Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267440 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #495 on: October 29, 2013, 10:56:48 AM »
I've always seen Mr Anjos mind as a 'defender of my country at all costs' ..he is looking at things from his own corner, his state of mind is not wide.. therefore he cannot be realistic.
Do you really hope to convince posters that you don't look at things from your own corner with a wide mind and are therefore realistic ?

Offline VIXTE

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #496 on: October 29, 2013, 01:28:10 PM »
Do you really hope to convince posters that you don't look at things from your own corner with a wide mind and are therefore realistic ?

I have no MISSION in here, I am not trying to convince anyone anything :)

Do you see this forum as a convincing MISSION?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #497 on: October 29, 2013, 02:36:51 PM »
I have no MISSION in here, I am not trying to convince anyone anything :)

Do you see this forum as a convincing MISSION?
Certainly not. I just wondered why you proffered such claims about somebody you don't know.

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #498 on: October 29, 2013, 02:39:16 PM »
Certainly not. I just wondered why you proffered such claims about somebody you don't know.

You mean like you do with the McCann's?
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #499 on: October 29, 2013, 04:08:23 PM »
Do you really hope to convince posters that you don't look at things from your own corner with a wide mind and are therefore realistic ?

Why would you assume that that is what this poster is doing? They are posting opinions on a forum. What are you doing?

Offline John

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #500 on: October 29, 2013, 04:21:30 PM »
Members are asked not to post old newspaper articles in respect of live events.  Thank you.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #501 on: October 29, 2013, 04:54:05 PM »
You mean like you do with the McCann's?
What are you pretending, DCI ? When did I say that the McCanns look at things from their own corner, that their state of mind is not wide and therefore they cannot be realistic ?

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #502 on: October 29, 2013, 05:29:59 PM »
It was Scotland Yard's decision, alone,  to  'open this can of worms'  ...  or do you  think they asked the McCanns permission before releasing the E fits to the public  ?

Kate and Gerry kept quiet about those E fits for years  (  and used their lawyers to make sure others kept quiet about them too )

It makes me  think Scotland Yard and the McCanns are not  quite as hand in glove as might appear

Yes agreed, but I don't think the McCanns and SY would be 'hand in glove' (nice expression) anyway. SY are public servants, not those of the McCanns.

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #503 on: October 29, 2013, 05:56:21 PM »
You'll have to ask whoever started the thread. I'm satisfied that the McCanns did suppress the Oakley report.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #504 on: October 29, 2013, 06:00:52 PM »
You'll have to ask whoever started the thread. I'm satisfied that the McCanns did suppress the Oakley report.

that much is 100 per cent obvious....and it should go without saying the efits as well......for whatever reason!!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #505 on: October 29, 2013, 06:32:23 PM »
You'll have to ask whoever started the thread. I'm satisfied that the McCanns did suppress the Oakley report.

theres people believe all sorts of things

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #506 on: October 29, 2013, 06:35:18 PM »
theres people believe all sorts of things

I believe the children are our future, teach them well & let them lead the way
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #507 on: October 29, 2013, 06:41:34 PM »
I believe the children are our future, teach them well & let them lead the way

hi ho silver lining

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #508 on: October 29, 2013, 06:44:33 PM »
hi ho silver lining

No, damn I sung it.  Will be repeating in my head.  Time for SlipKnot I think @)(++(*
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Montclair

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #509 on: October 29, 2013, 07:41:15 PM »
You'll have to ask whoever started the thread. I'm satisfied that the McCanns did suppress the Oakley report.

I am too and also that the PJ nor SY were never given the e-fits.