Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?

[John]

Posters please note that any attempt to out members is viewed as a serious rule breach. Any further violations of this rule will result in posting privileges being moderated.  No further warning will be given.

[Sunny]

she did post abuse  imo have you read her twwete

Yes I have read her tweets elsewhere and although some were deeply unpleasant they were not as bad as others I have seen elsewhere on this subject and others.  I have seen many much more unpleasant and some indeed threatening messages and posts from other sceptics and also supporters too. I am not naming nicknames or giving details of the posts as I probably would be able to find them again and some of them made me feel ill.

[carlymichelle]

i  think the  thing is no matter how  someone  feels about this case  the dossier/s   butted in when they had no  need  too and brenda  finally  snapped   and ever since supporters have been defensive and hostile about her/their  actions  the mcanns should have condemmed the supporters actions but they  condoned it but  that doesnt  suprise me considering kate wanted amaral to feel fear and pain

[Mr Gray]

So don't ask that question again. "Do you condemn Brenda?" is no longer a valid question.

I dont need to ask any question..i have made my position clear

[Mr Gray]

i  think the  thing is no matter how  someone  feels about this case  the dossier/s   butted in when they had no  need  too and brenda  finally  snapped   and ever since supporters have been defensive and hostile about her/their  actions  the mcanns should have condemmed the supporters actions but they  condoned it but  that doesnt  suprise me considering kate wanted amaral to feel fear and pain

online abuse is a serious issue...it was absolutely right to highlight it..imo

[John]

not to me it doesnt...brenda was the abuser..the mccanns were the victims

Can people who don't subscribe to social media be a victim of online abuse?

The reality about twitter is that if you are not a subscriber, the only way you would know if someone was posting abusive messages about you is if you were to go looking for them or someone who is a member went looking for them and thereafter told you about it.

[Mr Gray]

Can people who don't subscribe to social media be a victim of online abuse?

absolutely...just because some one does not see abuse or libel directed at them it is still abuse or libel

[Robittybob1]

Can people who don't subscribe to social media be a victim of online abuse?

I think so.  It is the potential effect it has on a person's reputation.

[John]

absolutely...just because some one does not see abuse or libel directed at them it is still abuse or libel

If you don't know about abuse you cannot be described as a victim.

[carlymichelle]

If you don't know about abuse you cannot be described as a victim.

unless some supporters know them/are part of their circle of their family and friends and run  to them about every  little  thing

[Mr Gray]

If you don't know about abuse you cannot be described as a victim.

That is absolute rubbish John.....abuse is abuse

[misty]

Can people who don't subscribe to social media be a victim of online abuse?

The reality about twitter is that if you are not a subscriber, the only way you would know if someone was posting abusive messages about you is if you were to go looking for them or someone who is a member went looking for them and thereafter told you about it.

Did Lord McAlpine frequent social media?

[Venturi Swirl]

If you don't know about abuse you cannot be described as a victim.

That’s untrue IMO.  You don’t always have to be aware of a harmful action in order to be considered a victim.  For example you could be a victim of computer hacking without knowing about it.

[Mr Gray]

its quite obvious Leyland was the perpertartor and the mccanns were the victims....

[faithlilly]

Theoretically ANY mod could, why single out supporter mods?

Have sceptics ever compiled a dossier ?