Who Confessed to the Murder?

[Nicholas]

Mitchell is as guilty as sin and the evidence proves it.

It does - I agree

Sandra slipped up when she posted this

‘From police interview heard at trial, luke said
Quote
She liked that top, she like, she bought some of her own stuff, I mean, the clothes, the cords, jeans, she was wearing on Monday night. I think they were borrowed off her sister.

reproduced by WakeyWakey here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg458404.html#msg458404

[Nicholas]

I don't think we should be promoting any of Sandra Leans fantasies Nicholas!

No we shouldn’t - helpful though for study purposes 

[Nicholas]

Re the alleged confession - could it have come from one of these 2 PI’s?

[Nicholas]

Corrine Mitchell refers to her son as normal but so did Cindy Watts about her son https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YHMFQzyAAu8

‘Analysing Chris Watts and Cindy Watts on the phone’

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YD5P7xVS0rU

I don’t think Corrine Mitchell mentioned the bottles of urine found in Luke’s bedroom during the James English podcast - though found her comments on JF & the ‘condom’ interesting

Corrine Mitchell on JF:
‘He must have been the kind of person who got off on seeing a dead body - he must have seen her where he was - he must of. But why use a condom for masturbating

Wonder what Luke made of the hedgehog story told by Corrine?

[Nicholas]

Also according to Corrine Mitchell - to James English

‘I mean a lot of her injuries were done after death. So it’s been somebody who really didn’t give a shit about being caught’

[DanniCash]

Just listened to the podcast - James English didn't seem to push Corinne at all as to *who* confessed?

[Venturi Swirl]

So boring listening to Sandra Lean waffling on about the same old crap. You would think she had learned her lesson from the numerous cases she already publicly supported where the guilty later confessed. What an idiot!

Mitchell is as guilty as sin and the evidence proves it.

I don't think we should be promoting any of Sandra Leans fantasies Nicholas!

Mitchell may be guilty but the evidence against him is very thin imo.

[Nicholas]

I also find it interesting how Sandra Lean is suggesting the following here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452099.html#msg452099

“I was thinking about the claimed 20 pieces of solid evidence against Luke (that's been deleted now) - what's always interested me are the number of pieces of "evidence" that applied equally, and in some cases, moreso, to others than they did to Luke - so, drug use, connection with knives, "dark" interests, etc, etc. There are at least 5 others to whom all of these apply. Of those five, we can add serious mental health conditions (which didn't apply to Luke), previous attacks on women[/b] (which didn't apply to Luke), attacks with bladed intruments (which didn't apply to Luke), long histories of violence and/or involvement with the police (which didn't apply to Luke)[/color]
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452099.html#msg452099

“Dark interests” would suggest to me she has finally conceded Luke Mitchell’s interests in satanism aren’t/weren’t normal per se.

Left largely to his own devices he became defiant, violent and brooding with an unhealthy fascination with knives, the occult and drugs. He was first brought to the attention of the mental health profession aged just 11, following a fight at King’s Park Primary in Dalkeith. Although the incident was just a minor skirmish with another pupil, Mitchell’s attitude was sufficiently troublesome to warrant a referral to a school psychiatrist. However, there appears to have been little further action taken by the education authorities or his parents to curb his behaviour.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/natural-born-killer-1-1401861

Jodi Jones killer Luke Mitchell demands right to study Satanic textbooks in prison due to his 'religious beliefs'

JODI Jones’s killer Luke Mitchell has demanded the right to be given Satanic textbooks in jail because of his “religious beliefs”.

Mitchell wants six books including The Devil’s Notebook and Satan Speaks, claiming it’s his human right to have access to the occult materials.

Mitchell, 25, also wants a copy of The Satanic Bible, which calls for followers to create a lawless world where there is no right or wrong and where human sacrifice and murder is not only tolerated but encouraged.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/jodi-jones-killer-luke-mitchell-3407242

Something else I forgot to mention was that Sandra Lean had a falling out with Mrs Mitchell some time ago and Lean ceased to have any involvement with the case.

Was a factor for the alleged ‘falling out’ anything to do with Luke Mitchell ‘demanding’ ‘the right to be given Satanic textbooks in jail because of his “religious beliefs” I wonder?

[Nicholas]

Mitchell may be guilty but the evidence against him is very thin imo.

The evidence was thin in the Simon Hall case - as it can be in cases like this

[Nicholas]

Just listened to the podcast - James English didn't seem to push Corinne at all as to *who* confessed?

Don’t you find that odd? Someone’s allegedly confessed but James English didn’t want ALL the details?

[Nicholas]

It does - I agree

Sandra slipped up when she posted this

‘From police interview heard at trial, luke said
Quote
She liked that top, she like, she bought some of her own stuff, I mean, the clothes, the cords, jeans, she was wearing on Monday night. I think they were borrowed off her sister.

reproduced by WakeyWakey here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg458404.html#msg458404

How did Luke Mitchell know Jodi had borrowed her sisters clothes on the night of the murder and when did he see her in ‘the cords, jeans, she was wearing on Monday night’ ?

If the ‘cords,jeans’ were used to tie her arms up behind her back - how did he see them when he found her?

[Venturi Swirl]

How did Luke Mitchell know Jodi had borrowed her sisters clothes on the night of the murder and when did he see her in ‘the cords, jeans, she was wearing on Monday night’ ?

If the ‘cords,jeans’ were used to tie her arms up behind her back - how did he see them when he found her?

Which police interview did this come from?

[Venturi Swirl]

Don’t you find that odd? Someone’s allegedly confessed but James English didn’t want ALL the details?

Edited out for legal reasons?

[Nicholas]

Also according to Corrine Mitchell - to James English

‘I mean a lot of her injuries were done after death. So it’s been somebody who really didn’t give a shit about being caught’

Like someone ‘who really didn't give a sh*t about’ being filmed by the media on the day of Jodi Jones funeral?

[Nicholas]

Edited out for legal reasons?

Unlikely - ‘Anything Goes’ isn’t that the whole idea of James English’s podcasts?