Wouldn't the people have come forward by now if Andrina saw them? This is a small town wouldn't they have realised?
It's logical and reasonable to assume that if these 2 people were NOT connected to the murder they would have been traced. Andrina Bryson saw 2 people at the path whilst driving past, but as there was no reason to pay much attention she would only have had a fleeting glimpse, which will be why she could not identify LM in Court. I would suggest that the 2 people she saw were Jodi Jones and the person who killed her who has never been traced. It wasn't Luke M because it would be completely
IMPOSSIBLE for none of his DNA to be found at the murder scene or in his house despite 3 forensic searches. Therefore, the explanation for the 2 people at the path apparently not being traced is because one of them is deceased and the other disappeared when the Police focussed only on LM and failed to consider who else the male could have been. LM has been clearly "fitted up" to avoid the Police having an ongoing "maniac on the loose scenario".
One of the key pieces of evidence against LM was the statements of the search party who said in Court that LM went straight to the V in the wall, implying he knew where the body was already. However those statements had been
changed from the one's they gave at the time of the murder which all said that LM's dog alerted them near the V in the wall. The Jury were never told that the statements had been changed because the law in Scotland allows for the original statements not to be mentioned if they have been altered at a later date. Not only were the statements all changed, they were all changed to say the same thing......that LM went straight to the V in the wall. The chances of 3 people's recall being changed to end up saying the exact same thing are virtually nil.