funny and descriptive, until you had kittens over it,  let me say what was in it in words in the caption


I am the elephant in the room but no one can see me
 8((()*/

the elephant you  and others are trying to move in this case and failing miserably, have fun


Oh dear poor benita accusing c4 investigators now of having agendas  LOL hey ho , zzzzz
 8)-)))



batten down gales are coming tonight

Nite dear
 8((()*/

« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 08:57:09 PM by Redblossom »
Logged

Offline BigFatBlonde

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #343 on: October 27, 2013, 08:53:26 PM »
It all appears to have gone rather quiet - maybe davel and the gang are busy watching X factor?

N
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #344 on: October 27, 2013, 08:56:11 PM »
Quote from: BigFatBlonde on October 27, 2013, 08:53:26 PM
It all appears to have gone rather quiet - maybe davel and the gang are busy watching X factor?

N

No Im a Jake Bugg fan so don't think much of x factor
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 96   Go Up
« previous next »