Author Topic: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.  (Read 17914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Myster

It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #46 on: May 01, 2020, 12:12:09 PM »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #47 on: May 01, 2020, 12:13:51 PM »
“A statement issued on behalf of Park’s family said: “The family, friends and supporters of Gordon Park, and Carol Park’s children, are disappointed with today’s decision.

“Having exhausted all options, we are now left without the closure we were all hoping for. The judgment marks the end of our fight to clear his name.”
  https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/appeal-court-upholds-gordon-park-lady-in-the-lake-conviction

Who made this statement?

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #48 on: May 01, 2020, 12:43:54 PM »
Excerpts from an article by Jon Robins for the justice gap headed: “Government assurances sought over claims of political interference at miscarriage of justice watchdog” 4th September 2019
https://www.thejusticegap.com/oliver-campbell/

Henry Blaxland QC
”The QC went on to call the relationship between the Court of Appeal and the commission ‘quite poisonous in the last five years or so’.

Could it be because the Court of Appeal have cottoned on to innocence fraud?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #49 on: May 01, 2020, 08:41:01 PM »
Empowering the Innocent (ETI)
@EmpowerInnocent
Gordon Park appeal fails. What is the point of the ⁦@ccrcupdate⁩ (the so called “miscarriage of justice watchdog”) when the Court of Appeal can simply dismiss cases that it believes to be miscarriages of justice? What kind of watchdog is it?
12:36 PM · May 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

Michelle Diskin Bates
@Michelle_Diskin
Replying to
@EmpowerInnocent
 and
@ccrcupdate
This really makes no sense. There is nothing to prove he did anything. It seems to be just not wanting to quash anything.


https://mobile.twitter.com/EmpowerInnocent/status/1256185711801368576
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #50 on: May 01, 2020, 08:46:03 PM »
APPEAL
@C4CrimAppeals
A shame. Great work done by the CCRC to uncover fresh evidence in this case.
Quote Tweet
CCRC
@ccrcupdate
6h
Court of Appeal upholds the murder conviction in the @ccrcupdate referred case of Gordon Park.
https://twitter.com/DannyShawBBC/status/1256150506218631170?s=19
2:57 PM · May 1, 2020·Twitter Web App


https://mobile.twitter.com/C4CrimAppeals/status/1256221169822453761

Clearly not
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #51 on: May 02, 2020, 11:04:09 AM »
APPEAL
@C4CrimAppeals
A shame. Great work done by the CCRC to uncover fresh evidence in this case.
Quote Tweet
CCRC
@ccrcupdate
6h
Court of Appeal upholds the murder conviction in the @ccrcupdate referred case of Gordon Park.
https://twitter.com/DannyShawBBC/status/1256150506218631170?s=19
2:57 PM · May 1, 2020·Twitter Web App


https://mobile.twitter.com/C4CrimAppeals/status/1256221169822453761

Clearly not

How much has it cost the CCRC in relation to the Gordon Park case to date I wonder?

“The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred Gordon Park’s murder conviction to the Court of Appeal.

Gordon Park was convicted in January 2005 at Manchester Crown Court for the murder of his wife, Carol Park, 29 years after she went missing in the summer of 1976.  He was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Carol Park’s body was found by amateur divers in Coniston Water, Cumbria, in 1997 and the case became known as the Lady in the Lake murder. (See below for a detailed chronology of the case).

Mr Park appealed against his conviction but the appeal was dismissed in November 2008. Little over a year later, on 25 January 2010, he committed suicide in his cell at HMP Garth in Lancashire. In November 2010 members of Mr Park’s family applied on his behalf to the CCRC.

Following an exhaustive investigation, the CCRC has decided to refer Mr Park’s murder conviction for a fresh hearing at the Court of Appeal.

The Commission is referring the case because it considers there is a real possibility that the Court will quash the conviction in light of new evidence. In the Commission’s view that real possibility arises from the cumulative effect of a number of matters including:

* the non-disclosure of expert opinion undermining the consistent implication by the prosecution that Gordon Park’s climbing axe, Exhibit 1 at trial, could be the murder weapon.
 
* the non-disclosure of information undermining the reliability of a prosecution witness who gave evidence of a prison confession.
 
* new scientific evidence showing that Gordon Park was not a contributor to DNA preserved within knots of the rope used to bind Carol Park’s body.

* renewed relevance of expert evidence, presented for the appellant at the first appeal, that a rock found in the lake near Mrs Park’s remains could not specifically be linked to rocks at Bluestones (the Parks’ home).
 
The Commission’s painstaking and detailed review has considered numerous issues and lines of enquiry and involved several visits to Cumbria, interviews with multiple witnesses old and new, the use of cutting edge DNA testing and the investigation of multiple potential alternative suspects.

During the review we have used our section 17[1] powers dozens of times to obtain material from the Forensic Archive, seven individual police forces, the courts, the Crown Prosecution Service, prison authorities, the Probation Service, and a number of other government agencies and public bodies.

 Chronology of the case

Carol Park went missing in the summer of 1976 having been last seen in mid-July.

In August 1997 human remains were found by amateur scuba divers in Coniston Water, Cumbria. The remains were found at a depth of 24 metres, about 200 metres from eastern shore of the lake; they were tightly wrapped in bags and bound with knotted ropes. The body was later confirmed as that of Carol Park.

Gordon Park was arrested following the discovery of the body and was charged with Carol Park’s murder. The prosecution was discontinued in January 1998 on the basis that there was no realistic prospect of a conviction on the evidence then available.

New evidence came to light following the broadcast in September 2000 of a TV documentary called ‘A Very British Murder[2].

Mr Park was arrested on 13 January 2004 and again charged with murdering Carol Park “on or about” Saturday 17 July 1976.

Media coverage of his arrest generated new information which was used in the case against Mr Park.

His trial at Manchester Crown Court began on 25 November 2004 and the jury heard evidence over 27 days. At 3.45pm on Friday 28 January 2005, after deliberating for nine hours and twenty-seven minutes, the jury, by a unanimous verdict, found Gordon Park ‘guilty’ of Carol Park’s murder.

He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a recommended minimum prison term of 15 years.

Gordon Park’s appeal against conviction was dismissed at the Court of Appeal in November 2008.

On 25 January 2010, on his sixty-sixth birthday, Gordon Park took his own life in his cell at HMP Garth in Lancashire.

Members of Mr Park’s family, aided by his legal representatives, applied to the Commission for a posthumous review of his conviction on November 2010.

Mr Park’s family were represented in their application to the CCRC by Mr Maslen Merchant of Hadgkiss, Hughes & Beale Solicitors.
https://ccrc.gov.uk/commission-refers-the-murder-conviction-of-gordon-park/
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 11:13:12 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #52 on: May 02, 2020, 11:14:36 AM »
Members of Mr Park’s family, aided by his legal representatives, applied to the Commission for a posthumous review of his conviction on November 2010.

Mr Park’s family were represented in their application to the CCRC by Mr Maslen Merchant of Hadgkiss, Hughes & Beale Solicitors.

Interesting how the CCRC have stated ‘members of Mr Parks family’ &  ‘Mr Park’s family’ as opposed to his son Jeremy?


The posthumous appeal brought by Jeremy Park
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/appeal-court-upholds-gordon-park-lady-in-the-lake-conviction

The son of a retired teacher jailed for the notorious 'Lady in the Lake' murder has today lost his appeal to clear his father's name
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8277285/Son-Lady-Lake-killer-loses-appeal-against-fathers-conviction-murdering-wife.html

The case, brought by his son, Jeremy Park
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-england-cumbria-52499437


The Telegraph reported in 2004 here https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1477626/Son-of-Lady-in-the-Lake-tells-court-of-the-last-day-he-saw-her.html

how Jeremy Park gave evidence at his fathers trial.


“Giving evidence 28 years after her disappearance in the summer of 1976, Jeremy Park, now 34, said he could still recall the sense of rejection at their last meeting.

‘I remember trying to persuade her to come to Blackpool, me and Vanessa I think. I can remember she wasn’t very keen but didn’t really give a reason. I felt rejected at that point. I asked her in the way a six-year-old would. In my mind it’s just a snap memory. I remember it was sunny and warm. I wanted her to come and she said she wasn’t coming.’

He added,
’Everybody was there. My mum was in the bed, on the side nearest the door. She was lying down. She just looked a bit down. She’d gone into herself a little. She was pensive. She decided she wasn’t going.

The article goes on to report,

“Mr Park said he remembered that his mother had previously left home to live with a man he knew as Dave. He had been driven “a long distance” to see her at his home. It seemed she had been been away “for about a year” because he remembered “the passing of seasons

His mother had been “a fun loving person” who liked the company of adults. “She wasn’t particularly affectionate towards her children, but she played the role of mother.”

Following his mothers disappearance, his father brought the children up on his own. “He was a big softie, really, full of fun and affectionate.” Mr Park told Andrew Edis QC defending, at Manchester Crown Court. “He was like a mum and dad rolled into one.”
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 11:58:06 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #53 on: May 02, 2020, 12:07:52 PM »
Interesting how the CCRC have stated ‘members of Mr Parks family’ &  ‘Mr Park’s family’ as opposed to his son Jeremy?

I find the above disingenuous on the part of the CCRC especially given the facts of the Park family dynamics

https://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/567113.lady-in-the-lake-tragedy-for-children/

In 2018 it was reported,

Son Jeremy and daughter Rachel — along with Park’s third wife Jennie — remain convinced that their dad is innocent of the 1976 murder.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7215393/dna-test-lady-lake-carol-park/

2005
The couple's three children all gave evidence during the 10-week trial.
By an awful coincidence, Carol's sister, Christine, had been murdered by her jealous boyfriend 35 years ago. The Parks adopted her daughter Vanessa, when she was 18 months old. She gave evidence for the prosecution and has been ostracised by her family.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/jan/29/ukcrime.helencarter
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 12:12:12 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #54 on: May 02, 2020, 12:30:26 PM »
I find the above disingenuous on the part of the CCRC especially given the facts of the Park family dynamics

https://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/567113.lady-in-the-lake-tragedy-for-children/

In 2018 it was reported,

Son Jeremy and daughter Rachel — along with Park’s third wife Jennie — remain convinced that their dad is innocent of the 1976 murder.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7215393/dna-test-lady-lake-carol-park/

2005
The couple's three children all gave evidence during the 10-week trial.
By an awful coincidence, Carol's sister, Christine, had been murdered by her jealous boyfriend 35 years ago. The Parks adopted her daughter Vanessa, when she was 18 months old. She gave evidence for the prosecution and has been ostracised by her family.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/jan/29/ukcrime.helencarter

‘Ostracised’ because she wasn’t taken in by Gordon Parks deception ?

Here https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/r-v-park-judgment-010520.pdf
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #55 on: May 02, 2020, 12:38:26 PM »
The posthumous appeal brought by Jeremy Park
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/appeal-court-upholds-gordon-park-lady-in-the-lake-conviction

The son of a retired teacher jailed for the notorious 'Lady in the Lake' murder has today lost his appeal to clear his father's name
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8277285/Son-Lady-Lake-killer-loses-appeal-against-fathers-conviction-murdering-wife.html

The case, brought by his son, Jeremy Park
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-england-cumbria-52499437

Why is there no mention of Gordon Parks ’daughter Rachel — along with Park’s third wife Jennie’ ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #56 on: May 02, 2020, 02:07:18 PM »
Here https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/r-v-park-judgment-010520.pdf

Elizabeth Yeld
@lizyeld
6h
Replying to
@hanksoff03
 and
@easyjail
Jon Robins' account of this makes his innocence sound so clear. It's hard to understand how there is such an iron door against recognising mistakes from the past. I wonder if this does preserve public confidence in the justice system or if in fact it does the opposite?


https://mobile.twitter.com/hanksoff03/status/1256320439296552960

No idea what’s shes referring to; maybe this https://www.thejusticegap.com/appeal-judges-review-lady-in-the-lake-murder/ ?

Maybe she means Bob Woffinden https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246355/Lady-Lake-killer-innocent-real-murderer-large-says-investigative-journalist.html ?
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 02:12:12 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #57 on: May 02, 2020, 02:15:48 PM »
“A statement issued on behalf of Park’s family said: “The family, friends and supporters of Gordon Park, and Carol Park’s children, are disappointed with today’s decision.

“Having exhausted all options, we are now left without the closure we were all hoping for. The judgment marks the end of our fight to clear his name.”
  https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/appeal-court-upholds-gordon-park-lady-in-the-lake-conviction

Who made this statement?

“Other relatives of Carol Park said the ruling was a "very welcome decision".

In a statement issued by Cumbria Police, Claire Gardner and Kay Washford, nieces of Mrs Park, said:

"In January 2005, justice was served following a three-month trial with the jury reaching a majority verdict of guilty and Gordon Park was sentenced to life imprisonment.

"Our Auntie Carol had suffered a tragic death and we were relieved that she could now rest in peace and our family could move forward and remember her with the love and dignity she deserved.

"In the years following Gordon Park's conviction we have still had to endure the pain of reliving this nightmare in the times when it has been sought to have his conviction overturned.

"However, today is closure for us and we are relieved that this is the last appeal that can be sought and we can now live our lives remembering our auntie as the beautiful auntie she was."
https://www.klfm967.co.uk/news/uk-news/3094473/lady-in-the-lake-appeal-court-upholds-murder-conviction-for-gordon-park/
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 02:19:21 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #58 on: May 02, 2020, 03:03:07 PM »
Elizabeth Yeld
@lizyeld
6h
Replying to
@hanksoff03
 and
@easyjail
Jon Robins' account of this makes his innocence sound so clear. It's hard to understand how there is such an iron door against recognising mistakes from the past. I wonder if this does preserve public confidence in the justice system or if in fact it does the opposite?


https://mobile.twitter.com/hanksoff03/status/1256320439296552960
Hanksoff03 Retweeted
Hanksoff03
@hanksoff03
17h
Can and would the CCRC go back and challenge this decision?...they clearly felt there was enough to overturn?


https://mobile.twitter.com/hanksoff03/status/1256320439296552960

Hanksoff03
@hanksoff03
An `iron door up against recognising mistakes...` is a very good way of describing this system...it`s utterly heartbreaking that people in such powerful places,who can help so much,don`t want2at least look into+discuss the  accounts of 4e.g JonRobins,SandraLean,BobWoffinden et al


https://mobile.twitter.com/hanksoff03/status/1256518518041968640
« Last Edit: May 02, 2020, 03:05:15 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Gordon Park and the murder of his wife Carol in 1976.
« Reply #59 on: May 02, 2020, 06:12:03 PM »
APPEAL
@C4CrimAppeals
A shame. Great work done by the CCRC to uncover fresh evidence in this case.
Quote Tweet
CCRC
@ccrcupdate
6h
Court of Appeal upholds the murder conviction in the @ccrcupdate referred case of Gordon Park.
https://twitter.com/DannyShawBBC/status/1256150506218631170?s=19
2:57 PM · May 1, 2020·Twitter Web App


https://mobile.twitter.com/C4CrimAppeals/status/1256221169822453761

Clearly not

Carolyn Hoyle claimed her research into the CCRC was ‘thorough’

Last year Professor Carolyn Hoyle stated, re the Criminal Cases Review Commission,
https://ox.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Embed.aspx?id=69d464e5-e28a-4400-b964-a9dd01201ea0

If it were thorough she would have picked up on innocence fraud but it wasn’t part of her remit apparently

What were the names of the case workers at the CCRC who worked on the Gordon Park case ?

Why did it take 10 years to review the case?

Why did they refer on the confessional evidence ?

What happened to the alleged DNA - that fell away?

The CCRC are clearly not fit for purpose
« Last Edit: May 03, 2020, 07:24:36 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation