Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.

[Aiofe]

Of course if the McCanns & their friends had cooperated with the Portuguese Police the investigation would have remained open.

Not necessarily.

[Wonderfulspam]

The McCanns were willing to return. See the communications in the files.

And did they?

[Aiofe]

The McCanns have not denied that they kept this information  from the  police   ( including Scotland Yard ) 

It is a very serious accusation,  that implies they sabotaged the investigation into their daughter's disappearance

This is not the  time for a  'no comment'

They have neither denied nor confirmed that point.

[imustpointout]

Damn it chief - they don't want to come back.

Don't worry - close the file.

[John]

Can we keep to topic please.

[Aiofe]

Didn't the PJ ask the McCanns not to talk to the media 6 years ago?
Didn't stop them then did it?

Six years ago they were targets for framing and I do not blame them for using every tool at their disposal. Now apparently they are going to be associates with Portuguese Justice!

[Aiofe]

Where is there any indication of any type whatsoever from any source or evidence over the years they were sent is the more pertinent question.....or indeed mentioned by the mccanns and or their PIs up until 2013 not a pip squeak at all anywhere...balance of probabilities is the time story is correct, you faff around it though till kingdom come......

Balance of probabilities in your biased opinion.

I think the matter is still undecided.

[imustpointout]

Can we keep to topic please.

It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?

[Wonderfulspam]

Six years ago they were targets for framing and I do not blame them for using every tool at their disposal. Now apparently they are going to be associates with Portuguese Justice!

Six years ago they were targets for framing


Is there any proof of this?

[imustpointout]

It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?

54 pages - any proof yet?

[Aiofe]

It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?

Is that a matter of fact or merely Oakley's assumption. Is it known whether or not the efits were shared with the AG.

[Redblossom]

Balance of probabilities in your biased opinion.

I think the matter is still undecided.

Whats biased about seeing there is no evidence of any kind whatsoever they were given........not a mention, not a squeek in five years from the Mccanns OR anyone else in any way shape or form.....such important efits to sit on some back burner, purleeeese! Youre having a laugh
 

No official has been quoted as confirming or denying, thats all youve got though....ignore the sand storm


Is this person lying? Do listen

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2760.msg97488#new


EDITED!!! For the hard of hearing

[Aiofe]

Whats biased about seeing there is no evidence of any kind whatsoever they were given........not a mention, not a squeek in five years from the Mccanns OR anyone else in any way shape or form.....such important efits to sit on some back burner, purleeeese! Youre having a laugh
 

No official has been quoted as confirming or denying, thats all youve got though....ignore the sand storm

Where is YOUR evidence that it was not communicated to the Portuguese in an attempt to reopen the case.

There is no confirmation either way.

[imustpointout]

So we do not know whether they were offered to the AG as an attempt to reopen the case.

As we do not know, we do not know whether the McCanns witheld the information or Portugal rejected it.

As I sated in my original comment.

Maybe both sides should stop acting above their pay grade!

can you explain the point in red.

[Wonderfulspam]

Six years ago they were targets for framing and I do not blame them for using every tool at their disposal. Now apparently they are going to be associates with Portuguese Justice!

Six years ago they were targets for framing

Is there any proof of this?