« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 96   Go Down

Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267435 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #705 on: October 31, 2013, 03:33:38 PM »
Montclair - is CdM a reliable newspaper?
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #706 on: October 31, 2013, 03:34:23 PM »
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #707 on: October 31, 2013, 03:46:02 PM »
Quote from: Montclair on October 31, 2013, 03:32:38 PM
Yes, it is.

thanks for replying.

So the latest tractor man sighting is not full of holes like Swiss cheese?
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #708 on: October 31, 2013, 03:48:34 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 31, 2013, 03:33:38 PM
Montclair - is CdM a reliable newspaper?

It was the Times that broke the story about the efits being buried for five years,   not CdM...followed by the tabloids and various tv stations...which a bit of embellishment and other tiny twists.....see my post above regarding c4 !


All this obfuscating is getting so tedious.....
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #709 on: October 31, 2013, 03:49:04 PM »
Interesting news elsewhere, it seems SY and the PJ have asked to Mccanns not to comment in public.
Logged

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #710 on: October 31, 2013, 03:56:05 PM »
The McCanns have not denied that they kept this information  from the  police   ( including Scotland Yard ) 

It is a very serious accusation,  that implies they sabotaged the investigation into their daughter's disappearance

This is not the  time for a  'no comment'   
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #711 on: October 31, 2013, 03:58:04 PM »
Quote from: icabodcrane on October 31, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
The McCanns have not denied that they kept this information  from the  police   ( including Scotland Yard ) 

It is a very serious accusation,  that implies they sabotaged the investigation into their daughter's disappearance

This is not the  time for a  'no comment'

In the light of two active investigations and a request not to comment, the public appetite to hear their side of it, pick it to pieces and call it "lies" hasn't been catered to.
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #712 on: October 31, 2013, 04:00:31 PM »
Quote from: Jazzy on October 31, 2013, 03:58:04 PM
In the light of two active investigations and a request not to comment, the public appetite to hear their side of it, pick it to pieces and call it "lies" hasn't been catered to.

Didn't the PJ ask the McCanns not to talk to the media 6 years ago?
Didn't stop them then did it?
Logged
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #713 on: October 31, 2013, 04:02:41 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 31, 2013, 04:00:31 PM
Didn't the PJ ask the McCanns not to talk to the media 6 years ago?
Didn't stop them then did it?

That is an area for discussion. I think you are wrong.

Perhaps this time the Mccanns have some faith in the PJ.
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #714 on: October 31, 2013, 04:05:55 PM »
LOL serious allegations from forum posters - some of which have posted today that they can't understand simple statements.
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #715 on: October 31, 2013, 04:07:08 PM »
Quote from: Jazzy on October 31, 2013, 04:02:41 PM
That is an area for discussion. I think you are wrong.

Perhaps this time the Mccanns have some faith in the PJ.

Converted are they?  I hadn't realised the PJ were a religious organisation.
Logged
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #716 on: October 31, 2013, 04:07:51 PM »
who mentioned converted?
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #717 on: October 31, 2013, 04:09:07 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 31, 2013, 04:07:08 PM
Converted are they?  I hadn't realised the PJ were a religious organisation.


Very clever. Anything else?
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #718 on: October 31, 2013, 04:11:08 PM »
53 pages (at least that is what it says on my computer)

Where is the proof that the efits were suppressed.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #719 on: October 31, 2013, 04:17:15 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 31, 2013, 04:11:08 PM
53 pages (at least that is what it says on my computer)

Where is the proof that the efits were suppressed.

Where is there any indication of any type whatsoever from any source or evidence over the years they were sent is the more pertinent question.....or indeed mentioned by the mccanns and or their PIs up until 2013 not a pip squeak at all anywhere...balance of probabilities is the time story is correct, you faff around it though till kingdom come......
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 96   Go Up
« previous next »