« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 96   Go Down

Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267441 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #750 on: October 31, 2013, 05:40:09 PM »
the repetitive asking for proof is boring to the extreme now
Logged

Offline John

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #751 on: October 31, 2013, 05:40:23 PM »
The truth has a terrible habit of rising to the surface so be under no illusion, if the Oakley claim about the report and e-fits turns out to be true it will have a significant impact on the McCanns credibility.  Watch out for a resignation or two first though as that is always a good indicator of things to come.
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #752 on: October 31, 2013, 05:41:27 PM »
Quote from: John on October 31, 2013, 05:40:23 PM
The truth has a terrible habit of rising to the surface so be under no illusion, if the Oakley claim about the report and e-fits turns out to be true it will have a significant impact on the McCanns credibility.  Watch out for a resignation or two first though as that is always a good indicator of things to come.

If
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #753 on: October 31, 2013, 05:42:11 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 31, 2013, 05:40:09 PM
the repetitive asking for proof is boring to the extreme now

Yes & I find you most entertaining.
Logged
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #754 on: October 31, 2013, 05:42:55 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 31, 2013, 05:38:52 PM
Six years ago they were targets for framing

Is there any proof of this?
do you mean any evidence of this?
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #755 on: October 31, 2013, 05:45:16 PM »
Quote from: davel on October 31, 2013, 05:42:55 PM
do you mean any evidence of this?

No
Logged
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #756 on: October 31, 2013, 05:50:18 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 31, 2013, 05:45:16 PM
No

 The PJ are very experienced at covering their tracks. in the Cipriano torture case it was proved in court that the torture took place but it was impossible to prove who did it. So no..you wont find proof but of course that does not mean it didn't happen
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #757 on: October 31, 2013, 05:54:01 PM »
Quote from: icabodcrane on October 31, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
The McCanns have not denied that they kept this information  from the  police   ( including Scotland Yard ) 

It is a very serious accusation,  that implies they sabotaged the investigation into their daughter's disappearance

This is not the  time for a  'no comment'
They could have immediately said "no comment", which precisely avoids the meaningful failure to answer, why didn't they ? The alternative only required a bit of imagination.
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #758 on: October 31, 2013, 05:55:15 PM »
Quote from: AnneGuedes on October 31, 2013, 05:54:01 PM
They could have immediately said "no comment", which precisely avoids the meaningful failure to answer, why didn't they ? The alternative only required a bit of imagination.

Meaningful failure to answer? Only to you.
Logged

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #759 on: October 31, 2013, 05:59:44 PM »
Let's face it it's true they would have denied it otherwise.
Logged

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #760 on: October 31, 2013, 06:01:16 PM »
Quote from: Apostate on October 31, 2013, 05:59:44 PM
Let's face it it's true they would have denied it otherwise.

Of course they would

Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #761 on: October 31, 2013, 06:02:21 PM »
If they had been asked to say nothing that's exactly what they would do, say nothing. Just like...................them saying nothing.
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #762 on: October 31, 2013, 06:03:03 PM »
Quote from: Apostate on October 31, 2013, 05:59:44 PM
Let's face it it's true they would have denied it otherwise.

why did you bring what is allegedly a false photo to this forum?
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #763 on: October 31, 2013, 06:14:34 PM »
Has "they didn't deny it" ever been used to prove a case in a court of law anywhere in the world?
Logged

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #764 on: October 31, 2013, 06:24:16 PM »
it's true - deep down we all know it is
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 96   Go Up
« previous next »